Monte Carlo Simulations of Dilute Ising Models

  • W. Selke
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics book series (SPPHY, volume 72)

Abstract

Results of recent Monte Carlo studies on random-bond and random-site Ising models are reviewed. In the two-dimensional case, the simulations clarify a controversy between conflicting renormalization group theories, which predict different critical exponents. Evidence for a crossover from the critical behaviour of the perfect model to the dilution-dominated critical regime is found for the three-dimensional model.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    A.B. Harris: J. Phys. C7, 1671 (1974)ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    V.S. Dotsenko and V1S. Dotsenko: J. Phys. C15, 495 (1982); J. Phys. C15, L557 (1982); Adv. Phys. 32, 129 (1983)ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    B.N. Shalaev: Sov. Phys. Solid State 26, 1811 (1984)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. Shankar: Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2466 (1987); Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2390 (1988)CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    A.W.W. Ludwig: Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2388 (1988)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    V.B. Andreichenko, V1.S. Dotsenko, W. Selke, and J.-S. Wang: Nuclear Physics B344, 531 (1990)ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    J.-S. Wang, W. Selke, Vl.S. Dotsenko, and V.B. Andreichenko: Europhys. Lett. 11, 301 (1990)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    R.H. Swendsen and J.-S. Wang: Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 86 (1987); J.-S. Wang, and R.H. Swendsen: Physica A167, 565 (1990)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Vl.S. Dotsenko, W. Selke, and A.L. Talapov: Physica A170, 278 (1991)ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    D. Kandel, R. Ben-Av, and E. Domany: Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 941 (1990); P. Grassberger and H. Freund: J. Phys. A22, 4045 (1989)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    M. Hagen, R.A. Cowley, R.M. Nicklow, and H. Ikeda: Phys. Rev. 36, 401 (1987)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    S.G.W. Colborne and A.J. Bray: J. Phys. A22, 2505 (1989); H. Takano and S. Miyashita: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 58, 3871 (1989)ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    K. Ziegler: Nuclear Physics B344, 499 (1990)ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    M. Inoue: Preprint (1991)Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    H.-O. Heuer: Preprint (1991)Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    J.T. Chayes, L. Chayes, D.S. Fisher, and T. Spencer: Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2999 (1986)CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    I.O. Mayer, A.I. Sokolov, and B.N. Shalaev: Ferroelectrics 95, 93 (1989); see also G. Jug: Phys. Rev. B27, 609 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    H.-O. Heuer: Europhys. Lett. 12, 551 (1990); Phys. Rev. B42, 6476 (1990)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    J.-S. Wang, M. Wöhlert, H. Mühlenbein, and D. Chowdhury: Physica A166, 173 (1990)ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    M. Fähnle, T. Haley, U. Staaden, and P. Braun: Festkörperprobleme 30, 425 (1991); T. Holey and M. Fähnle: Phys. Rev. B41, 11709 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    G.S. Pawley, R.H. Swendsen, D.J. Wallace, and K.G. Wilson: Phys. Rev. B29, 4030 (1984)ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Selke
    • 1
  1. 1.IFF des Forschungszentrums JülichJülich 1Fed. Rep. of Germany

Personalised recommendations