Skip to main content

Verbal Formulation of Fuzzy Dynamic Systems

  • Chapter
Current Topics in Cybernetics and Systems

Abstract

A quasi-natural language has been designed which can be used to formulate in fuzzy manner dynamic behavioral properties of systems. The language imitates English both syntactically and semantically. Its syntax also corresponds to that of APL, making computerized exploration of implied behavior possible without further translation. The semantic system including rules of inference is based on fuzzy set theory. The language is an improvement over earlier versions with regard to versatility and computer economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. A. Zadeh, “Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes” IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 3, 28–44 (1973).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. B. R. Gaines & L. J. Kohout, “Possible automata” Proc. Int. Symp. on Multiple-Valued Logic, Univ. of Indiana, Bloomington, Ind. 183-196 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy Sets as a Basis for a Theory of Possibility Memorandum UCB/ERL M77/12, Univ. of California, Berkeley (1977). To appear in Int. J. of Fuzzy Sets and Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. G. March, Handbook of Organizations (Chicago, Rand McNally, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. H. Coombs, R. M. Dawes & A. Tversky, Mathematical Psychology (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall, 1970).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Likert, The Human Organization (New York, McGraw-Hill, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. A. Zadeh, “The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning”, Part I, Inf. Sci 8, 199–249 (1975); Part II, Inf. Sci. 8, 301-357 (1975); Part III, Inf. Sci 9, 43-80 (1975).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. W. J. Kickert, An Example of Linguistic Modelling Report No. 30, Dept. of Ind. Engineering, Univ. of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. E. Wenstøp, “Deductive verbal models of organizations” Int. J. Man-Machine Studies 8, 293–311 (1976).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. F. E. Wenstøp, “Fuzzy set simulation models in a systems dynamics perspective” Kybernetes 6, 209–218 (1977).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Mizumoto, M. Umano & K. Tanaka, “Implementation of a fuzzy-set-theoretic data structure system”, 3rd Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, Tokyo, Japan, October 6–8 (1977) (to appear in ACM Trans. on Data Base Systems).

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. E. Iversen, A Programming Language (New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 The World Organisation of General Systems and Cybernetics

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wenstøp, F. (1978). Verbal Formulation of Fuzzy Dynamic Systems. In: Rose, J. (eds) Current Topics in Cybernetics and Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93104-8_242

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93104-8_242

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-93106-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-93104-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics