Skip to main content

Führungskräftevergütung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Albach, H. (2003). Zurück zum ehrbaren Kaufmann – Zur Ökonomie der Habgier. WZB Mitteilungen, Bd. 100, S. 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backes-Gellner, U., Lazear, E., & Wolff, B. (2001). Personalökonomik: Fortgeschrittene Anwendungen für das Management. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. (1938). The Function of the Executive. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebchuk, L., & Fried, J. (2005). Pay without performance: overview of the issues. Journal of Corporation Law, 30(4), 647–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, U. (2006). Leistungsvergütung: Direkte und indirekte Effekte der Gestaltungsparameter auf die Motivation. Wiesbaden: Universitätsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2001). Are CEOs rewarded for luck? The ones without principals are. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(3), 901–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the selfdetermination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Agency theory: an assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, H. (2001). Stand und Entwicklung variabler Vergütungssysteme für Führungskräfte in Deutschland. In D. v Eckardstein (Hrsg.), Handbuch variable Vergütung für Führungskräfte (S. 27–45). München: Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. (1997). Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedl, G., Hocker, U., Döscher, T., & Hölz, C. (2009). Studie zur Vergütung der Vorstände in den DAX- und MDAX-Unternehmen im Geschäftsjahr 2008. München: herausgegeben von der DSW e.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mejia, L., & Balkin, D. (1992). Compensation, Organizational Strategy, and Firm Performance. Ohio: South Western Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mejia, L., Tosi, H., & Hinkin, T. (1987). Managerial control, performance and executive compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 30(1), 51–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B., & Liebman, J. (1998). Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 643–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, A., & Fredrickson, J. (2001). Top team coordination needs and the CEO pay gap: a competitive test of economic and behavioral views. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 96–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmström, B., & Milgrom, P. (1991). Multi-task principal-agent problems: incentive contracts, asset ownership and job design. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 7(2), 24–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmström, B., & Tirole, J. (1993). The theory of the firm. In R. Schmalensee, & R. Willig (Hrsg.), Handbook of Industrial Organization (S. 61–133). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M., & Murphy, K. (1990). Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), 225–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahnemann, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 262–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, E., & Rosen, S. (1981). Rank-order tournaments as optimal labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 841–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, Organization and Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. (1985). Corporate performance and managerial remuneration: an empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(1), 293–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, G., & Hambrick, D. (2007). Swinging for the fences, but strike out more often. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1055–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, G., & Tuschke, A. (2007). The adoption of institutionally contested organizational practices: the emergence of stock option pay in Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 33–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R., & Schwalbach, J. (2007). Zur Höhe und Dynamik der Vorstandsvergütung in Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 84(Special Issue 1), 111–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, B. III. (1991). The Quest for Value: A Guide for Senior Managers. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock-Homburg, R. (2010). Personalmanagement: Theorien – Konzepte – Instrumente (2. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroebe, A., & Stroebe, R. (2006). Motivation durch Zielvereinbarungen: Engagement in der Arbeit, Erfolg in der Umsetzung (2. Aufl.). Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Recht und Wirtschaft GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towers Perrin (o. J.). Worldwide Total Renumeration Report 2005–2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuschke, A. (2002). Aktienbasierte Entlohnung zur Bewerberauswahl am Arbeitsmarkt für Führungskräfte. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 54(1), 46–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuschke, A. (2003). The impact of executive compensation on the post-merger integration of U.S. and German firms. Schmalenbach Business Review, 55(1), 60–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahnemann, D. (1974). Judgement and uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, R., & Gomez-Mejia, L. (1998). A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 133–153.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anja Tuschke Prof. Dr. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tuschke, A. (2013). Führungskräftevergütung. In: Stock-Homburg, R. (eds) Handbuch Strategisches Personalmanagement. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00431-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00431-6_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-00430-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-00431-6

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics