Militärregime im Autokratievergleich und in der Demokratisierungsforschung – Befunde und Perspektiven der Forschung

  • Aurel Croissant
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Der Autokratievergleich hat in den letzten Jahrzehnten mehrere Konjunkturen durchlaufen. Nach dem zweiten Weltkrieg dominierte die Totalitarismusforschung. Die Analyse totalitärer Führer- und Parteiendiktaturen wurde in den 1960er und 1970er Jahren abgelöst vom Konzept des Autoritarismus (Brooker 2009). Mit der „dritten Demokratisierungswelle„ (1974 ff.) geriet die Autoritarismusforschung in den Schatten der Demokratisierungsstudien. Die Analyse nicht-demokratischer Regime blieb relevant, wurde aber vorrangig mit Blick auf die Chancen, Pfade und Herausforderungen der Demokratisierung und Konsolidierung post-autoritärer Regime betrieben (Ulfelder 2005).

Literatur

  1. Agüero, Felipe. 1998. Legacies of transitions: Institutionalization, the military, and democracy. Mershon International Studies Review 42(2):383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alagappa, Muthiah (Hrsg.). 2004. Military Professionalism in Asia: Conceptual and Empirical Perspectives. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arceneaux, Craig L. 2001. Bounded Missions: Military Regimes and Democratization in the Southern Cone and Brazil. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Art, David. 2012. What Do We Know About Authoritarianism After Ten Years? Comparative Politics 44(3):351–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bank, André. 2009. Die Renaissance des Autoritarismus. Erkenntnisse und Grenzen neuerer Beiträge der Comparative Politics und Nahostforschung. hrss 4(1):10–41.Google Scholar
  6. Barany, Zoltan D. 1997. „Democratic Consolidation and the Military: The East European Experience”. Comparative Politics 30(1):21–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barracca, Steven. 2007. Military coups in the post-cold war era: Pakistan, Ecuador and Venezuela. Third World Quarterly 28(1):137–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belkin, Aaron und Evan Schofer. 2003. Toward a Structural Understanding of Coup Risk. Journal of Conflict Resolution 47(5):594–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boix, Carles und Milan Svolik. 2011. The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions and Power-Sharing in Dictatorships. Manuskript.Google Scholar
  10. Brooker, Paul. 2009. Non-Democratic Regimes, 2. Auflage. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Brownlee, Jason. 2007. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheibub, José A., Jennifer Gandhi und John Vreeland. 2009. Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice 143(1–2):67–101.Google Scholar
  13. Cheibub, José Antonio. 2007. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Croissant, Aurel.2013 (im Erscheinen). Coups and Post-Coup Politics in Southeast Asia and the Pacific Islands: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives. Australian Journal of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  15. Croissant, Aurel und David Kuehn. 2011. Militär und zivile Politik. München: Oldenbourg Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Croissant , Aurel , David Kuehn, Paul W. Chambers, Philip Voelkel und Siegfried O. Wolf. 2011. Theorizing Civilian Control in New Democracies: Agency, Structure and Institutional Change. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 5(1):75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Croissant , Aurel , David Kuehn, Paul W. Chambers und Siegfried. 2010. Beyond the fallacy of coup-ism: conceptualizing civilian control of the military in emerging democracies. Democratization 17(5):950–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Croissant , Aurel , David Kuehn, Philip Lorenz und Paul W. Chambers 2013. Democratization and Civliian Control in Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Croissant, Aurel und Stefan Wurster. 2013. Persistence and Performance of Autocracies in Comparison: Introducing Issues and Perspectives. Contemporary Politics, special issue, vol. 19, no. 1: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ezrow, Natasha M. und Erica Frantz. 2011. Dictators and Dictatorships. Understanding Authoritarian Regimes and Their Leaders. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  21. Feaver, Peter D. 1996. The Civil-Military Problematique: Huntington, Janowitz, and the Question of Civilian Control. Armed Forces & Society 23(2):127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Finer, Samuel E. 1962. The man on horseback: The role of the military in politics. London: Pall Mall Press.Google Scholar
  23. Finer, Samuel E. 1985. The retreat to the barracks: Notes on the practice and the theory of military withdrawal from the seats of power. Third World Quarterly 7(1):16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Geddes, Barbara. 1999. What do we know about democratization after twenty years? Annual Review of Political Science 2: 115–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Geddes, Barbara. 2006. Paradigms and sand castles: Theory building and research design in comparative politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  26. Geddes, Barbara. 2009. How Autocrats Defend Themselves Against Armed Rivals. Manuskript.Google Scholar
  27. Geddes, Barbara, Joseph Wright und Erica Frantz. 2012. Authoritarian Regimes: A New Data Set. Manuskript.Google Scholar
  28. Hadenius, Axel und Jan Teorell. 2007. Pathways from Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 18(1):143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hadenius, Axel und Jan Teorell. 2010. Authoritarian Regimes Data Set, version 2.1, Codebook. Department of Political Science, Lund University.Google Scholar
  30. Huntington, Samuel P. 1957. The soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil-military relations. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kailitz, Steffen. 2012. Why and How We Should Classify Political Regimes by their Legitimation? Manuskript.Google Scholar
  33. Kamrava, Mehran 2000: Military Professionalization and Civil-Military Relations in the Middle East. Political Science Quarterly 122(3):433–459.Google Scholar
  34. Karl, Terry L. und Philippe C. Schmitter. 1991. Modes of Transition in Latin America, Southern and Eastern Europe. International Social Science Journal 128: 269–284.Google Scholar
  35. Kräme, Raimund und Armin Kuhn. 2006. Militär und Politik in Süd- und Mittelamerika: Herausforderungen für demokratische Politik. Berlin: Dietz.Google Scholar
  36. Lai, Brian und Dan Slater. 2005. Institutions on the Offensive. Domestic Sources of Dispute Initiation in Authoritarian Regimes, 1950–1992. American Journal of Political Science 50: 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lasswell, Harold D. 1941. The Garrison State. The American Journal of Sociology 46(4):455–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Linz, Juan J. 2000. Totalitäre und autoritäre Regime, Berlin: Berliner Debatte Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
  39. Linz, Juan J. und Alfred C. Stepan. 1996. Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Luttwak, Edward. 1968. Coup d’état: A practical handbook. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  41. Magaloni, Beatriz und Ruth Kricheli. 2010. Political Order and One-Party Rule. Annual Review of Political Science 13: 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mainwaring, Scott und Frances Hagopian. 2005. Introduction: The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America. In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America. Advances and Setbacks, Hrsg. Scott Mainwaring und Frances Hagopian, 1–14. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Mares, David R. 1998. Civil-Military Relations, Democracy, and the Regional Neighborhood. In Civil-Military Relations: Building Democracy and Regional Security in Latin America, Southern Asia, and Central Europe, Hrsg. David R. Mares, 1–25. Boulder/Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  44. Merkel, Wolfgang, Hans-Jürgen Puhle und Aurel Croissant. 2003. Defekte Demokratien, Bd. 1: Theorie. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.Google Scholar
  45. Merkel, Wolfgang. 2010. Systemtransformation: Eine Einführung in die Theorie und Empirie der Transformationsforschung, 2. Auflage. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  46. Merkel , Wolfgang , Johannes Gerschewski, Alexander Schmotz, Christoph H. Stefes und Dag 2012. Warum überleben Diktaturen? Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.Google Scholar
  47. Nordlinger, Eric A. 1977. Soldiers in politics: Military coups and governments. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  48. Pérez-Liñán, Anàbal. 2007. Presidential Impeachment and the New Political Instability in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pickel, Gert und Susanne Pickel. 2006. Politische Kultur- und Demokratieforschung. Grundbegriffe, Theorien, Methoden. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  50. Pilster, Ulrich und Tobias Böhmelt. 2011. Coup-Proofing and Military Effectiveness in Interstate Wars, 1967–99. Conflict Management and Peace Science 28(4):331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pin, Richard Jong-A und Shu Yu. 2010. Do Coup Leaders Matter? Leadership Change and Economic Growth in Politically Unstable Countries. KOF Working Papers 252, Zürich.Google Scholar
  52. Pion-Berlin, David und Harold A. Trinkunas. 2010. Civilian Praetorianism and military shirking during constitutional crises in Latin America. Comparative Politics 42(4):395–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Powell, Jonathan M. und Clayton L. Thyne. 2011. Global instances of coups from 1950–2010: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research 48(2):249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Przeworski, Adam. 2003. Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. In The Democracy Source Book, Hrsg. Robert Dahl, Ian Shapiro und José Antonio Cheibub, 76–93. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  55. Puddington, Arch. 2012. Freedom in the World 2012. The Arab Uprising and their Global Repercussions. In Freedom House. Freedom in the World 2012, http://www.freedomhouse.org.
  56. Saam, Nicole J. 1999. Simulating the Micro-Macro Link: New Approaches to an Old Problem and an Application to Military Coups. Sociological Methodology 29(1):43–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schedler, Andreas. 2009. The New Institutionalism in the Study of Authoritarian Regimes. Totalitarismus und Demokratie 6(2):323–340.Google Scholar
  58. Schedler, Andreas (Hrsg.). 2006. Electoral authoritarianism. The dynamics of unfree competition. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  59. Schmidt, Manfred G. 2010. Demokratietheorien: Eine Einführung, 5. Auflage. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schmidt, Manfred G. 2012. Legitimation durch Performanz? Zur Output-Legitimität in Autokratien. Manuskript.Google Scholar
  61. Serra, Narcàs. 2010. The military transition: Democratic reform of the armed forces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Siaroff, Alan. 2009. Comparing political regimes: A thematic introduction to comparative politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  63. Smith, Peter H. 2005. Democracy in Latin America: Political change in comparative perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Stepan, Alfred C. 1971. The military in politics: Changing patterns in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Svolik, Milan. 2008. Authoritarian Reversals and Democratic Consolidation. American Political Science Review 102(2):153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Svolik, Milan W. 2010. Contracting on Violence: Authoritarian Repression and Military Intervention in Politics. Manuskript.Google Scholar
  67. Teorell, Jan. 2012. Does Authoritarian Regime Type Affect the Prospects for Democratization? Contingent Regime Change in the World, 1972–2005. Manuskript.Google Scholar
  68. Trinkunas, Harold A. 2005. Crafting civilian control of the military in Venezuela: A comparative perspective. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  69. Ulfelder, Jay. 2005. Contentious Collective Action and the Breakdown of Authoritarian Regime. International Political Science Review 26(3):311–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Weber, Max. 1922. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  71. Welch, Claude E. Jr. 1992. Military Disengagement from Politics: Paradigms, Processes, or Random Effects. Armed Forces & Society 18(3):323–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wintrobe, Ronald. 2000. The Political Economy of Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Zimmerman, Ekkart. 1983. Political violence, crises, and revolutions. Cambridge: Schenkman.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aurel Croissant
    • 1
  1. 1.HeidelbergDeutschland

Personalised recommendations