Abstract
For centuries, the discipline of surgery has been fortunate in having a number of investigators whose contributions have been of basic scientific significance as well as practical clinical application. The great medical historian, Garrison, selected three surgeons whom he considered the greatest of all time—Ambroise Paré, John Hunter, and Joseph Lister (Fig. 1). It was Paré who re-introduced the ancient use of the ligature in the control of hemorrhage and placed it upon a firm, systematic, and practical basis. He also introduced the concept of the controlled experiment into surgery when he treated two wounded soldiers with similar wounds lying side by side in a tent near the field of battle. The first soldier’s wound was managed by the standard method of routine cauterization with boiling oil. The second was managed by debridement, cleansing, and the application of a clean dressing. He commented that he spent a restless night, feeling that the second patient would do very poorly. However, his wisdom was demonstrated the following morning when he found the second patient to be essentially without systemic symptoms whereas the former had high fever, tachycardia, and disorientation. When he was congratulated on the outcome of his first successful case, he very humbly replied: “Je le pansait, Dieu le guerit” (“I treated him, God cured him”), a quotation that is inscribed on his statue.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gloyne SR. John Hunter. Edinburgh: E. & S. Liv 6. ingstone Ltd., 1950: 60.
Garrison, FH. History of medicine. Philadelphia: 7. W.B. Saunders Company, 1929.
Halsted WS. The training of the surgeon. In Sur 8. gical papers by Halsted WS. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1924; 11: 512–431.
Sabiston DC Jr. Presidential address: Alfred Blalock. Ann Surg 1978; 188: 255.
Wangensteen OH. Teacher’s Oath. J Med Educ 1978; 53 (6): 524.
Carter BN. The fruition of Halsted’s concept of surgical training. Surgery 1952; 32: 518.
Blalock A. The nature of discovery. Ann Surg 1956; 144: 289.
Forssmann W. Experiments on myself. Klin Wochenschr 1929; 8: 2085.
Osier Sir William. Acquanimitas with other addresses. Philadelphia: P. Blakiston’s Son and Co. Inc., 1932.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sabiston, D.C. (1986). The Development of the Surgical Investigator. In: Troidl, H., Spitzer, W.O., McPeek, B., Mulder, D.S., McKneally, M.F. (eds) Principles and Practice of Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-96942-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-96942-3_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-96944-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-96942-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive