Experimental Investigation of Flames

  • Jürgen Warnatz
  • Ulrich Maas
  • Robert W. Dibble


Computer simulations (which are treated in detail in some of the following chapters) are increasingly part of the discovery and design process. One can expect this growing trend to continue. Because of (not in spite of) the increasing level of sophistication of the numerical simulations, guidance from increasingly sophisticated experiment is a necessity. Such guidance is needed for several reasons:
  • A first reason for comparison with experiment is that the discovery of previously unknown chemical reactions or physics may emerge. It is through this iterative comparison between simulations and experiment that progress is made (investigation).

  • Secondly, in the interest of obtaining approximate solutions in an acceptable time, the simulations must be done on modelled equation sets where one has knowingly left out or simplified terms in the equations. With experience, one learns what terms may safely be neglected on the basis that they contribute little to the features of interest. This experience is obtained through comparison of numerical predictions with experiment (validation)


Particle Image Velocimetry Flame Front Light Sheet Nonpremixed Flame Vibrational Energy Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jürgen Warnatz
    • 1
  • Ulrich Maas
    • 2
  • Robert W. Dibble
    • 3
  1. 1.Universität Heidelberg Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Wissenschaftliches RechnenHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.Institut für Technische VerbrennungUniversität StuttgartStuttgartGermany
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations