Abstract
Whenever a neoclassical direct utility function is in close (even perfect) agreement with consumer behavior data, there is always an alternative direct utility function that agrees at least as closely with the same data. Existence of this equally well (if not better) fitting alternative to such a neoclassical direct utility function has considerable significance for the rational conduct of potential problem analysis in the policymaking arena. [We shall give an important example later in this note.] However the nonuniqueness of the neoclassical utility function on empirical data is rarely mentioned in the literature of economic theory, it appears to be little understood among economists generally, and most doctoral students are never told about it in advanced economic theory courses.
We are indebted W.A. Barnett, D. W. Jorgenson, P.A. Samuelson and S.N. White for helpful comments on the subject of this paper. Responsibility for errors and omissions is ours alone.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barnett, W.A. Consumer Demand and Labor Supply. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1981.
Basmann, R.L. “A Theory of the Serial Correlation of Stochastic Taste Changes in Direct Utility Functions.” Econometric Theory. 1 (1985): 192–210.
Basmann, R.L., Molina, D.J. and Slottje, D.J. “Budget Constraint Prices as Preference Changing Parameters of Generalized Fechner-Thurstone Direct Utility Functions.” American Economic Review. 73 (1983): 411–413.
Basmann, R.L., Diamond, C., Frentrup, C., White, S, S. “Variable Consumer Preferences, Economic Inequality, and the Cost-of-Living Concept. Part Two.” In Advances in Econometrics, Vol. IV. Eds R.L. Basmann and G.F. Rhodes, Jr. New York: JAI press, Inc. 1985.
Fisher, Franklin M. and Shell, Karl. “Taste and Quality Change in Pure Theory of the True Cost-of Living Index.” in Value, Capital, and Growth: Papers in Honor of Sir John Hicks. Edited by J.N. Wolfe. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press. 1968.
Harberger, A.L. “Three Basic Postulates for Applied Welfare Economics,” in Journal of Economics Literature, 9 (1971), pp. 785–797.
Konyus, A.A. “The Problem of the True Index of the Cost-of-Living. Economic Bulletin of the Institute of Economic Conjecture. Moscow; (1924): No. 9–10;
Konyus, A.A., English translation Econometrica. 7 (1936); 110–129.
McKenzie, G.W., Measuring Economic Welfare: New Methods, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
Samuelson, P.A. Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1948.
Samuelson, P.A. and Sato, Ryuzo. “Unattainability of Integrability and Definiteness Conditions in the General Case of Demand for Money and Goods.” American Economic Review. 74 (1984): 588–604.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Basmann, R.L., Slottje, D.J. (1999). Significance of the Nonuniqueness of Neoclassical Direct Utility Functions Especially When they are Empirically Confirmed. In: Slottje, D.J. (eds) Advances in Econometrics, Income Distribution and Scientific Methodology. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93641-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93641-8_6
Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-93643-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-93641-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive