The Intrinsic Lagrangian Metric and Stress Variables
Strain and stress, and their rates, are fundamental concepts. Their modeling largely depends on basic kinematic choices that need to be well defined and uncontested. As shown in , to which we refer also for its extensive bibliography, this is not the case in large deformation theory. Even in the simplest case without any microstructure that we consider in this paper, many insufficiencies, inadequacies and inconsistencies remain, which are not sufficiently recognized.
KeywordsLinear Space Material Body Eulerian Approach Material Segment Space Rand
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- HILL R, “On constitutive inequalities for simple material. I and II”, J. Mech. Phys. Solids“, Vol. 16, 229–242 and 315–322, 1968Google Scholar
- PERIC Dj., OWEN D.R.J., “A model for finite strain elastoplasticity”, Proc. Sd Int. Conf. on Comput. Plasticity, Barcelonne, OWEN, HINTON, ONATE editors, Pineridge Press, Swansea U.K., 1989Google Scholar
- DOGUI A. and SIDOROFF F., “Large strain formulation of anisotropic elasto-plasticity for metal forming”. In “Computational methods for predicting materials processing defects”, M. Predeleanu Ed., Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1987Google Scholar
- KLEIBER M. and RANIECKI B., “Elastic-Plastic Materials at Finite Strains”, in “Plasticity today” Ed A. Sawczuk, 1983Google Scholar
- ROUGEE P., “Formulation Lagrangienne Intrinsèque en Mécanique des Milieux Continus”, Journal de mécanique, Vol. 18, n°1, 7–32, 1980Google Scholar
- PHAM MAU QUAN, “Introduction à la géométrie des variétés différentielles”, Dunod Ed. Paris, 1968Google Scholar
- ROUGEE P., “Kinematics of finite deformations”(to appear)Google Scholar