Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Umfragen, Wählererwartungen und strategisches Wählen: ein deutsch-britischer Vergleich

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Wahlen und Wähler

Zusammenfassung

"Duvergers Gesetz" ist vielleicht eine der bekanntesten, aber daher auch umstrittensten Regelmäßigkeiten, die für repräsentative Demokratien festgestellt, behauptet oder diskutiert wurden. Gemäß dieses "Gesetzes" tendieren Mehrheitswahlsysteme dazu, Zweiparteiensysteme hervorzubringen, während Mehrparteiensysteme nur dann entstehen und bestehen können, wenn das Wahlsystem nach den Prinzipien der proportionalen Repräsentation funktioniert (Duverger 1965, 1972).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Achen, Christopher H. (2002): "Toward a New Political Methodology. Microfoundations and ART", Annual Review of Political Science 5: 423–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, R. Michael, Frederik J. Boehmke und Jonathan Nagler (2006): "Strategic Voting in British Elections", Electoral Studies 25: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, R. Michael, und Jonathan Nagler (2000): "A New Approach for Modelling Strategic Voting in Multiparty Elections", British Journal of Political Science 30: 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bawn, Kathleen (1999): "Voter Responses to Electoral Complexity. Ticket Splitting, Rational Voters. and Representation in the Federal Republic of Germany", British Journal of Political Science 29: 487–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, Martin W. (2010): "General Election Prediction", Electoral Calculus (URL: http://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk, zuletzt besucht am 28. August 2010).

  • Der Bundeswahlleiter (2010): "Endgültiges Ergebnis der Erst- und Zweitstimmen nach Wahlkreisen bei den Bundestagswahlen 2009 und 2005" (URL: http://www.bundeswahlleiter.de/de/bundestagswahlen/BTW_BUND_09/veroeffentlichungen/engueltige/kerg.csv, zuletzt besucht am 31. Dezember 2010).

  • Cox, Gary W. (1997): Making Votes Count. Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Geoffrey, und Anthony Heath (1993): "A Tactical Error in the Analysis of Tactical Voting. A Response to Niemi, Whitten and Franklin", British Journal of Political Science 23: 131–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Stephen D. (2004): "Definition and Measurement of Tactical Voting. The Role of Rational Choice", British Journal of Political Science 34: 152–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, Mark, Richard Niemi und Guy Whitten (1994): "The Two Faces of Tactical Voting", British Journal of Political Science 24: 549–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, Allan (1973): "Manipulation of Voting Schemes. A General Result", Econometrica 41: 587–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gschwend, Thomas (2007): "Ticket-Splitting and Strategic Voting under Mixed Electoral Rules. Evidence from Germany", European Journal of Political Research 46: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Anthony, und Geoffrey Evans (1994): "Tactical Voting. Concepts, Measurement and Findings", British Journal of Political Science 24: 557–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Anthony, et al. (1991): Understanding Political Change. The British Voter 1964–1987,Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckfeldt, Robert, und John Sprague (1995): Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication. Information and Influence in an Election Campaign,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp, Jeffrey A., et al. (2002): "Strategic Voting, Party Activity, and Candidate Effects. Testing Explanations for Split Voting in New Zealand’s New Mixed System", Electoral Studies 21: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, Richard D., und Peter C. Ordeshook (1972): "A General Theory of the Calculus of Voting", in James F. Herndon und Joseph L. Bernd (Hg.), Mathematical Applications in Political Science. Vol. VI,Charlottesville: The University of Virginia Press, S. 32–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, Richard G., Guy Whitten und Mark N. Franklin (1992): "Constituency Characteristics, Individual Characteristics and Tactical Voting in the 1987 British General Election", British Journal of Political Science 22: 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riker, William H., und Peter C. Ordeshook (1968): "A Theory of the Calculus of Voting", American Political Science Review 62: 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappi, Franz Urban, und Paul W. Thurner (2002): "Electoral Behaviour in a Two-Vote System. Incentives for Ticket Splitting in German Bundestag Elections", European Journal of Political Research 41: 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satterthwaite, Mark A. (1975): "Strategy-proofness and Arrow’s Conditions. Existence and Correspondence Theorems for Voting Procedures and Social Welfare Functions", Journal of Economic Theory 10: 187–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger (1993): "Denn sie wissen nicht, was sie tun … Zum Verständnis des Verfahrens der Bundestagswahl bei westdeutschen und ostdeutschen Wählern", Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 3: 395–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, Helmut (1998): "Stimmensplitting bei Bundestagswahlen. Eine Form taktischer Wahlentscheidung", Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 29: 223–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle, Kenneth A., und Mark S. Bonchek (1997): Analyzing Politics. Rationality Behavior, and Institutions,New York/London: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shikano, Susumu, Michael Herrmann und Paul W. Thurner (2009): "Strategic Voting under Proportional Representation. Threshold Insurance in German Elections", West European Politics 32: 634–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Matthew M., und Laura B. Stephenson (2009): "The Political Context and Duverger’s Theory. Evidence at the District Level", Electoral Studies 28: 480–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, George (1986): "A General Model of Tactical and Inverse Tactical Voting", British Journal of Political Science 16: 395–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, Anthony (2010): "Independent Survey and Polling News", UK Polling Report (URL: http://ukpollingreport.co.uk, zuletzt besucht am 28. August 2010.

  • Zicht, Wilko, und Matthias Cantow (2010): "Umfragen zur Bundestagswahl" (URL: http://www.wahlrecht.de/umfragen/index.htm, zuletzt besucht am 4. November 2010).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Essex, Deutschland

    Dr. Martin Elff

  2. London, Großbrittanien

    Dr. Spyros Kosmidis

Authors
  1. Dr. Martin Elff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. Spyros Kosmidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Elff .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. für Sozialforschung, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB), Reichpietschufer 50, Berlin, 10785, Berlin, Germany

    Bernhard Weßels

  2. Feldkirchenstr. 21, Bamberg, 96052, Germany

    Harald Schoen

  3. Universität Stuttgart, Breitscheidstr. 2, Stuttgart, 70174, Germany

    Oscar W. Gabriel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elff, M., Kosmidis, S. (2013). Umfragen, Wählererwartungen und strategisches Wählen: ein deutsch-britischer Vergleich. In: Weßels, B., Schoen, H., Gabriel, O. (eds) Wahlen und Wähler. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01328-8_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01328-8_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-01327-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-01328-8

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation