Acceptance and Regression of a Strain-specific Lymphosarcoma in Mexican Axolotls
A closed colony 3 of dark (DD) and white (dd) Mexican axolotls (Ambystoma mexicanum) was analyzed, by skin allografting, for acceptance or rejection. From this analysis three major histocompatibility factors were identified and designated Ah, Bh, and Ch (1, 2). These factors behave as codominants and segregate as would be expected (2), thus: BhBh × ChCh → BhCh × BhCh → 1/4BhBh: 1/2BhCh: 1/4ChCh. Although the factors may turn out to be complex, they appear to berelatively rapid within the context of chronic rejection characteristic of urodeles. The onset of rejection occurs at 28 days ± 7 days. In addition to these factors, there are relatively “weak” factors that may produce chronic rejection initiated at about 90 days or later; no attempt has yet been made to analyze these in detail. Rapid chronic rejection has the characteristic manifestations (Plate I, upper left and right) described for several amphibia (4, 5, 6, 7): there is epidermal hyperplasia in the graft and replacement from the edges by the host’s epidermis; if the graft is pigmented, the epidermal cells become punctate but if the graft is unpigmented on a pigmented host, the host’s epidermal melanocytes move in with the replacing epidermis; there is marked vasodilation which is almost always followed by stasis and disintegration of the vascular bed.
KeywordsChronic Rejection Ambystoma Mexicanum Immunological Competence Mexican Axolotl Closed Colony
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.DeLanney, L. E.: Homografting of sexually mature Mexican axolotls. Amer. Zool. 1: 349, 1961.Google Scholar
- 2.Meier, A. H. and Delanney, L. E.: Histocompatibility studies in the Mexican axolotl. Amer. Zool. 2:431, 1962.Google Scholar
- DeLanney, L. E. and Prahlad, K. V.: unpublished.Google Scholar
- 4.Hildemann, W. H. and Haas, R.: Homotransplantation immunity and tolerance in the bullfrog. J. Immunol. 83:478–485, 1959.Google Scholar
- 7.Cohen, Nicholas: Tissue transplantation immunity in the adult newt, >Diemictylus liridescens. I. The latent phase: healing, restoration of circulation, and pigment cell changes in autografts and allografts. J. Exp. Zool. 163:157–172, 1965.Google Scholar
- 8.DeLanney, L. E., Prahlad, K. V. and Meier, A. H.: A malignant lymphoma in the Mexican axolotl. Amer. Zool. 4:279, 1964.Google Scholar
- 9.Green, H. N.: Immunological aspects of cancer. In Ciba Foundation Symposium, Carcinogenesis: Mechanism of Action (G. E. W. Wolstenholme and M. O’Connor, eds.). London: J. A. Churchill Ltd., 131, 1959.Google Scholar
- 10.Tyler, A.: A developmental immunogenetic analysis of cancer. >In Henry Ford Hospital International Symposium, Interactions in Normal and Neoplastic Growth. Boston: Little, Brown and Co. (Inc.), 533–571, 1962.Google Scholar
- 12.DeLanney, L. E., Blackler, M. K. and Prahlad, K. V.: The relationship of age to allograft and tumor rejection in Mexican axolotls. Amer. Zool. 7:763, 1967.Google Scholar
- 13.Ching, Y. and Wedgwood, R.: Immunologic responses in the axolotl, >Siredon mcxicanum. Jour. Immunol. 99:191–200, 1967.Google Scholar