Skip to main content

Expert Systems as Cognitive Tools for Human Decision Making

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NATO ASI F,volume 35))

Abstract

Research on judgment and decision making has produced two classes of theories, i. e., descriptive theories which specify how humans actually make decisions, on the one hand, and prescriptive theories on the other hand. Prescriptive theories are formal procedures which one supposedly ought to apply to determine the best decision under some well defined conditions. Such conditions are usually specified by a relatively small number of facts or variables. Prescriptive rules are based upon rationality principles such as consistency, transitivity of choices, or the maximization of subjective utility (Edwards, 1984).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aschenbrenner, K. M., Albert, D. and Schmalhofer, F. (1984). Stochastic choice heuristics. Acta Psvcholocrica, 56, 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bose and Manvel (1984). Introduction to combinatorial theory. Wiley and Sons, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer, J. R. (1985). Decision making under uncertainty: A comparison of simple scalability, fixed-sample, and sequential-sampling models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 538–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, (1984). How to make good decisions. Acta Psvchologica, 6, 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, K. R. (1987) Toward a unified approach to the study of expert judgment. In J.L. Mumpower, L.E. Phillips, O. Renn, and V.R.R. Uppuluri (Eds): Expert judgment and expert systems. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahnemann, D. and Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R. L. (1982). Decision analysis: State of the field. Operations Research, 30, 803–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milton, L. E. (1987). Expert judgment and expert systems: A User’s Perspective. In J.L. Mumpower, L.E. Phillips, O. Renn, and V.R.R. Uppuluri (Eds): Expert judgment and expert systems. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumpower, J. L. (1987). Very simple expert systems: An application of judgment analysis to political risk analysis. In J.L. Mumpower, L.E. Phillips, O. Renn, and V.R.R. Uppuluri (Eds): Expert judgment and expert systems. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalhofer, F., Albert, D., Aschenbrenner, K. M. and Gertzen, H. (1986). Process traces of binary choices: Evidence for selective and adaptive decision heuristics. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalhofer, F. and Schaefer, I. (1986). Lautes Denken bei der Wahl zwischen benannt und beschrieben dargebotenen Alternativen. Sprache & Kognition, 2, 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalhofer, F. and Wetter, T. (1987). Kognitive Modellierung: Menschliche Wissensrepräsentationen und Verarbeitungsstrategien. In Richter & Christaller (Eds): Frühjahrsschule künstliche Intelligenz. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalhofer, F. and Gertzen, H. (1986). Judgment as a component decision process for choosing between sequentially available alternatives. In B. Brehmer, H. Jungermann, P. Loureus and G. Sevon (Eds): New directions in research on decision making. Elsevier, 139–150, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanteau, J. (1987). Psychological characteristics of expert decision makers. In J.L. Mumpower, L.E. Phillips, O. Renn, and V.R.R. Uppuluri (Eds): Expert judgment and expert systems. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B. and Lichtenstein, S. (1977). Behavioral decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, M. and Williams T. C. (1984). A theory of criterion setting with an application to sequential dependencies. Psychological Review, 91, 68–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schmalhofer, F. (1987). Expert Systems as Cognitive Tools for Human Decision Making. In: Mumpower, J.L., Renn, O., Phillips, L.D., Uppuluri, V.R.R. (eds) Expert Judgment and Expert Systems. NATO ASI Series, vol 35. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86679-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86679-1_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-86681-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-86679-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics