The Photopigments in an Insect Retina

  • G. Höglund
  • K. Hamdorf
  • H. Langer
  • R. Paulsen
  • J. Schwemer

Abstract

Colour vision is not an exclusive property of vertebrates. Also insects can discriminate wavelengths. The best known example is the honeybee, as shown by training experiments (1) and electrophysiological recordings (2,3). The peripheral wavelength discrimination is accomplished by at least three receptor types. The spectral sensitivity of the receptors fairly well agrees with resonance spectra for rhodopsins (3), and bee heads contain retinol and retinal (4). These results suggest that the visual pigments in insects are rhodopsins, i. e. they consist of retinal bound to a protein.

Keywords

Migration Quartz Retina Tral Xenon 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    FRISCH, K. v.: Tanzsprache und Orientierung der Bienen. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    AUTRUM, H., V. von ZWEHL: Zur spektralen Empfindlichkeit einzelner Sehzellen der Drohne (Apis mellifica). Z. vergl. Physiol. 48, 8–12 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    AUTRUM, H., V. von ZWEHL: Die spektrale Empfindlichkeit einzelner Sehzellen des Bienenauges. Z. vergl. Physiol. 48, 357–384 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    GOLDSMITH, T.H., L.T. WARNER: Vitamin A in the vision of insects. J. Gen. Physiol. 47, 433–441 (1964).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    KNOLL, F.: Lichtsinn und Blütenbesuch des Falters von Deilephila livornica. Z. vergl. Physiol. 2, 329–380 (1925).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    ILSE, D.: Über den Farbensinn der Tagfalter. Z. vergl. Physiol. 8, 658–692 (1928).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    CRANE, J.: Imaginal behaviour of a Trinidad butterfly, Heliconius erato hydara Hewitson, with special reference to the social use of colour. Zoologica 40, 167–196 (1955).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    HÖGLUND, G., G. STRUWE: Pigment migration and spectral sensitivity in the compound eye of moths. Z. vergl. Physiol. 67, 229–237 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    DARTNALL, H.J.A.: The interpretation of spectral sensitivity curves. Brit. Med. Bull. 9, 24–30 (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    EPHRUSSI, B., G.W. BEADLE: A technique of transplantation for Drosophila. Amer. Nat. 70, 218–225 (1936).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    SCHWEMER, J., M. GOGALA, K. HAMDORF: Der UV-Sehfarbstoff der Insekten: Photochemie in vitro und in vivo. Z. vergl. Physiol. 75, 174–188 (1971).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    WALD, G., J. DURELL, R.C.C. ST. GEORGE: The light reaction in the bleaching of rhodopsin. Science 111, 179–181 (1950).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    HAMDORF, K., M. GOGALA, J. SCHWEMER: Beschleunigung der “Dunkeladaptation” eines UV-Rezeptors durch sichtbare Strahlung. Z. vergl. Physiol. 75, 189–199 (1971).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    DAUMER, K.: Reizmetrische Untersuchungen des Farbensehens der Bienen. Z. vergl. Physiol. 38, 413–478 (1956).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    HÖGLUND, G.: Pigment migration, light screening and receptor sensitivity in the compound eye of nocturnal Lepidoptera. Acta physiol. scand. 69, suppl. 282 (1966).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Höglund
    • 2
  • K. Hamdorf
    • 1
  • H. Langer
    • 1
  • R. Paulsen
    • 1
  • J. Schwemer
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für TierphysiologieRuhr-Universität BochumBochum-QuerenburgW. Germany
  2. 2.Department of PhysiologyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations