Abstract
The fundamental assumption of utilitarian theory is that we ought to choose our moral standards by rational criteria, more particularly, that we ought to choose the moral standards of the highest expected social utility.1 Here “expected” stands for “the expected value of ”, while “social utility” refers to the arithmetic mean (or possibly the sum) of all individuals’ utility levels. (Except in discussing the problem of optimum population, we can regard the number of individuals in society as given so that maximizing the arithmetic mean and maximizing the sum of individual utilities will be mathematically equivalent.) Of course, either definition of social utility assumes that individual utilities are cardinal quantities measurable on an interval scale and are interpersonally comparable in a meaningful manner. For convenience, I will sometimes use the term “social-utility function” instead of “social utility”. Note that many economists would employ the term “social welfare function” to describe what I will call “social utility” or the “social-utility function”.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arrow, K.J. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley.
Dworkin, R.M. (1977). Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Griffin, J. (1983). Well-Being, book MS in progress. Oxford.
Harsanyi, J.C. (1953). “Cardinal utility in welfare economics and in the theory of risk taking”. Journal of Political Economy, 61: 434 – 435. Reprinted in Harsanyi, 1976.
Harsanyi, J.C. (1955). “Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility”. Journal of Political Economy, 63: 309 – 321. Reprinted in Harsanyi, 1976.
Harsanyi, J.C. (1976). Essays on Ethics, Social Behavior, and Scientific Explanation. Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.
Harsanyi, J.C. (1983). “Basic moral decisions and alternative concepts of rationality”. Social Theory and Practice, 9: 231 – 244.
Harsanyi, J.C. (1984a). “Von Neumann-Morgenstern utilities, risk taking, and ethics”. Working Paper CP-443, Center for Research in Management, University of California, Berkeley. To appear in a volume honoring K.J. Arrow, edited by G.R. Feiwel.
Harsanyi, J.C. (1984b). “Utilitarian morality in a world of half-hearted altruists”. Working Paper CP-444, Center for Research in Management, University of California, Berkeley. To appear in a volume honoring K.J. Arrow, edited by W.P. Heller, R.M. Starr, and D. Starrett.
Hausner, M. (1954). “Multidimensional utilities”. In: R. M. Thrall et al. (editors), Decision Processes. New York: Wiley.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Samuelson, P.A. (1977). “When it is optimal to allocate money income in stipulated fractional shares”. In A.S. Blinder et al. (editors), Natural Ressources, Uncertainty, and General Equilibrium Systems. New York: Academic Press.
Scanlon, T.M. (1975). “Preference and urgency”. Journal of Philosophy, 72: 665 – 669.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg Wien
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harsanyi, J.C. (1986). Individual Utilities and Utilitarian Ethics. In: Diekmann, A., Mitter, P. (eds) Paradoxical Effects of Social Behavior. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95874-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95874-8_1
Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0350-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-95874-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive