Roles of Auxins and Cytokinins in Apical Dominance

  • Thomas C. Moore

Abstract

The term apical dominance refers to the inhibition of growth of subtending lateral (axillary) buds by a growing shoot apex. Some degree of apical dominance is found in all seed plants, and the phenomenon obviously is of profound significance in determining growth form. In some herbaceous plants [e.g. pea (Pisum sativum) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)] apical dominance is quite strong, the lateral buds commonly are suppressed, and the shoot thus develops as a single main axis or monopodium. In other species [e.g. tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) and potato (Solanum tuberosum)] apical dominance is much weaker and the shoot is extensively branched. Sometimes apical dominance is only partial, in which case some of the lateral buds develop while others remain fully inhibited.

Keywords

Boiling Kinetin NaOCl Lanolin Clorox 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ali, A. and R. A. Fletcher. 1970. Xylem differentiation in inhibited cotyledonary buds of soybeans. Can. J. Botany 48: 1139–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown, C. L., R. G. McAlpine, and P. P. Kormanik. 1967. Apical dominance and form in woody plants: a reappraisal. Am. J. Botany 54: 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Galston, A. W. and P. J. Davies. 1970. Control Mechanisms in Plant Development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gunckel, J. E. and K. V. Thimann. 1949. Studies of development in long shoots and short shoots of Ginkgo biloba L. III. Auxin production in shoot growth. Am. J. Botany 36: 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gunckel, J. E., K. V. Thimann, and R. H. Wetmore. 1949. Studies of development in long shoots and short shoots of Ginkgo biloba L. IV. Growth habit, shoot expression and the mechanism of its control. Am. J. Botany 36: 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Phillips, I. D. J. 1969. Apical dominance. Pp. 165–202 in: M. B. Wilkins, Ed. The Physiology of Plant Growth and Development. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, New York.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Phillips, I. D. J. 1971. Introduction to the Biochemistry and Physiology of Plant Growth Hormones. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sachs, T. and K. V. Thimann. 1964. Release of lateral buds from apical dominance. Nature 201: 939–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sachs, T. and K. V. Thimann. 1967. The role of auxins and cytokinins in the release of buds from dominance. Am. J. Botany 54: 136–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Salisbury, F. B. and C. Ross. 1969. Plant Physiology. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, California.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sorokin, H. P. and K. V. Thimann. 1964. The histological basis for inhibition of axillary buds in Pisum sativum and the effects of auxins and kinetin on xylem development. Protoplasma 59: 326–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Steward, F. C. and A. D. Krikorian. 1971. Plants, Chemicals and Growth. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thimann, K. V., T. Sachs, and K. N. Mathur. 1971. The mechanism of apical dominance in Coleus. Physiol. Plantarum 24: 68–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Titman, P. W. and R. H. Wetmore. 1955. The growth of long and short shoots in Cercidiphyllum. Am. J. Botany 42: 364–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wickson, M. E. and K. V. Thimann. 1958. The antagonism of auxin and kinetin in apical dominance. Physiol. Plantarum 11: 62–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zimmermann, M. H. and C. L. Brown. 1971. Trees, Structure and Function. Springer-Verlag, New York. (Pp. 17–29).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas C. Moore
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Botany and Plant PathologyOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations