Skip to main content

Quantifying Corporate Preferences for Policy Analysis

  • Conference paper

Part of the Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems book series (LNE,volume 130)

Abstract

This paper discusses the quantification of preferences over ten major objectives of a corporation. The objectives concern personal, professional, and financial goals. The procedure used to elicit a ten-attribute von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function from a board member of Woodward-Clyde Consultants is presented. First the objectives and associated attributes are specified. Then the actual assessment is summarized. Uses of the results for examining policy are discussed.

Keywords

  • Utility Function
  • Utility Theory
  • Consult Firm
  • Desirable Level
  • Retirement Plan

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Debreu, G., “Topological Methods in Cardinal Utility Theory”, in K.J. Arrow, S. Karlin, and P. Suppes (Eds.), Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, 1959, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fishburn, P.C., “Independence in Utility Theory with Whole Product Sets”, Operations Research, Vol. 13, 28–45, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fishburn, P.C., Utility Theory for Decision Making, Wiley, New York, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  4. Keeney, R.L., “Multiplicative Utility Functions”, Operations Research, Vol. 22, 22–34, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Keeney, R. L., “Examining Corporate Policy Using Multiattribute Utility Analysis”, RM-75–36, I.I.A.S.A., Laxenburg, Austria, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Keeney, R.L., and H. Raiffa, Decision Analysis with Multiple Conflicting Objectives, to be published by Wiley, New York, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Keeney, R.L., and A. Sicherman, “An Interactive Computer Program for Assessing and Using Multiattribute Utility Functions”, RM-75–12, I.I.A.S.A., Laxenburg, Austria, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Raiffa, H., “Preferences for Multi-Attributed Alternatives”, RM-5868-DOT/RC, The RAND Corporation, April, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schlaifer, R.O., Analysis of Decisions under Uncertainty, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  10. von Neumann, J., and O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior 2nd Ed., Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Keeney, R.L. (1976). Quantifying Corporate Preferences for Policy Analysis. In: Thiriez, H., Zionts, S. (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 130. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-87563-2_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-87563-2_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-07794-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-87563-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics