Skip to main content

Risk Measurement and Size Effect on the Dutch Stock Market

  • Conference paper
Book cover Financial Modelling

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

  • 152 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper it is shown that there is an intervalling effect in the beta coefficients of the Dutch firms. The sign of the intervalling effect coefficient is generally negative, implying that most betas measured on short differencing intervals underestimate their asymptotic values. This further points out a significant relationship between the intervalling effect and the firm size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ariel R.A. (1987) A Monthly Effect in Stock Returns. Journal of Financial Economics 17, 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banz R.W.(1981) The Relationship between Return and Market Value of Common Stocks Journal of Financial Economics 9, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund T., Liljeblom, E., Löflund A. (1989) Estimating Betas Using Daily Data for a Small Stock Market. Journal of Banking and Finance 13, 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen K.J., Hawawini G.A., Maier S.F., Schwartz R.A., Whitcomb D.K. (1980) ‘Implications of Microstructure Theory for Empirical research on stock Price Behavior. Journal of Finance 35, 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen K.J., Hawawini G.A., Maier S.F., Schwartz R.A., Whitcomb D.K. (1983)Estimating and Adjusting for the Intervalling Effect Bias in Beta. Management Science 29, 135–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen K.J., Hawawini G.A., Maier S.F., Schwartz R.A., Whitcomb D.K. (1983) Friction in the Trading Process and the Estimation of Systematic Risk’. Journal of Financial Economics 12, 263–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corhay A. (1988) The Adjustment for the Intervalling Effect Bias in Beta: A Broader and Multiperiod Test. Working paper 88–26, European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corhay A. (1992) The Intervalling Effect Bias in Beta: a Note. Journal of Banking and Finance 16, 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corhay, A., Tourani Rad A. (1992) Beta Estimate of Dutch Firms: Alternate Methods. Vereniging van Beleggings Analisten Journal 4, 1992, 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corhay, A., Tourani Rad A. (1993) Return Interval, Firm Size and Systematic Risk on the Dutch Stock Market. Forthcoming in Review of Financial Economics

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimson, E. (1979) Risk Measurement when Shares are Subject to Infrequent Trading. Journal of Financial Economics 7, 197–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French K. (1980) Stock Returns and the Weekend Effect. Journal of Financial Economics 8, 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung W.K.H., Schwartz R.A., Whitcomb D.K. (1985) Adjusting for the Intervalling Effect Bias in Beta: A test Using Paris Bourse Data. Journal of Banking and Finance, 9, 443–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, N.R., Hess P. (1981) Day of the Week Effects and Asset Returns. Journal of Business 54, 579–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gultekin, M.N., Gultekin N.B. (1983) Stock Market Seasonalities: International Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 12, 469–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakonishok J., Levi M. (1982) Weekend Effects on Stock Returns: A Note. Journal of Finance 37, 883–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakonishok J., Smidt, J. (1988) Are Seasonal Anomalies Real? A Ninety-Year Perspective. Review of Financial Studies 1, 403–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McInish T.H., Wood, R.A. (1986) ‘Adjusting for Beta Bias: An Assessment of Alternate Techniques: A Note. The Journal of Finance, 41, 277–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roll R. (1981) A Possible Explanation of the Small Firm Effect. Journal of Finance 36, 879–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozeff M.S. Kinney WR. (1976), ‘Capital Market Seasonality: the Case of Stock Returns. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 379–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholes M., Williams J. (1977) Estimating Betas from Nonsynchronous Data. Journal of Financial Economics 5, 309–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Corha, A., Rad, A.T. (1994). Risk Measurement and Size Effect on the Dutch Stock Market. In: Peccati, L., Virén, M. (eds) Financial Modelling. Contributions to Management Science. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86706-4_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86706-4_18

  • Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0765-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-86706-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics