Skip to main content

New Chairman Paradoxes

  • Chapter

Abstract

Power is one of the most alluring but also one of the most intractable concepts in political science. It leads to a number of paradoxes (Brams, 1976, ch. 7), which continue to manifest themselves in real-life voting bodies like the European Community Council of Ministers (Brams and Affuso, 1985; Brams, 1985: 101–104). For example, one implication of some definitions of power is that the greater proportion of resources (such as votes) that an actor controls, the greater is his power. In this paper, we shall show that this implication in a certain context may be false.

The authors would like to thank Peter Mitter and Amnon Rapoport for their helpful comments on an earlier draft.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brams, S.J. (1975). Game Theory and Politics. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S.J. (1976). Paradoxes in Politics: An Introduction to the Nonobvious in Political Science. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S.J. (1982). “Omniscience and omnipotence: how they may help — or hurt — in a game”. Inquiry, 25: 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S.J. (1983). Superior Beings: If They Exist, Howe Would We Know? Game-Theoretic Implications of Omniscience, Omnipotence, Immortality, and Incomprehensibility. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S.J. (1985). Rational Politics: Decisions, Games, and Strategy. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S.J., and Affuso, P.J. (1985). “New paradoxes of voting power on the EC Council of Ministers”. Electoral Studies, 4: 187–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S.J., Felsenthal, D.S., and Maoz, Z. (1986). “Chairman paradoxes under approval voting”. In H. Berghel (ed.), Theory and Decision: Essays in Honor of Werner Leinfellner. Dordrecht: D. Reidel (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S.J., and Fishburn, P.C. (1983). Approval Voting. Cambridge: Birkhäuser Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S.J., and Hessel, M.P. (1983). “Staying power in sequential games”. Theory and Decision, 15: 279–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S.J., and Hessel, M.P. (1984). “Threat power in sequential games”. International Studies in Quarterly, 28: 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S.J., and Zagare, F.G. (1977). “Deception in simple voting games”. Social Science Research, 6: 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farquharson, R. (1969). Theory of Voting. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C., and Brams, S.J. (1983). “Paradoxes of preferential voting”. Mathematics Magazine, 56: 207–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handel, M.I. (1981). Weak States in the Internationl System. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, J. (1976). “Three approaches to the measurement of power in international relations”. International Organization, 30: 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maoz, Z. (1983). “Resolve, capabilities, and the outcomes of interstate disputes, 1816–1976”. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 27: 195–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, J.H. (1975). The Descriptive Analysis of Power. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, R.G., Bjurlf, B., and Blewis, G. (1983) “The power of the chairman”. Public Choice, 40: 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, R.G., and Frank, A.Q. (1982). “Sophisticated voting under the plurality procedure”. In P.C. Ordeshook and K.A. Shepsle (eds.), Political Equilibrium. Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A., and Golan, E. (1985). “Assessment of political power in the Israeli Knesset”. American Political Science Review, 79: 673–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wayman, F., Singer, J.D., and Goertz, G. (1983). “Capabilities, military allocations, and success in militarized disputes”. International Studies Quarterly, 27: 497–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brams, S.J., Felsenthal, D.S., Maoz, Z. (1986). New Chairman Paradoxes. In: Diekmann, A., Mitter, P. (eds) Paradoxical Effects of Social Behavior. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95874-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95874-8_18

  • Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0350-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-95874-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics