Skip to main content

Maintaining Interaction Within a Closed Awareness Context

The Case of Students and Exams

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Kleine Geheimnisse
  • 1752 Accesses

Abstract

Wherever rules exist – in examinations, in love relationships, or in games of chance – people will be tempted to cheat and invent ways to escape detection. The goal is to “pass” and be viewed as normal and respectable despite engaging in activities others consider discrediting. Success depends upon keeping the “discredible” (i. e., not known or immediately perceptible) in its “closed awareness context” so it does not result in the “discredited” (i. e., evident on the spot). Failure results in being assigned a stigmatized identity based on “blemishes of character” and being reduced in the minds of others from “whole and usual” to “tainted and discounted” (Goffman 1963:2-3).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albas, Daniel and Cheryl Albas. 1993. Disclaimer mannerisms of students: How to avoid being labeled as cheaters. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 30(4):451–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albas, Cheryl and Daniel Albas. 1988. Emotion work and emotion rules: The case of exams. Qualitative Sociology 11(4):259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Howard. 1963. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York, Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Persepctive and Method. Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brent, Edward and Curtis Atkinson. 2011. Accounting for Cheating: An Evolving Theory and Emergent Themes. Research in Higher Education 52:640–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cizek, G.J. 1991. Cheating on Tests: How To Do It and Prevent It. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence and Erbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, Rose Laub. 1961. Insulation From Observability and Types of Social Conformity. American Sociological Review 26:28–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cote, James and Anton Allahar. 2007. Ivory Tower Blues. A University System in Crisis. University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote, Nelson. 1981. Identification as the Basis for a Theory of Motivation. Pp. 333–341 in G. Stone and H. Foxberman (ed.) Social Psychology Through Symbolic Interaction (2nd ed.) Toronto: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. 1962. “Common Sense Knowledge of Social Structures”. Pp. 689–712. In Theories of the Mind. Jordan M. Scher (ed) Glencoe: the Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, Barney and Anslem Strauss. 1981. Awareness Contexts and Social Interaction. Pp. 5–63 in G. Stone and H. Farberman (eds.) Social Psychology through Symbolic Interaction (2nd ed.) Toronto: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasner, B. and J. Corzine. 1978. Can labeling theory be saved? Symbolic Interaction 1(2):74-89.May 1, 2013 27

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Ervin. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1969. Strategic Interaction. University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Ervin. 1963. Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Structure of Gatherings. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1963a. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, N.I.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York, N.Y.: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, William and William Shaffir. 1977. The professionalization of medical students: developing a cloak of competence. Symbolic Interaction 1:71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemert, Edwin M. 1951. Social Pathology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, Lyn 1998. The Public Realm: Exploring the City’s Quintessential Social Territory. New York: Aldine de Grwytera.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, Sanford and Marvin Scott. 1967. Territoriality: A neglected sociological dimension. Social Problems 15:236–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D.L. 1997. Classroom cheating among natural science and engineering majors. Science and Engineering Ethics 3:433–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. and L.K. Trevino. 1993. Academic dishonesty: honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education. 64(5):520–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D.L., Trevino, L.K., and K.D. Butterfield. 2001. Dishonesty in academic environments. Journal of Higher Education 72(1):29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. Wright. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. London, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molnar, Kathleen and Marilyn Kletke. 2012. Does the type of cheating influence undergraduate students’ perceptions of cheating? Journal of Academic Ethnics 10:201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The Social System. Glencoe: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prus, Robert. 1994. Generic Social Processes: Intersubjectivity and Transcontextuality in the Social Sciences. Pp. 393–412 in Mary Lorenz Dietz, Robert Prus, and William Shaffir (eds.) Doing Everyday Life: Ethnography as Human Lived Experience. Toronto: Copp, Clark, Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prus, Robert and Scott Grills. 2003. The Deviant Mystique: Involvements, Realities, and Regulation. Westport, Connecticut: Praegar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prus, Robert and C.R.D. Sharper. 1977. Road Hustler: Grifting, Magic, and the Thief Subculture. New York: Kaufman and Greenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spier, Matthew. 1973. How to Observe Face-to-Face Communication: A Sociological Introduction. Palisades, CA: Goodyear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1947. Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Translated by Talcott Parsons and A.M. Henderson Glencoe: The Free Press pp. 98–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, E. and P. Deutschberger. 1963. Some dimensions of altercasting. Sociometry 26:454–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Albas, C., Albas, D. (2015). Maintaining Interaction Within a Closed Awareness Context. In: Bude, H., Dellwing, M., Grills, S. (eds) Kleine Geheimnisse. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00487-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00487-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-00486-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-00487-3

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics