Advertisement

Selection and Non-Mendelian Variability

  • Marcus W. Feldman
  • Luigi L. Cavalli-Sforza
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Biomathematics book series (LNBM, volume 19)

Abstract

“It is clear that attitude toward a product or combination of the three products is not significantly related genetically to any other variable. However, the amount consumed of cigarettes is genetically related to anxiety. The amount consumed of cigarettes and coffee, and cigarettes and alcohol has a significant genetic component as well. The analysis definitely reveals that the consumption of cigarettes has a significant genetic component both by itself and in relation to one personality trait (anxiety) and the consumption of two other products (coffee and alcohol)”.

Keywords

Genotypic Variance Assortative Mating Cultural Transmission Population Genetic Model Significant Genetic Component 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bartholomew, D.J. 1973. Stochastic Models for Social Processes, 2nd Ed. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Cavalcanti, A.G.L. and Falcao, D.N. 1954. A new type of sex-ratio in Drosophila prosaltans Duda. Proc. IX Int. Congr. Genet., Bellagio, Caryologia, 6 (Suppl. II): 1233–1325Google Scholar
  3. Carraelli, D. and Karlin, S. 1975. Some population genetic models combining artificial and natural selection pressures I. One locus theory. Theor. Pop. Biol. 7: 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. and Feldman, M.W. 1973b. Cultural versus biological inheritance: Phenotypic transmission from Parents to Children. Amer. J. Him. Genet. 25:618–637.Google Scholar
  5. Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. and Feldman, M.W. 1976. Evolution of continuous variation: Direct approach through joint distribution of genotypes and phenotypes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73 (in press).Google Scholar
  6. Dietz, K. 1976. The effect of immigration on genetic control. Theor. Popul. Biol. 9: 58–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Falconer, D.S. 1960. Quantitative Genetics. Oliver and Boyd, London.Google Scholar
  8. Feldman, M.W. and Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. 1976. Cultural and biological evolutionary processes. Selection for a trait under complex transmission. Theor. Popul. Biol. 9 (in press).Google Scholar
  9. Feldman, M.W. and Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. 1977. Evolution of continuous variation II. On the effects of complex transmission and assortative mating. Theor. Popul. Biol. (to appear).Google Scholar
  10. Fine, P.E.M. 1974. The epidemiological implications of vertical transmission. Thesis. Univ. of London, Faculty of Medicine.Google Scholar
  11. Fisher, R.A. 1918. The correlations between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb. 52: 399–433.Google Scholar
  12. Jensen, A.R. 1969. How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement. Harvard Educ. Rev. 39: 1–123.Google Scholar
  13. Jensen, A.R. 1973. The differences are real. Psychology Today 7: 80–84.Google Scholar
  14. Karlin, S. 1977. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
  15. Karlin, S. and Carmelli, D. 1975. Some population genetic models combining artificial and natural selection pressures II. Two locus theory. Theor. Popul. Biol. 7: 123–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kimura, M. 1965. A stochastic model concerning the maintenance of genetic variability in quantitative characters. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 54: 731–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lande, R. 1976. The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci. Genet. Res. Camb. 26: 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Latter, B.D.H. 1970. Selection in finite populations with multiple alleles. II. Centripetal selection, mutation and isoallelic variation. Genetics 66: 165–186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Magni, G.E. 1952. Sex-ratio in Drosophila bifasciata. Rend. Inst. Lomb. di Sci. e Lett. 85: 391–411.Google Scholar
  20. Malagalowkin, C. 1958. Maternally inherited “sex-ratio” conditions in Drosophila willistoni and Drosophila paulistorum. Genetics 43: 274–285.Google Scholar
  21. Malagalowkin, C. and Paulson, D.F. 1957. Infective transfer of maternally inherited abnormal sex-ratio in Drosophila willistoni. Science 126: 32.Google Scholar
  22. Perry, A. 1973. Heredity, personality traits, product attitude and product consumption - an exploratory study. J. Marketing Res. X: 376–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Slatkin, M. 1970. Selection and polygenic characters. Proc. Bat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 66: 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Slatkin, M. and Lande, Russell. 1976. Niche width in a fluctuating environment -density dependent model. Amer. Natur. 110: 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Watson, G.S. 1960. The cytoplasmic “sex-ratio” condition in Drosophila. Evolution 4: 256–265.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcus W. Feldman
  • Luigi L. Cavalli-Sforza

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations