Place of Activated Charcoal and Gastric Emptying in Acute Toxic Ingestions: A Critical Reappraisal
The primary concern of the physician confronted to an acutely poisoned patient should be to support vital functions and to do no additional harm. It should always be kept in mind during therapeutic decisions thought to limit or antagonize toxic effects. Iatrogenic complications induced by a therapy of unproven clinical usefulness are unacceptable. Especially in the recent years, the relative safety and efficacy of the procedures intended to prevent gastrointestinal absorption of ingested toxins have been critically reevaluated.
KeywordsGastric Emptying Activate Charcoal Aspiration Pneumonia Gastric Lavage Gastric Aspiration
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Young MF, Bivins HG (1991) Evaluation of gastric emptying using radionuclides: Gastric lavage versus ipecac-induced emesis. Ann Emerg Med 20:952Google Scholar
- 10.Curtis RA, Barone J, Giacona N (1984) Efficacy of ipecac and activated charcoal/cathartic. Prevention of salicylate absorption in simulated overdose. Arch Intern Med 144:48–52Google Scholar
- 12.Decker WJ, Shpall RA, Corby DG, Combs HF, Payne CE (1969) Inhibition of aspirin absorption by activated charcoal and apomorphine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 4:710–713Google Scholar