Implementation Methodology

  • José Encarnação
  • Ernest G. Schlechtendahl
Part of the Symbolic Computation book series (SYMBOLIC)


Program development may be considered as the sequence of the following activities:
  • definition of requirements;

  • specification;

  • logic design;

  • programming;

  • testing;

  • completion of documentation.


Computer Graphic Input Device Storage Tube IEEE Computer Graphic Implementation Methodology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    P. Schnupp, Chr. Floyd: Software-Programmentwicklung und Projektorganisation. 2. Aufl. Berlin (1979) de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    J. Encarnação: Logical Design Techniques and Tools. Siemens Forsch.-u. Entwickl. Berichte, Bd. 7 Nr. 6. Heidelberg (1978) Springer-Verlag, pp. 332–335.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    D.T. Ross, K.E. Schoman: Structured Analysis for Requirements Definition. IEEE Trans. SE 3 (1977), pp. 6–15.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    SofTech: Prospectus: An Introduction to SADT. SofTech, Inc., Waltham, Mass., Doc. No. 9022-78, Feb. 1976.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    E.G. Schlechtendahl: CAD Process and System Design. In: J. Encarnação (ed.): Computer-Aided Design: Modelling, Systems Engineering, CAD-Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 89. Heidelberg (1980) Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. Jackson: Software Development as an Engineering Problem. Angewandte Informatik (1982) 2, pp. 96–103.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    E.B. Daly: Management of Software Development. IEEE Trans. SE 3 (1977), pp. 229–242.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    A. Altmann, G. Weber: Programmiermethodik. Arbeitsberichte des IMMD, Erlangen, 10 (1977) Nr. 3.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    H. Hanusa, H. Kuhlmann, G. Pfaff: On Constructing Interactive Graphics Systems. Proc. EUROGRAPHICS’ 82, Manchester. Amsterdam (1982) North-Holland Publ. Co.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    J. Encarnação, H. Hanusa, W. Straßer: Tools and Techniques for the Description, Implementation, and Monitoring of Interactive Man-Machine-Dialogues. Proceedings of the 1982 International Zurich Seminar on Digital Communications. IEEE Catalog No. 82CH1735-0.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Informationsverarbeitung; Programmdokumentation; DIN 66230, Ausg. 1.81. In: DIN Taschenbuch 166, Informationsverarbeitung 4. Berlin (1981) Beuth.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    C. Machover: A Guide to Sources of Information about Computer Graphics. IEEE Computer Graphics 1 (1981) 1, pp. 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    C. Machover: A Guide to Sources of Information about Computer Graphics. IEEE Computer Graphics 1 (1981) 3, pp. 63–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    J. Encarnação, W. Straßer (eds.): Geräteunabhängige graphische Systeme. München (1981) Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    R. Lindner: Aspects of Interactive Computer Graphics, Applications and Systems. Proc. 3rd European Electro-Optics Conference, Geneva, 1976. Soc. Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, Bellingham, Wash. (1976), pp. 274–288.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    R. Lindner: Rasterdisplay-Prozessoren — ihre Bedeutung, Konzepte und Verfahren. Dissertation. Techn. Hochschule Darmstadt (1979).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    V.L. Wallace: The Semantics of Graphics Input Devices. Computer Graphics 10 (1976) 1, pp. 62–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    R. Ganz, H.-J. Dohrmann: Farbgraphische Ausgabesysteme. ZwF 76 (1981) 5, pp. 223–239.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    L.C. Hobbs: Computer Graphics Display Hardware. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 1 (1981) 1, pp. 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    F.M. Lillehagen: CAD/CAM Work Stations for Man-Model Communication. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 1(1981)3, pp. 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    ACM/SIGGRAPH: Status Report of the Graphics Standards Planning Committee of ACM/SIGGGRAPH. Computer Graphics 11 (1977) 3.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    ACM: Special Issue: Graphics Standards. ACM Computing Surveys 10 (1978) 4.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    ACM/SIGGRAPH: Status Report of the Graphics Standards Planning Committee of ACM/ SIGGRAPH. Computer Graphics 13 (1979) 3.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    R.A. Guedj, H.A. Tucker: Methodology in Computer Graphics. Amsterdam (1979) North-Holland Publ. Co.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    R. Eckert, G. Enderle, K. Kansy, F.J. Prester: GKS’ 79 — Proposal of a Standard for a Graphical Kernel System. Eurographics 79 — Conference Proceedings Bologna (1979), pp. 2–17.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    ISO TC97/SC5/WG2 N117; Draft International Standard ISO/DP 7942; Information Processing, Graphical Kernel System (GKS), 1982.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    W. Straßer: Hardware and System Aspects of Computer Graphics: A Tutorial. In: J. Encarnação, O. Torres, E. Warman (eds.): CAD/CAM as a Basis for the Development of Technology in Developing Nations. Amsterdam (1981) North-Holland Publ. Co., p. 285.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    J. Encarnação: The Input and the Manipulation of Complex, Structured Graphical Objects. Position paper for the SEILLAC II Workshop, May 1979, France. Report of the Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam, Jan. 1979.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    H.G. Borufka, G. Pfaff: Konzept eines Kommandointerpretierers. Report GRIS 79-8. Techn. Hochschule Darmstadt, Fachgebiet Graphisch-Interaktive Systeme (1979).Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    H.G. Borufka, H. Kuhlmann, P. ten Hagen: Dialogue Cells, a Method for Defining Interactions. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 2 (1982) 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    R. Konkart, E. Alff, C. Hornung: Graphisches Informationssystem auf der Grundlage einer relationalen Datenbank. In: R. Gnatz, K. Samelson (eds.): Informatik Fachberichte, Bd. 11. Heidelberg (1977) Springer-Verlag, pp. 261–276.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    V. Glatzer, J. Encarnação: DATAS — Datenstrukturen in assoziativer Speicherung. Angewandte Informatik (1972), pp. 417–424.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    G. Weck: SAD — Ein Modell einer strukturabhängigen assoziativen Datenstruktur. Dissertation. Saarbrücken (1974) Universität des Saarlandes.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    N. Roussopoulos: Tools for Designing Conceptual Schemata of Databases. Computer Aided Design 11 (1979) 3, pp. 119–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    A.P. Buchmann, A.G. Dale: Evaluation Criteria for Logical Database Design Methodologies. Computer Aided Design 11 (1979) 3, pp. 120–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    J.A. Bubenko: IAM — An Inferential Abstract Modelling Approach to Design of Conceptual Schema. ACM/SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data. Toronto, August 1977.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    B.K. Kahn: A Structured Logical Database Design Methodology. NYU Symposium on Database Design. New York City, May 1978.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    J.M. Smith, D. Smith: Principles of Database Conceptual Design. NYU Symposium of Database Design. New York City, May 1978.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    E.G. Schlechtendahl: Comparison of Integrated Systems for CAD., Int. Conf. Computer Aided Design, IEE Conf. Publ. 111, Southampton (1974), pp. 111–116.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    E.G. Schlechtendahl: Integrierte Programmsysterne. Report KfK-CAD 2. Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe (1975).Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    R.E. Fulton: Using CAD/CAM to Improve Productivity. Mechanical Engineering 103 (1981) 11, pp. 64–69.Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    H. Grabowski: Veränderte Arbeitsstrukturen durch CAD-Systeme. ZwF 74 (1979) 6, pp. 294–300.Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    H. Grabowski, H. Maier: Der Konstrukteur als Programmierer. NC-Report 1-81 (1981), pp. 125–130.Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    D.T. Ross: ICES System Design. Cambridge (1976) MIT Press.Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    K.P. Beier: Systemsoftware für ein integriertes schiffbautechnisches Programmsystem. Dissertation. Berlin (1976) Techn. Univ.Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    K.P. Beier, W. Jonas: DINAS — A Transportable Executive System for Interactive Computer Aided Design. Proc. Int. Conf. Interactive Techniques in Computer Aided Design Bologna (1978), pp. 393–403.Google Scholar
  47. [47]
    Alcock, Shearing and Partners: GENESYS Reference Manual. Loughborough (1971) The GENESYS Centre.Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    P.J. Pahl, L. Beilschmidt: Informationssystem Technik. Programmierhandbuch. Report KfK CAD-81. Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe (1978).Google Scholar
  49. [49]
    E.G. Schlechtendahl: Grundzüge des integrierten Programmsystems REGENT. Angewandte Informatik (1976) 11, pp. 490–496.Google Scholar
  50. [50]
    E.G. Schlechtendahl, K.H. Bechler, G. Enderle, K. Leinemann, W. Olbrich: REGENT-Handbuch. Report KfK 2666 (KfK-CAD 71). Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe (1981).Google Scholar
  51. [51]
    K. Leinemann: Dynamische Datenstrukturen des integrierten CAD-Systems REGENT. Angewandte Informatik (1977) 1, pp. 26–31.Google Scholar
  52. [52]
    R. Schuster: System und Sprache zur Behandlung graphischer Information im rechnergestützten Entwurf. Report KfK 2305. Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe (1976).Google Scholar
  53. [53]
    G. Enderle, K.H. Bechler, F. Katz, K. Leinemann, W. Olbrich, E.G. Schlechtendahl, K. Stölting: GIPSY-Handbuch., Report KfK 2878. Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe (1980).Google Scholar
  54. [54]
    G. Enderle, K.-H. Bechler, H. Grimme, W. Hieber, F. Katz: GIPSY-Handbuch Band II. Report KfK 3216. Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe (1981).Google Scholar
  55. [55]
    G. Enderle: Problemorientierte Sprachen im REGENT-System. Angewandte Informatik (1976) 12, pp. 543–549.Google Scholar
  56. [56]
    M.F. Nelson: ICES STRUDL II. In: Three-Dimensional Continuum Computer Programs for Structural Analysis. New York (1972) ASME, pp. 23–24.Google Scholar
  57. [57]
    W.K. Giloi, R. Güth: Das Prinzip der Datenstruktur-Architekturen und seine Realisierung im STARLET-Rechner. Informatik-Spektrum 5 (1982) 1, pp. 21–37.Google Scholar
  58. [58]
    K.R. Dittrich, R. Hüber, P.C. Lockemann: Methodenbanksysteme: Ein Werkzeug zum Maßschneidern von Anwendersystemen. Informatik-Spektrum (1979) 2, pp. 194–203.Google Scholar
  59. [59]
    E.G. Schlechtendahl, G. Enderle: Ansätze zu Methodenbanken im technisch-wissenschaftlichen Bereich. Angewandte Informatik 8 (1982), pp. 399–409.Google Scholar
  60. [60]
    H. Barth: Grundlegende Konzepte von Methoden-und Modellbanksystemen. Angewandte Informatik 8 (1980), pp. 301–309.Google Scholar
  61. [61]
    R. Eggensberger: Design eines interaktiven didaktisch orientierten Methodenbanksystems. Angewandte Informatik 9 (1981), pp. 394–399.Google Scholar
  62. [62]
    H. Noltemeier: Modelle — Methoden — Daten. In: H. Noltemeier (ed.): Computergestützte Planungssysteme. Würzburg (1976) Physica-Verlag, pp. 247–253.Google Scholar
  63. [63]
    B. Schips: Ein Beitrag zum Thema “Methodenbanken”. Angewandte Informatik 11 (1977), pp. 465–470.Google Scholar
  64. [64]
    E.G. Schlechtendahl: Der Systemkern REGENT als Basis zur Entwicklung technisch-wissenschaftlicher Programmsysteme. 9. Int. Kongress über die Anwendungen der Mathematik in den Ingenieurwissenschaften, Weimar, 28.6.–4.7.1981, Hochschule für Architektur und Bauwesen, Heft 1 (1981), pp. 89–92.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Encarnação
    • 1
  • Ernest G. Schlechtendahl
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut für Informationsverwaltung und Interaktive SystemeFB 20 — TH DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany
  2. 2.Kernforschungszentrum KarlsruheKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations