Skip to main content
  • 228 Accesses

Abstract

It has been suggested that the size distribution of income follows a pure random walk. If true, this has serious implications for the effectiveness of U.S. Government income transfer policies. In this paper the random walk hypothesis is addressed by examining whether changes in the size distribution of income are independent. Conventional linear second-order time series analysis suggests that the first differenced series indeed are white noise processes. Results obtained with Mizrach’s SNT test, based on developments in the recent literature on nonlinear dynamics, strongly reject the independence null for changes in each of the income inequality measures examined. While this suggests that year-to-year shifts in the income distribution are not random, it does not show that U.S. Government income redistribution policies have been either efficient or effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson, A.B. (1970), “On the Measurement of Inequality,” Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 244 - 263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brock, W.A., W.D. Dechert, and J.A. Scheinkman (1987), “A Test for Independence Based on the Correlation Dimension,” working paper, Department of Economics, University of Wisconsin. [Revised version, Brock, W.A., W.D. Dechert, J.A. Scheinkman, and B. LeBaron (1996), Econometric Reviews, 15, 197-235.]

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brock, W.A, D.A. Hsieh, and B. LeBaron (1991), Nonlinear Dynamics, Chaos and Instability, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, R. and R.S. Tsay (1993), “Functional-Coefficient Autoregressive Models,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 298 - 308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cowell, F. (1977), Measuring Inequality, London: Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  6. DeJong, D.A., J.C. Nankervis, N.E. Savin, and C.H. Whiteman (1992), “Integration Versus Trend Stationarity in Time Series,” Econometrica, 60, 423 - 433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dickey, D.A. and W.A. Fuller (1979), “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427 - 431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hayes, K., D.J. Slottje, S. Porter-Hudak, and G. Scully (1990), “Is the Size Distribution of Income a Random Walk?” Journal of Econometrics, 43, 213 - 226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kakwani, N. (1980), “On a Class of Poverty Measures,” Econometrica, 48, 437 - 446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kwiatkowski, D., P.C.B. Phillips, P. Schmidt, and Y. Shin (1992), “Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity Against the Alternative of a Unit Root: How Sure are we that Economic Time Series have a Unit Root?” Journal of Econometrics, 54, 159 - 178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McLeod, A.I. and W.K. Li (1983), “Diagnostic Checking ARMA Time Series Models Using Squared-Residual Autocorrelations,” Journal of Time Series Analysis, 4, 269 - 273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mizrach, B. (1995), “A Simple Nonparametric Test for Independence,” unpublished working paper, Department of Economics, Rutgers University.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Perron, P. (1989), “The Great Crash, The Oil Price Shock and the Unit Root Hypothesis,” Econometrica, 57, 1361 - 1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Phillips, P.C.B. (1987), “Time Series Regression with a Unit Root,” Econometrica, 55, 227 - 302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Raj, Baldev and Daniel J. Slottje (1994). “The Trend Behavior of Alternative Income Inequality Measures in the United States From 1947-1990 and the Structural Break,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 12, pp. 479 - 488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rothman, P. (1992), “The Comparative Power of the TR Test Against Simple Threshold Models,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 7, S187 - S195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rothman, P. (1998), “Is the Size Distribution of Income Stationary?” Research on Economic Inequality, 8, 1 - 12.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Theil, H., (1967), Economics and Information Theory, Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tsay, R.S. (1991), “Detecting and Modeling Nonlinearity in Univariate Time Series Analysis,” Statistica Sinica, 1, 431 - 452.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zivot, E. and D.W.K. Andrews (1992), “Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10, 251 - 270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rothman, P. (1999). Independence and Changes in the Size Distribution of Income. In: Slottje, D.J. (eds) Advances in Econometrics, Income Distribution and Scientific Methodology. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93641-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93641-8_18

  • Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-93643-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-93641-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics