Skip to main content

Profound Coziness: Affective Citizenship and the Failure to Enact Community in a Dutch Urban Neighborhood

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Die Ambivalenz der Gefühle

Abstract

Research has shown that the last two decades has seen the rise of voluntarism and more particular a reframing and re-enactment of the ideal-type citizen as a moral subject of responsible communities. In this chapter I ask how citizens are enacted by policy practitioners through different policy practices. Drawing on two years of ethnographic fieldwork in a deprived urban neighborhood, I analyse the policy practices of neighborhood gatherings in an Amsterdam neighborhood that are part of a community participation programme called Neighborhood Circle. Through these gatherings policy practitioners try to stimulate and encourage residents to perform voluntary tasks in the neighborhood. I will argue that in these meetings policy practitioners arouse ‘profound coziness’: a sphere animated by fellow feeling and imagine residents to be activated by the capacity to feel and act upon these feelings, rather than the capacity to think and deliberate rationally. Through these practices different ‘citizens’ emerge. On the one hand the ‘respected citizen’ embodied by (post)migrant women who feel proud to finally be able to participate and recognized by policy practitioners. On the other hand the ‘resentful citizen’ embodied by autochthonous volunteers who feel unrecognized by practitioners and feel publicly displaced by (post)migrant women. I show that the ideal-type citizen that is enacted by policy practitioners singles out other expressions of citizenship, leaving some volunteers in the neighborhood to feel displaced unable to act and a sense of fellow feeling and community far away.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The name of the community participation-program is an invented name. Also, the names used in this chapter are not the real names of the respondents in order to protect their privacy.

  2. 2.

    This management-approach originated from a pilot-project called Partnership on Socio-Economic and Integrated Development of Deprived Neighborhoods (POSEIDON), which had been implemented and carried out in an adjacent neighborhood in the district. It was an experiment on working with a bottom-up renewal strategy in several deprived neighborhoods in European cities. It was evaluated as successful and introduced to the neighborhood of Slotermeer in 2007.

  3. 3.

    Source: Gemeente Amsterdam, Dienst Onderzoek + Statistiek. 2010. Staat van de wijk 3. Geuzenveld-Slotermeer.

  4. 4.

    In Dutch, “meer” means “lake,” which gave Slotermeer its name as there is a lake in the district. However, in this call, another meaning of “meer” is used, as it also means “more.”

  5. 5.

    Gemeente Amsterdam, Dienst Onderzoek + Statistiek. 2010. Staat van de Wijk 3, Geuzenveld-Slotermeer.

References

  • Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, Susan, Elodie Marandet, Fiona Smith, Emma Wainwright, and Marilyn Diosi. 2006. “The Liminality of Training Spaces: Places of Private/Public Transitions.” Geoforum 37(6):895–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull, Anna Cento and Brian Jones. 2006. “Governance and Social Capital in Urban Regeneration: A Comparison Between Bristol and Naples.” Urban Studies 43(4):767–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, John. 2010. “Enrolling Ordinary People: Governmental Strategies and the Avoidance of Politics?” Citizenship Studies 14(6):637–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, John and Janet Newman. 1997. The Managerial State: Power, Politics and Ideology in the Remaking of Social Welfare. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, John; Janet Newman, and Louise Westmarland. 2007. “Creating Citizens-Consumers? Public Service Reform and (Un)Willing Selves.” pp. 125–145 in On Willing Selves: Neoliberal Politics and the Challenge of Neuroscience, edited by Sabine Maasen and Barbara Stutter. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wilde, Mandy. 2013. “Een gevoelige kwestie of een gevoelskwestie? Affectief burgerschap in de wijk in historisch perspectief.” pp. 24–43 in Als meedoen pijn doet. Affectief burgerschap in de wijk, edited by Evelien Tonkens and Mandy de Wilde. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wilde, Mandy; Menno Hurenkamp, and Evelien Tonkens. 2014. “Flexible Relations, Frail Contacts and Failing Demands: How Community Groups and Local Institutions Interact in Local Governance in the Netherlands.” Urban Studies 51(16):3365–3383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duyvendak, Jan Willem. 2011. The Politics of Home: Belonging and Nostalgia in Western Europe and the United States. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, Norbert. [1976] 2005. Gevestigden en Buitenstaanders: Spanningen en Machtsverhoudingen Tussen Twee Arbeidersbuurten. Amsterdam: Boom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, Amitai. 1998. The New Golden Rule: Community and Morality In a Democratic Society. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, Ray and Ade Kearns. 2001. “Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood.” Urban studies, 38(12): 2125–2143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortier, Anne-Marie. 2010. “Proximity by Design? Affective Citizenship and the Management of Unease.” Citizenship Studies 14(1):17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2007. “Too Close for Comfort: Loving thy Neighbor and the Management of Multicultural Intimacies.” Environment and Planning D 25(1):104–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haus, Michael and Jan Erling-Klausen. 2011. “Urban Leadership and Community Involvement: Ingredients for Good Governance?” Urban Affairs Review 47(2):256–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, Arlie. 2003. The Commercialization of Intimate Life: Notes from Home and Work. Berkeley, London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isin, Engin. 2004. “The Neurotic Citizen.” Citizenship Studies 8(3):217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Carol. 2010. “The Politics of Affective Citizenship: From Blair to Obama.” Citizenship Studies 14(5):495–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larner, Wendy. 2005. “Neoliberalism in (Regional) Theory and Practice: The stronger Communities Action Fund in New Zealand.” Geographical Research 43(1):9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, Paul, Mike Foden, Ian Wilson and Christina Beatty. 2010. “Understanding Area-Based Regeneration: The New Deal for Communities Programme in England.” Urban Studies 47(2):257–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lister, Ruth. 2003. Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowndes, Vivien and David Wilson. 2001. “Social Capital and Local Governance: Exploring the Institutional Design Variable.” Political Studies 49(4):629–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeavy, Julie. 2009. “(Re)Analysing Community Empowerment: Rationalities and Technologies of Government in Bristols’ New Deal for Communities.” Urban Studies 46(4):849–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, William, Graham Smith, and Gerry Stoker. 2000. “Social Capital and Urban Governance: Adding a More Contextualized Top Down Perspective.” Political Studies, 48(4):802–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, George. 2002. The Sentimental Citizen: Emotion in Democratic Politics. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinetto, Michael. 2003. “Who Wants to Be an Active Citizen? The Politics and Practice of Community Involvement.” Sociology 37(1):103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Deborah. 2002. “Constructing the ‘Neighborhood Sphere’: Gender and Community Organizing.” Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 9(4):333–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mookherjee, Monica. 2005. “Affective Citizenship: Feminism, Postcolonialism and the Politics of Recognition.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8(1):31–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muehlebach, Anadrea. 2012. The Moral Neoliberal: Welfare and Citizenship in Italy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, Janet, ed. 2005. Remaking Governance: Peoples, Politics and the Public Sphere. Polity: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, Janer and Evelien Tonkens. 2011. Participation, Responsibility and Choice: Summoning the Active Citizen in Western European Welfare States. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, Janet and John Clarke. 2009. Publics, Politics and Power: Remaking the Public in Public Services. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pares, Marc, Jordi Bonet-Marti and Marc Marti-Costa. 2012. Does Participation Really Matter in Urban Regeneration Policies? Exploring Governance Networks in Catalonia (Spain). Urban Affairs Review 48(2): 238–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • POSEIDON Partnership on Socio-Economic and Integrated Development of Neighbourhoods (2006) Neighbourhood Management Guide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. 2004. Better Together. Restoring the American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Nicolas. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uitermark, Justus. 2014. “Integration and Control: The Governing of Urban Marginality in Western Europe.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38(4):1418–1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uitermark, Justus and Jan Willem Duyvendak. 2008. “Citizen Participation in a Mediated Age: Neighborhood Governance in the Netherlands.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32(1):114–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gunsteren, Herman. 1998. A Theory of Citizenship: Organizing Plurality in Contemporary Democracies. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kempen, Ronald and Gideon Bolt 2009. “Social cohesion, social mix, and urban policies in the Netherlands.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 24(4): 457–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mandy de Wilde .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Wilde, M. (2015). Profound Coziness: Affective Citizenship and the Failure to Enact Community in a Dutch Urban Neighborhood. In: Kleres, J., Albrecht, Y. (eds) Die Ambivalenz der Gefühle. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01654-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01654-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-01653-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-01654-8

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics