Circadian Ultrastructural Changes in Liver Cells

  • Chr. Jerusalem
  • O. Müller
  • H. v. Mayersbach

Abstract

Circadian dependent changes in liver cells are not only noticeable by biochemical and histochemical means3. The ultrastructure also exhibits during a period of 24-hours very drastic changes (Müller et al., 1966). After our own experience there seems to be a certain correlation between the general ultramorphology and the content of glycogen.

Keywords

Cage Hydroxide Citrate Assimilation Paraffin 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bharadway, T. P., and R. Love: Cytology of the rat liver cells during starvation and refeeding. J. nat. Cancer Inst. 23, 695–715 (1959).Google Scholar
  2. Higgins, G. M.: The diurnal cycle in the liver of the white rat. II. Food as a factor in the determination. Amer. J. Phys. 105, 173–181 (1933).Google Scholar
  3. Higgins, G. M., I. Berkson, and E. Flock: The diurnal cycle in the liver. I. Periodicity of the cycles with analysis of chemical constituent involved. Amer. J. Phys. 102, 673–682 (1932).Google Scholar
  4. Jerusalem, C.: Histometrische Untersuchungen zum Nukleinsäurestoffwechsel. II. Internat. Kongr. Histo- und Cytochem., Frankfurt/M., Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer 1964, p. 137–138.Google Scholar
  5. Jerusalem, C.: Histophotometrische Untersuchungen tagesrhythmischer Veränderungen. VIII. Int. Kongr. Anat. Wiesbaden 1965. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme 1965, p. 154–155.Google Scholar
  6. Leske, R.: Tageszyclen der Assimilisation und Dissimilisation des Leberglycogens. Deuxième Réunion Européenne d’Anatomie. Exerpta med. 70, 103 (1963).Google Scholar
  7. Leske, R.: Qualitative und quantitative Unterschiede des Leberglycogens. II. Internat. Kongr. f. Histo-und Cytochemie, Frankfurt/M., 1964. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer 1964, p. 139.Google Scholar
  8. Leske, R.: Fixationsunterschiede des Leberglycogens in Abhängigkeit rhythmusbedingter Schwankungen. VIII. Intern. Anatomenkongreß, Wiesbaden, 1965. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme 1965, p. 155–156.Google Scholar
  9. Leske, R., U. H. Von Mayersbach: Geschlechts-und Saisonveränderungen des Glycogentagesrhythmus. IV. Fed. Verg. v. med. biol. Verenigingen. 30 (1963). ( Druck: Medische Fakulteit, Nijmegen.).Google Scholar
  10. Leske, R., U. H. Von Mayersbach: Biorhythmic changes of liverglycogen. Acta morph. neerl. scand. 1966 (im Druck). Mayersbach, H. v.: Der Einfluß von tagesrhythmischen Veränderungen auf histochemische Untersuchungen. Acta morph. neerlando-scandinavica 6, 213–214 (1965).Google Scholar
  11. Leske, R., Biorhythmic und Histochemie 8th Intern. Congr. for Biological Rhythm. Hamburg 1963.Google Scholar
  12. Leske, R., R. Leske: Tageszyklische Untersuchungen an Rattenlebern. II. Symp. histol. internat. Lausanne 1961. Acta anat. (Basel) 48, 182 (1961).Google Scholar
  13. Leske, R., R. Leske: Physiologische Schwankungen des Glycogen-Tagesrhythmus. Acta morph. 12, 33–42 (1963).Google Scholar
  14. Leske, R. and K. Philippens: Circadian changes of succino dehydrogenase activity in liver. Histochemie (in press).Google Scholar
  15. Leske, R. and K. Philippens and P. H. K. Yap: Die Einflüsse biologischer Tagesschwankungen auf fermenthistochemische Untersuchungen. II. Internat. Kongr. f. Histo-und Cytochemie. Frankfurt/M. 1964. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer 1964, p. 139–140.Google Scholar
  16. Leske, R., P. H. K. Yap: Tagesrhythmische Schwankungen der Leberesterase. Histochemie 5, 297 bis 302 (1965).Google Scholar
  17. Mcbride, J. J.: Liver glycogenesis and fasting in the rat. The effect of glycose feeding on the water balance. J. Biol. Chem. 147, 333–339 (1943).Google Scholar
  18. Millonig, G.: A modified procedure for lead staining of thin sections. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 11, 736–739 (1961).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Müller, O., C. Jerusalem U. Von Mayersbach: Die Ultrastruktur der physiologischen Tagesschwankung in Leberzellen von Ratten. Z. Zellforsch. 69, 438–451 (1966).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Porter, K. R.: The endoplasmatic reticulum: Some current interpretations of its forms and functions. Biol. Struct. and Funct. 1, 127–155 (1961a).Google Scholar
  21. Porter, K. R.: The ground substance: Observations from electron microscopy. Cell 2, 621–675 (1961b).Google Scholar
  22. Porter, K. R. and M. A. Bonneville: An introduction to the fine structure of cells and tissues. Philadelphia, U.S.A.: Lea and Febiger 1962.Google Scholar
  23. Reynolds, E. S.: The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 17, 208–212 (1963).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scanga, F.: Atlas of electron microscopy: Biological applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publ. Co. 1964.Google Scholar
  25. Stadhouders, A. M.: Particulate glycogen. A correlated electronmicroscopical and biochemical study. Nijmegen: Thoben Offset 1965.Google Scholar
  26. Treadwell, C. R., and G. L. Tidwell: Glycogen and lipids in fasted and glucose fed rats. J. Biol. Chem. 149, 209–215 (1943).Google Scholar
  27. Yap, P. H. K.: Rhythmusunterschiede bei Lyo-und Desmo-Enzymen. VIII. Int. Kongr. Anat., Wiesbaden 1965. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme 1965, p. 158.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1967

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chr. Jerusalem
    • 1
  • O. Müller
    • 2
  • H. v. Mayersbach
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Cytology and HistologyUniversity of NijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Institute of PathologyUniversity of GrazAustria

Personalised recommendations