Advertisement

The “Forbidden” World of Chemistry

  • Nicolaos Demetrios Epiotis
Part of the Lecture Notes in Chemistry book series (LNC, volume 34)

Abstract

Hückel’s rule1, the Woodward-Hoffmann rules2, and, in a broader sense, Hückel Molecular Orbital (HMO) theory3 have had profound impact on chemistry in a way which is now well recognized and admired. Perhaps, the most important and time-lasting contribution of HMO theory has been the revelation of what in Valence Bond (VB) terms we call parity control of stereoselection4, or, in more familiar language, the revelation of the fact that a ground state molecule, a transition state, or, any molecular system, in general, can be thought of as the product of a “forbidden” or “allowed” union of two component fragments with the latter mode of union being energetically more favorable than the former one.

Keywords

Lone Pair Nonbonded Interaction Orbital Symmetry Symmetry Species Ground State Molecule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hückel, E., Z. Physik. 1931, 70, 204; ibid. 1932. 76, 628. Hückel, E., Z. Electrochem. 1937, 43, 752.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    a) Woodward, R.B.; Hoffmann, R. “The Conservation of Orbital Symmetry”; Verlag Chemie: Weinheim, 1970.Google Scholar
  3. (b).
    The independent recognition of orbital symmetry control of reaction stereochemistry by a number of brilliant investigators is documented in a recent article: Epiotis, N.D., Shaik, S., Zander, W “Rearrangements in Ground and Excited States”, De Mayo, P., Ed., Vol. 2; Academic Press, Inc.: New York, 1980.Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    a) Streitwieser, Jr., A., “Molecular Orbital Theory for Organic Chemists”; John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: New York, 1961.Google Scholar
  5. (b).
    Heilbronner, E.; Bock, H. “Das HMO-Modell und Seine Anwendung”; Verlag Chemie, Gmbh: Weinheim, 1968.Google Scholar
  6. 4.
    Epiotis, N.D., Larson, J.R., Eaton, H. “Unified Valence Bond Theory of Electronic Structure” in Lecture Notes in Chemistry, Vol. 29; Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, 1982.Google Scholar
  7. 5.
    The “father” of the FO approximation in “qualitative” MO theory is K. Fukui. Fukui, K., Yonezawa, T., Shingu, H. J., Chem. Phys. 1952, 20, 722, Fukui, K., Yonezawa, T., Nagata, C., Shingu, H. J., Chem. Phys. 1954, 22, 1433.Google Scholar
  8. 6.
    Dewar, M.J.S., “The Molecular Orbital Theory of Organic Chemistry”; McGraw- Hill: New York, 1969.Google Scholar
  9. 7.
    For applications of the F0-PM0 model to problems of structural chemistry and chemical reactivity, see:Google Scholar
  10. 7.
    b) Ref. 6.Google Scholar
  11. (d).
    Klopman, G., in “Chemical Reactivity and Reaction Paths”, Klopman, G., Ed.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1974.Google Scholar
  12. (e).
    Fukui, K., “Theory of Orientation and Stereoselection”; Springer-Verlag: New York and Berlin, 1975.Google Scholar
  13. (f).
    Fleming, I., “Frontier Orbitals and Organic Chemical Reactions”; John Wiley: New York, 1976.Google Scholar
  14. b) Slater, J.C., Phys. Rev. 1931, 38, 1109.Google Scholar
  15. d) Eyring, H., Frost, A.A., Turkevich, J., J. Chem. Phys. 1933, 1, 777.Google Scholar
  16. e) Pauling, L., J. Chem. Phys. 1933, 1, 280.Google Scholar
  17. h) Bobrowicz, F.W., Goddard, III, W.A., in, W.A., in “Modern Theoretical Chemistry”, Schaefer, III, H.F., Ed.; Plenum Press: New York, 1976.Google Scholar
  18. 9.
    Some important texts which contain discussions of fundamental VB theory are the following:Google Scholar
  19. 9.
    a) Pauling, L., Wilson, E.B., “Introduction to Quantum Mechanics”; McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.: New York, 1935.Google Scholar
  20. b) Glasstone, S., Laidler, K.J., Eyring, H., “The Theory of Rate Processes”; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1941.Google Scholar
  21. c) Eyring, H., Walter, J., Kimball, G.E., “Quantum Chemistry”; Wiley and Sons: New York, 1954.Google Scholar
  22. d) Slater, J.C, J.C., “Quantum Theory of Molecules and Solids”, Vol. 1; McGraw- Hill: New York, 1963.Google Scholar
  23. e) Sandorfy, C., “Electronic Spectra and Quantum Chemistry”; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1964.Google Scholar
  24. 10.
    Wheland, G.W., “Resonance in Organic Chemistry”; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1955.Google Scholar
  25. 11.
    For example, the work of R. Hoffmann and his collaborators in the area of inorganic chemistry, illustrates the importance of all orbitals in ground state molecular stereochemistry and the necessity for utilization of high order perturbation theory in dealing with problems of this type.Google Scholar
  26. 12.
    Molecules which shun deexcitation, i.e., “forbiddenness” relief, and exist as U-bound species are known and examples have been discussed in Ref. 4. The reason for U over H or D preference is maintenance of strong interfragmental overlap at the expense of excitation. A typical illustrator is acetylene which is U-bound in the linear Dαh geometry. This geometry is preferred over the transbent one although the latter involves H-bonding.Google Scholar
  27. 13.
    a) Wolfsberg, M., Helmholz, L.. J. Chem. Phys. 1952, 20, 837.Google Scholar
  28. c) Hoffmann, R. J., Chem. Phys. 1963, 39, 1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 14.
    Callomon, J.H., Hirota, E., Kuchitsu, K., Lafferty, W.J., Maki, A.G., Pote, C.S., in Landolt-Bornstein, “Numerical Data and Function Relationships in Science and Technology” Vol. 7, New Series, “Structure Data of Free Polyatomic Molecules”, Hellwege, K.H., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1976.Google Scholar
  30. 15.
    Hehre, W.J., Ditchfield, R., Radom, L., Pople, J.A., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 4796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 16.
    The C-D and C-A bond lengths were taken to be equal to the C-H bond length and tetrahedral geometries were used throughout. In the EHMO computation,the VOIE of D was set at -11.6 eV and that of A at -15.6 eV. In the ab initio computations, we used an STO-3G AO basis and set the nuclear charge of D at 0.9 and that of A at 1.1. The CI computations were carried out using a program kindly provided by Professor E. R. Davidson of this department.Google Scholar
  32. 17.
    The vicinal pi nonbonded overlap of two F’s is small and, hence, any pi conjugation in AF2 will produce an effect which is roughly the same as any pi conjugation in two AHF’s, i.e., the pi conjugation effect of the two F’s in AF2 is additive.Google Scholar
  33. 18.
    The EHMO calculations were carried out using standard bond angles and bond lengths. The ab initio value is taken from the work of Schleyer etal. cited in Table 1.Google Scholar
  34. 19.
    The experimental AE has been computed using the thermochemical data contained in: Cox, J.D., Pilcher, G., “Thermochemistry of Organic and Organometallic Compounds”; Academic Press: New York, 1970.Google Scholar
  35. 20.
    Chambers, R.D., “Fluorine in Organic Chemistry”; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1973. A compilation of data of bond dissociation energies and bond lengths of haloalkanes can be found in Table 7. 1, p. 138.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolaos Demetrios Epiotis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations