Advertisement

Reliability Based Inspection Strategy for a Highway Bridge

  • A. M. Sommer
  • A. S. Nowak
  • P. Thoft-Christensen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Engineering book series (LNENG, volume 76)

Abstract

Planning of inspections is an important part of a bridge management system. It has been based mostly on judgement, and some countries have only one type of periodical inspection of steel bridges. The intervals between inspections are usually between 1 and 6 years. Other countries have superficial inspections every year or more often and more detailed inspections every 3–5 years. However, with limited resources available for maintenance there is a growing interest in optimization of inspection strategies. Sørensen & Thoft-Christensen [1] considered the problem of concrete bridges subjected to corrosion of reinforcement. An optimum approach with two types of inspection was determined for a T-beam. Sommer & Thoft-Christensen [2] described the work done on optimization of inspection strategies.

Keywords

Shear Capacity Live Load Moment Capacity Corrosion Parameter Inspection Strategy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Sorensen, J.D., P. Thoft-Christensen, Integrated Reliability-Based Optimal Design of Structures, Proc. IFIP WG 7.5, Conference on Reliability and Optimization of Structural Systems (ed. P. Thoft-Christensen), Springer-Verlag, Lecture Notes in Engineering, Vol. 33, 1987, pp. 385–398.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Sommer, A.M., P. Thoft-Christensen, Inspection and Maintenance of Marine Steel Structures - State-of-the-Art, Structural Reliability Theory, Paper no. 74, The University of Aalborg, Denmark, 1990.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Kayser, J.R., The Effects of Corrosion on the Reliability of Steel Girder Brid-ges, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Michigan, 1988.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Komp, M.E., Atmospheric Corrosion Ratings of Weathering Steels–Calculation and Significance, Materials Performance 26 (7), 1987, pp. 42–44.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Albrecht, P., A.H. Naeemi, Performance of Weathering Steel in Bridges, Report 272, NCHRP, Transportation Research Board, Washington, July 1984.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    PROBAN-2, User’s Manual, A.S. Veritas Research Report No. 892024, Hovik, Norway, 1989.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Hong, Y.K., Live Load Models for Girder Bridges, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Michigan, 1990.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Nowak, A.S., Y.K. Hong and E.S. Hwang, Calculation of Load and Resistance Factors for OHBDC 1990, Report UMCE 90–06, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, April 1990.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Nowak, A.S. and Y.K. Hong, Bridge Live Load Models, ASCE, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 117, No. 9, September 1991, pp. 2757–2767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing, Geneva, Switzerland 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. M. Sommer
    • 1
  • A. S. Nowak
    • 2
  • P. Thoft-Christensen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Building Technology and Structural EngineeringUniversity of AalborgAalborgDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations