For many years the intraventricular conduction system had been considered as only two branches consisting of right and left bundle branches. Right bundle branch block and left bundle branch block have been known as distinct electrocardiographic entities for decades. Various investigators recognized and described other forms of intraventricular conduction block and coined various names for them (12). There were, however, no clearcut anatomic., physiologic., and electrocardiographic descrip tions of these various electrocardiographic entities. They, therefore, existed as curiosities without implying useful information for the clinician. In 1967, Rosenbaum and colleagues published their text Los Hemibloqueos, which clearly documented, described and demonstrated significance for electrocardiographic patterns signifying blocks in subdivision of the left bundle branch system. These included and superseded to a great extent many of the previously described, partial intraventricular conduction blocks. Since their publication the term, blhemiocks has become a unique and popular electrocardiographic term. There still exists a debate over (a) the real anatomic nature of the intraventricular conduction system and (b) over the true clinical implications of the various forms of hemiblocks. In this Chapter, the purpose is to explore what is known about hemiblocks and what implications this knowledge holds for the clinicians.
KeywordsIschemia Cardiomyopathy Dition Rosen Dium
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Chung, E. K. Electrocardiography: Practical Applications with Vectorial Principles. Hagerstown, Harper and Row, 1974.Google Scholar
- 2.Principles of Cardiac Arrhythmias. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins Co., 1971.Google Scholar
- 3.Demoulin, J. C. and Kulbertus, H. E. Histopathologic examination of concept of left hemiblock. Am. Heart J., 34:807–814, 1972.Google Scholar
- 7.James, T. N. The specialized conducting tissue of the atria. In Dreifus, L. S. and Likoff, W. eds. Mechanism and Therapy of Cardiac Arrhythmias. New York, Grune and Stratton, 1971.Google Scholar
- 8.Kulbertus, H. E. The magnitude of risk of developing complete heart block in patients with LAD-RBBB. Am. Heart J., 86:278,1973.Google Scholar
- 11.Lie, K. I., Wellens, H. J., Schulenberg, R. M., Becker, A. E., and Durrer, D. Factors influencing prognosis of bundle branch block complicating acute antero-septal infarction. The value of His bundle recordings. Circulation, 50:935, 1974.Google Scholar
- 13.Rosenbaum, M. B., Elizari, M. V., Lazzari, J. O., Kretz, A., and DaRuos, H. A. The clinical causes and mechanisms of intraventricular conduction disturbances. In Schlant, R. C. and Hurst, J. W. eds. Advances in Electrocardiography. New York, Grune and Stratton, 1972.Google Scholar
- 14.Rosenbaum, M. B., Elizari, M. V., and Lazzari, J. O. The Hemiblocks, Oldsman, Fla., Tampa Tracings, 1970.Google Scholar
- 15.Truex, R. C. Comparative anatomy and functional considerations of the cardiac conduction system. In De Carravello, A. P. ed. Specialized Tissues of The Heart. New York, American Elsevier Publishing Co., 1962.Google Scholar
- 17.Weisberger, C. L. Unpublished data.Google Scholar
- 18.Scariato, A., Kasparian, H., Duca, P., Gottlieb, R., and Brest, A. N. Coronary angiographic significance of left anterior hemiblock. Unpublished data.Google Scholar