Advertisement

Dynamic Cycle of Dissolved Organic Carbon and Marine Productivity

  • Yoshimi Suzuki
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 15)

Abstract

Dissolved organic matter (DOM) has an important role in ocean chemistry, in the remineralization of inorganic nutriens, feed web by heterotrophic organisms or as ligand of trace metals. Recent measurements of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentration in seawater using a high temperature catalytic oxidation (HTCO) method influenced strongly the biogeochemical ocean community. The HTCO method produced substantially higher values with more possibilities to be related to the consumption of oxygen. The first diel observations of DOC concentrations were done during the bloom study of JGOFS in 1989. DOC concentrations changed from 20 μM C to 50 μM C. This change is primarily due to the physical mixing of water and to biological processes. It was observed that there is a very weak negative correlation between the DOC inventory (0–50 m depth) and primary production. It seems that the rate of decomposition of DOC or DOM affects the rate of primary production. Using a two box model the DOM downward flux was calculated. It is likely that the DOM downward flux of about 5 GtC yr-1 plays an important role in the oceanic carbon cycle. The turnover time of DOC is calculated to be 2.9 years in the upper ocean layers and 170 years in the deep waters.

Keywords

Particulate Organic Carbon Dissolve Organic Carbon Concentration Dissolve Organic Matter Spring Bloom Dissolve Organic Carbon Pool 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bacastow R, Maier-Reimer (1991) Dissolved organic carbon in modeling oceanic new production. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 5:71–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger WH (1989) Global maps of ocean productivity. In: Berger WH, Smetacek VS, Wefer G (eds) Productivity of the ocean; present and past. Dahlem Workshop, Berlin, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 429–455Google Scholar
  3. Broecker WS, Peng T-H (1982) Tracers in the sea. ELDIGIO Press, Columbia University, Palisades, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Burney CM, Johnson KM, Lavoie DM, Sieburth JMCN (1979) Dissolved carbohydrate and microbial ATP in the North Atlantic: concentrations and interactions. Deep Sea Res. 26A:1267–1274Google Scholar
  5. Burney CM, Davis PG, Johnson KM, Sieburth JMcN (1981) Dependence of dissolved carbohydrate concentrations upon small scale nanoplankton and bacterioplankton distributions in the western Sargasso Sea. Marine Biology 65:289–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Bair HJW, Fransz HG, Ganssen GM, Gieskes WW, Mook WG, Steel JH (1989) Towards a joint global ocean flux study: Rationale and objectives. In: Oceanography 1988, UNAM Press, Mexico DF. pp 11–34Google Scholar
  7. Duursma EK (1961) Dissolved organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in the sea. Netherland J. Sea Reseach 1:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emerson S, Quay P, Stump C, Wilbur D, Knox M (1991) O2, Ar, N2 and Rn-222 in surface waters of the subarctic ocean: Net biological O2 production. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 5:46–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Holmes RW, Williams PM, Eppley RW (1967) Red water in La Jolla Bay, 1964–1966. Limnology and Oceanography 12:503–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kirchman DL, Suzuki Y, Garside C, Ducklow HW (1991) High turnover rates of dissolved organic carbon during a spring phytoplankton bloom. Nature 352:612–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Martin JH, Fitzwater S, Hunter C (1991) Primary productivity data. In: Slagle R, Heimer-dinger G (eds) Joint Global Ocean Flux Study, data report North Atlantic Bloom Experiment April-July 1989Google Scholar
  12. Mel’nikov IA, Pavlov GL (1978) Characteristics of organic carbon distribution in the waters and ice of the Arctic Basin. Oceanology 18:163–168Google Scholar
  13. Peltzer ET, Brewer PG, Suzuki Y, Sugimura Y (1992, submitted) Measurement of dissolved organic carbon in seawater by high temperature catalytic oxidation. J. Marine ResearchGoogle Scholar
  14. Rau GH, Takahashi T, Des Marais DJ, Repeta DJ, Martin JH (1992) The relationship between δ13C of organic matter and [CO2(aq)] in ocean surface water Data from a JGOFS site in the northeast Atlantic Ocean and a model. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 56:1413–1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Revelle R (1990) Letter in Forum section. Issues Sience Technology 7(No 2):21–22Google Scholar
  16. Strickland JDH (1970) Introduction. In: Steele JH (ed) Marine food chains. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, pp 3–5Google Scholar
  17. Suzuki Y, Tanoue E (1991) Dissolved organic carbon enigma-Implication for ocean margin. In: Mantoura RFC, Martin JM, Wollast R (eds) Ocean margin processes in global change. Dahlem Workshop, Berlin, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 18–23Google Scholar
  18. Suzuki Y, Tanoue E, Ito H (1992) High temperature catalytic oxidation method for dissolved organic carbon determination in seawater-examination and improvement. Deep Sea Research 39: 185–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Toggweiler JR (1989) Is the downward dissolved organic matter (DOM) flux important in carbon transport? In: Berger WH, Smetacek VS, Wefer G (eds) Productivity of the ocean; present and past. Dahlem Workshop, Berlin, John Wiley & Sons New York, pp 65–83Google Scholar
  20. Williams PJLeB (1975) Biological and chemical aspects of dissolved organic material in sea water. In: Riley JP, Skirrow G (eds) Chemical Oceanography vol 2, Academic Press, pp 301–363Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshimi Suzuki
    • 1
  1. 1.Geochimical LaboratoryMeteorological Research InstituteTsukuba, Ibaraki 305Japan

Personalised recommendations