Skip to main content

The Development of the Surgical Investigator

  • Chapter
  • 70 Accesses

Abstract

For centuries, the discipline of surgery has been fortunate in having a number of investigators whose contributions have been of basic scientific significance as well as practical clinical application. The great medical historian, Garrison, selected three surgeons whom he considered the greatest of all time—Ambroise Paré, John Hunter, and Joseph Lister (Fig. 1). It was Paré who re-introduced the ancient use of the ligature in the control of hemorrhage and placed it upon a firm, systematic, and practical basis. He also introduced the concept of the controlled experiment into surgery when he treated two wounded soldiers with similar wounds lying side by side in a tent near the field of battle. The first soldier’s wound was managed by the standard method of routine cauterization with boiling oil. The second was managed by debridement, cleansing, and the application of a clean dressing. He commented that he spent a restless night, feeling that the second patient would do very poorly. However, his wisdom was demonstrated the following morning when he found the second patient to be essentially without systemic symptoms whereas the former had high fever, tachycardia, and disorientation. When he was congratulated on the outcome of his first successful case, he very humbly replied: “Je le pansait, Dieu le guerit” (“I treated him, God cured him”), a quotation that is inscribed on his statue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gloyne SR. John Hunter. Edinburgh: E. & S. Liv 6. ingstone Ltd., 1950: 60.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Garrison, FH. History of medicine. Philadelphia: 7. W.B. Saunders Company, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Halsted WS. The training of the surgeon. In Sur 8. gical papers by Halsted WS. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1924; 11: 512–431.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sabiston DC Jr. Presidential address: Alfred Blalock. Ann Surg 1978; 188: 255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wangensteen OH. Teacher’s Oath. J Med Educ 1978; 53 (6): 524.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Carter BN. The fruition of Halsted’s concept of surgical training. Surgery 1952; 32: 518.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Blalock A. The nature of discovery. Ann Surg 1956; 144: 289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Forssmann W. Experiments on myself. Klin Wochenschr 1929; 8: 2085.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Osier Sir William. Acquanimitas with other addresses. Philadelphia: P. Blakiston’s Son and Co. Inc., 1932.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sabiston, D.C. (1986). The Development of the Surgical Investigator. In: Troidl, H., Spitzer, W.O., McPeek, B., Mulder, D.S., McKneally, M.F. (eds) Principles and Practice of Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-96942-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-96942-3_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-96944-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-96942-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics