Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Qualitätssicherung durch Zusammenarbeit in der Chirurgie pp 423–465Cite as

Stand und Entwicklung in der Visceralchirurgie

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie ((KONGRESSBAND,volume 1995))

Summary

In the last five years there had been a dramatic change in the therapy of gallbladder diseases. Open cholecystectomy has been almost completely replaced by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In the period between June 1990 and 1995, 3411 patients with gallstone diseases were operated on in the Moabit Hospital/Berlin, and only 180 patients (5.3%) were treated primarily by open cholecystectomy. In the treatment of symptomatic gallstones, laparoscopic cholecystectomy showed a comparable or even better outcome in terms of complications, operation time, hospital stay, patient satisfaction, and mortality rate. The new standard in the treatment of gallstone disease is therefore laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Zusammenfassung

In den vergangenen fünf Jahren hat ein dramatischer Wandel in der Behandlung der Gallensteinerkrankungen stattgefunden. Die klassische Cholecystektomie wurde weitgehend von der laparoskopischen Cholecystektomie abgelöst. Im Zeitraum Juni 1990 bis März 1995 wurden im Krankenhaus Moabit/Berlin 3411 Patienten mit Gallensteinleiden operiert, davon nur noch 180 oder 5,3% primär klassisch. Bei der Behandlung der symptomatischen Cholecystolithiasis erbringt die laparoskopische Cholecystektomie hinsichtlich Komplikationen, OP-Zeit, Liegezeit und Patientenzufriedenheit sowie Letalität gleiche oder bessere Ergebnisse als die klassische Cholecystektomie. Der neue Standard bei der Behandlung der Cholecystolithiasis ist somit die laparoskopische Cholecystektomie.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Boeckl O, Waclawiczek HW (Hrsg) (1995) Standards in der Chirurgie. W Zuckerschwerdt Verlag, München Bern Wien New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ergebnisse Qualitätssicherung Nordrhein „Cholelithiasis/-zystitis“ (1993 und 1994). Projektgeschäftsstelle „Qualitätssicherung in der Chirurgie” bei der Ärztekammer Nordrhein, Tersteegenstraße 31, D-40474 Düsseldorf

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kraas E, Lôhde E, Gemperle A, Schairer W, Kleine U, Loss H (1993) 2000 laparoskopische Cholecystektomien im Krankenhaus Moabit-Berlin. Verdauungskrankheiten Jg 11, 4: 128–137

    Google Scholar 

  4. Neugebauer E, Troidl H, Spangenberger W, Dietrich A, Lefering R, The Cholecystectomy Study Group (1991) Conventional versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg 78: 150–154

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Siewert JR, Feussner H, Scherer A, Brune IB (1993) Fehler und Gefahren der laparoskopischen Cholecystektomie. Chirurg 64: 221

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Trede M, Troidl H, Herfarth C, Beger HG, Feussner H (1992) Ist die laparoskopische Cholecystektomie bereits als Goldstandard bei der blanden Cholezystolithiasis anzusehen? Langenbecks Arch Chir 377: 190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Adams ML CAPT (1990) The medical management of acute appendicitis in a nonsurgical environment: a retrospective case review. Military Med 155: 345

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Attwood SEA, Hill ADK, Murphy PG, Thornton J, Stephens RB (1992) A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery 112: 497–501

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Beecher HK (1959) Placebo and placebo reactors. In: Measurement of subjective responses. Quantitative effects of drugs. Oxford University Press, New York, S 65–72

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coldrey E (1959) Five years of conservative treatment of acute appendicitis. J Internat Coll Surg 32: 255–261

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eriksson S, Granström L (1995) Randomized controlled trial of appendicectomy versus antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 82: 166–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, Snyder SK, Hendricks JC, Smith RW, Custer III MD, Blake Harrison J (1994) A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 219: 725–731

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Götz F (1988) Die endoskopische Appendektomie nach Semm bei der chronischen Appendizitis. Endoskopie heute 2: 5–7

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hebebrand D, Troidl H, Spangenberger W, Neugebauer E, Schwalm T, Günther MW (1994) Laparoskopische oder klassische Appendektomie? Eine prospektiv randomisierte Studie. Chirurg 65: 112–120

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Institute for Acute Abdominal Diseases, Nan Kai Hospital, Tientsin and Acute Abdominal Condition Research Group, Tsunyi College, Kweichow (1978) Treatment of acute abdominal diseases by combined traditional Chinese and Western medicine. Chinese Med J 4: 11–16

    Google Scholar 

  16. Käufer C, Franz I, Löblich HJ, (1988) Akute Appendicitis. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II (Kongreßbericht 1988), S 63–69

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kum CK, Ngoi SS, Goh PMY, Tekant Y, Isaac JR (1993) Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopie and open appendicectomy. Br J Surg 80: 1599–1600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lau WY, Fan ST, Yiu TF, Chu KW, Suen HC, Wong KK (1986) The clinical significance of routine histopathologic study of the resected appendix and safety of appendiceal inversion. Surg Gynecol Obstet 162: 256

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lefering R, Troidl H, Ure BM (1994) Entscheiden die Kosten? Einweg-oder wiederverwendbare Instrumente bei der laparoskopischen Cholecystektomie. Chirurg 65: 317–325

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McEntee G, Pender D, Mulvin D, McCullough M, Naeeder S, Farah S, Badurdeen MS, Ferraro V, Cham C, Gillham N, Matthews P (1987) Current spectrum of intestinal obstruction. Br J Surg 74: 976–980

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B and the Laparoscopie Appendectomy Study Group (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopie appendectomy with open appendectomy. Am J Surg 169: 208–213

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rohr S, Thiry CL, de Manzini N, Perrauid V, Meyer C (1994) Laparoscopie vs open appendectomy in men: a prospective randomized study. Br J Surg (Suppl) 81: 6–7

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rutkow I (1995) Editorial: The importance of socioeconomic issues on surgical outcomes: What is the relevant endpoint? Eur J Surg (im Druck )

    Google Scholar 

  24. Salcedo-Wasicek MC, Thirlby RC (1995) Postoperative course after inguinal herniorrhaphy. A case-controlled comparison of patients receiving workers compensation vs patients with commercial insurance. Arch Surg 130: 29–32

    Google Scholar 

  25. Scheibe O (1995) Qualitätssicherung Baden-Württemberg. Pers Mitteilung

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schwalm T (1995) Laparoskopisehe oder konventionelle Appendektomie? Dissertation Universität Köln

    Google Scholar 

  27. Semm K (1982) Endoscopie appendectomy. In: Advances in pelviscopic surgery. Year Book Medical Publishers, Inc, 5: 34

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tate JJT, Dawson JW, Chung SCS, Lau W, Li AKC (1993) Laparoscopie versus open appendicectomy: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 342:633 —637

    Google Scholar 

  29. Trede M, Farthmann EH, Salm R, Troidl H, Feussner H, Schumpelick V (1994) Diskussionsforum. Welche laparoskopischen Eingriffe sehen Sie derzeit in ihrer Indikation als gesichert an? Langen-becks Arch Chir 379: 310–316

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Troidl H, Gaitzsch A, Winkler-Wilfurth A, Müller W (1993) Fehler und Gefahren bei der laparoskopischen Appendektomie. Chirurg 64: 212–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Troidl H, Bäcker B, Langer B, Winkler-Wilfurth A (1993) Fehleranalyse — Evaluierung und Verhütung von Komplikationen; ihre juristische Implikation. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl (Kongreßbericht 1993 ) 59–72

    Google Scholar 

  32. Troidl H (1993) The philosophy of patient-friendly surgery. In: Rosin RD (Ed) Minimal Access — Medicine and Surgery. Principles and Techniques. Radcliffe Medical Press, Oxford, pp 10–21

    Google Scholar 

  33. Turner JA, Deyo RA, Loeser JD, von Korff M, Fordyce WR (1994) The importance of placebo effects in pain treatment and research. JAMA 271:1609 —1614

    Google Scholar 

  34. Barlow AP, DeMeester TR, Boll CS, Eypasch EP (1989) The significance of the gastric secretory state in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Arch Surg 124: 937–940

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Nathanson LK (1992) Laparoscopic reduction, crural repair, and fundoplication of large hiatal hernia. Am J Surg 163: 425–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Dallemagne B, Weerts JM, Jehaes C, Markiewicz S, Lombard R (1993) Techniques and Results of Endoscopic Fundoplication. End Surg 1: 72–76

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. DeMeester TR, Bonavina L, Albertucci M (1986) Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Evaluation of primary repair in 100 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 204: 19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. DeMeester TR (1987) Definition, detection and pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease. In: DeMeester TR, Matthews HR (Eds) International Trends in General Thoracic Surgery. Benign Esophageal Disease, Vol 3. CV Mosby Company, St Louis, pp 99–127

    Google Scholar 

  39. DeMeester TR, Peters JH (1993) Fehler and Gefahren bei der laparoskopischen Antirefluxchirurgie. Chirurg 64: 230–236

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. DeMeester TR, Stein HJ, Fuchs KH (1991) Diagnostic studies in the evaluation of the esophagus: Physiologic diagnostic studies. In: Orringer MB (Ed) Shackelfords’s Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. 3rd ed. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 94–126

    Google Scholar 

  41. Eckardt VF (1988) Does healing of esophagitis improve esophageal motor function? Digestive Diseases and Sciences 33: 161–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Feussner H, Stein HJ (1994) Minimally Invasive Esophageal Surgery. Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery and Cardiomyotomy. Diseases of the Esophagus 7: 17–23

    Google Scholar 

  43. Fuchs KH (1993) Operative Procedures in Antireflux Surgery. End Surg 1: 65–71

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Fuchs KH, Freys SM, Heimbucher J, Thiede A (1994) Indikationen, Technik and Ergebnisse der laparoskopischen Antirefluxoperationen. Langenbecks Arch Chir, Suppl, 203–209

    Google Scholar 

  45. Fuchs KH, Heimbucher J, Freys SM, Thiede A (1994) Management of gastro-esophageal reflux disease 1995. Tailored concept of anti-reflux operations. Diseases of the Esophagus 7: 250–254

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fuchs KH, Freys SM, Heimbucher J, Fein M, Thiede A (1995) Pathophysiologic spectrum in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease in a surgical GI function laboratory. Diseases of the Esophagus 8: 211–213

    Google Scholar 

  47. Heimbucher J, Kauer WKH, Peters JH (1994) Physiologic basis of peptic ulcer therapy. In: Peter JH, DeMeester TR (Eds) Minimally invasive Surgery of the Foregut, St Louis QMP, 199–214

    Google Scholar 

  48. Koop H, Arnold R (1991) Long-term maintenance treatment of reflux esophagitis with omeprazole. Prospective study with H2-blocker-resistant esophagitis. Dig Dis Sci 36: 552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Rösch W (1992) Hat die Antirefluxchirurgie noch eine Indikation? — Aus gastroenterologischer Sicht. Chirurg Gastroenterol S Karger 8:179— 183

    Google Scholar 

  50. Stein HJ, Barlow AP, DeMeester TR, Hinder RA (1992) Complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Role of the lower esophageal sphincter, esophageal acid/alkaline exposure, and duodenogastric reflux. Ann Surg 216: 35–43

    Google Scholar 

  51. Watson A, Jenkinson LR, Ball CS, Barlow AP, Norris TL (1991) A more physiological alternative to total fundoplication for the surgical correction of resistant gastro-oesophageal reflux. Br J Surg 78: 1088–1094

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Milsom JW, Böhm BB, Decanini C, Fazio VW (1994) Laparoscopic oncologic proctosigmoidectomy with low colorectal anastomosis in a cadaver model. Surg Endosc 8: 1124–1126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Tate JJT, Kwok S, Dawson JW, Lau WY, Li AKC (1993) Prospective comparison of laparoscopie and conventional anterior resection. Br J Surg Nov 80: 1396–1398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Corbitt JD, Jr (1992) Preliminary experience with laparoscopic-guided colectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 2 (1): 79–81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Larach SW, Salomon MC, Williamson PR, Goldstein E (1993) Laparoskopie-unterstützte Kolektomie: Erfahrungen während der Lernperiode. Colo-proctology 1: 38–41

    Google Scholar 

  56. Cohen SM, Reissman P, Ulrich A, Wexner SD (1995) Are we being honest with our patients. Dis Colon Rectum, in press

    Google Scholar 

  57. McDermott JP, Devereaux DA, Caushaj PF (1994) Pitfall of laparoscopie colectomy: an unrecognized synchronous cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 37: 602–603

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Senagore AJ, Luchtfeld MA, MacKeigan JM, Mazier WP (1993) Open colectomy versus laparoscopic colectomy: are there differences? American Surgeon 59 (8): 549–554

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Musser DJ, Boorse RC, Madera F, Reed J (1994) Laparoscopic colectomy: At what cost? Surg Laparosc Endosc 4(1):1 —5

    Google Scholar 

  60. Van Ye TM, Cattery RP, Henry LG (1994) Laparoscopically assisted colon resections compare favorably with open technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc 4: 25–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Guillou PJ, Darzi A, Monson JRT (1993) Experience with laparoscopic colorectal surgery for malignant disease. Surgical Oncology Suppl 1 2: 43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Wexner SD, Cohen SM (1995) Port side metastasis after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy. Br J Surg 82: 295–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Cuesta MA, Meijer S, Borgstein PJ, Mulder CS, Sikkens AC (1993) Laparoscopie ultrasonography for hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancy. Br J Surg 80: 1571–1574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Feussner H, Kraemer SJ, Siewert JR (1994) Technik der laparoskopischen Ultraschalluntersuchung bei der diagnostischen Laparoskopie. Langenbecks Arch Chir 379: 248–254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Halpert RD, Feczko PJ (1993) Role of Radiology in the Diagnosis and Staging of Gastric Malignancy. Endoscopy 25: 39–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Kriplani AK, Kapur BML (1991) Laparoscopy for preoperative staging and assessment of operability in gastric carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 37: 441–443

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Murughia N, Paterson-Brown S, Windsor JA, Anthony-Miles WF, James-Garden 0 (1993) Early experience of laparoscopie ultrasonography in the management of pancreatic carcinoma. Surg Endosc 7: 177–181

    Google Scholar 

  68. Rösch T, Classen M (1992) Gastroenterologic Endosonography. Thieme, Stuttgart New York

    Google Scholar 

  69. Warshaw AL, Gu Z, Wittenberg J, Waltman AC (1990) Preoperative staging and assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg 125: 230–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Watt I, Stewart I, Anderson D, Bell G, Anderson JR (1989) Laparoscopy, ultrasound and computed tomography in cancer of the oesophagus and gastric cardia: a prospective comparison for detecting intra-abdominal metastases. Br J Surg 76: 1036–1039

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Phillips E, Caroll B, Fallas M, Pearlstein A (1994) Laparoscopie cholecystectomy in obese patients. The Amer Surg 60: 316–321

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Schirmer BD, Dic J, Edge SB et al (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the obese patient. Ann Surg 216: 146–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Nies C, Bartsch D, Rothmund M (1994) Laparoskopische Cholecystektomie bei schwerer Adipositas. Der Chirurg 65: 29–3266

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Stoppa RE, Rives JL, Warlaumont CR, Palot JR, Verhaeghe PJ, Delattre JF (1984) The use of Dacron in the repair of hernias of the groin. Surg Clin North Am 64: 269

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Lichtenstein IL, Schulman AG, Amid PK, Montllor MM (1989) The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 157:188 —193

    Google Scholar 

  76. Shouldice EE (1944) Surgical treatment of hernia. Ontario Med Rev 11: 43

    Google Scholar 

  77. Stoppa R (1985) Hernia of the Abdominal wall. In: Chevrel JP (Ed) Surgery of the Abdominal wall. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 155–224

    Google Scholar 

  78. Largiadèr F, Säuberli H, Wicki O (1993) Checkliste Viszerale Chirurgie, 7. Aufl. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart New York

    Google Scholar 

  79. Schumpelick V (1990) Hernien, 2. Aufl. Enke, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chirurgische Abteilung, Krankenhaus Moabit, Turmstraße 21, 10559, Berlin, Deutschland

    E. Kraas, E. Löhde, F.-R. Müller & H. Raude

  2. Chirurgische Abteilung und Ludwig-Boltzmann-Institut für gastroenterologische Chirurgie, LKA Salzburg, A-5020, Salzburg, Austria

    O. Boeckl, P. Sungler & P. M. Heinerman

  3. Chirurgische Klinik Köln-Merheim, II. Lehrstuhl für Chirurgie, Universität zu Köln, Ostmerheimer Straße 200, 51109, Köln, Deutschland

    H. Troidl, Ulla Holthausen & R. Lefering

  4. Ludwigshafen, Deutschland

    K. Schönleben

  5. Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin, Chirurgische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Steinhövelstraße 9, 89075, Ulm, Deutschland

    R. Kunz

  6. Rostock, Deutschland

    B. Helms

  7. Chirurgische Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik, Josef-Schneider-Straße 2, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland

    K.-H. Fuchs, J. Heimbucher, S. M. Freys & M. Fein

  8. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 3000 West Cypress Creek Road, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 33309, USA

    J. Pfeifer & S. D. Wexner

  9. Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, München, Deutschland

    H. Feussner, U. Fink, K. Boettcher & J. R. Siewert

  10. Klinik für Allgemeinchirurgie, Marienhospital, Böheimstraße 37, 70199, Stuttgart, Deutschland

    B. Schlossnickel, J. Eberhard, M. Ulrich & R. Bittner

  11. Klinikum Mannheim, Chirurgische Universitätsklinik, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland

    K. Werthmann, M. Schmid, E. Stark, A. Friedemann & M. Trede

  12. Klinik für Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsspital, Rämistrasse 100, CH-8091, Zürich, Schweiz

    R. Schlumpf, J. Wydler, P. Cassina, H.-P. Simmen & F. Largiadèr

Authors
  1. E. Kraas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Löhde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F.-R. Müller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H. Raude
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. O. Boeckl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. P. Sungler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. P. M. Heinerman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. H. Troidl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ulla Holthausen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. R. Lefering
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. K. Schönleben
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. R. Kunz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. B. Helms
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. K.-H. Fuchs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. J. Heimbucher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. S. M. Freys
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. M. Fein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. J. Pfeifer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. S. D. Wexner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. H. Feussner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. U. Fink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. K. Boettcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. J. R. Siewert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. B. Schlossnickel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. J. Eberhard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  26. M. Ulrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  27. R. Bittner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  28. K. Werthmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  29. M. Schmid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  30. E. Stark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  31. A. Friedemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  32. M. Trede
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  33. R. Schlumpf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  34. J. Wydler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  35. P. Cassina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  36. H.-P. Simmen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  37. F. Largiadèr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Steinhölzle 16, D-89197, Westerstetten-Vorderdenkental, Deutschland

    W. Hartel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kraas, E. et al. (1995). Stand und Entwicklung in der Visceralchirurgie. In: Hartel, W. (eds) Qualitätssicherung durch Zusammenarbeit in der Chirurgie. Langenbecks Archiv für Chirurgie, vol 1995. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85235-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85235-0_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60425-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-85235-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation