Abstract
Ethical considerations, coupled with the relative inaccessibility of the uterine lumen, severely limit the opportunities to examine closely or to manipulate experimentally the crucial events taking place during the first 12 weeks of gestation in humans. Researchers have therefore turned to animal models, or recently to in vitro culture systems in order to investigate many of the processes involved. However, the extreme diversity displayed amongst mammals in terms of the reproductive strategies employed, and in particular in the type of placentation that has evolved, means that questions must be asked concerning the validity of animal models. Equally, as evidence emerges of the complexity of the dialogue that takes place between the blastocyst and endometrium at the time of implantation, the limitations of in vitro systems are being exposed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Mossman HW (1987) Vertebrate fetal membranes. Macmillian, London
Steven DH (ed) (1975) Comparative placentation. Essays in structure and function. Academic, London
Luckett WP (1974) Comparative development and evolution of the placenta in primates. Contrib Primatol 3: 142–234
Geisert RD, Brookbank JW, Roberts RM, Brazer FW (1982) Establishment of pregnancy in the pig. II. Cellular remodelling of the porcine blastocyst during elongation on day 12 of pregnancy. Biol Reprod 27: 941–955
Aitken RJ, Burton J, Hawkins J, Kerr-Wilson R, Short RV, Steven DH (1973) Histological and ultrastructural changes in the blastocyst and reproductive tract of the roe deer, Capreolus capreolus, during delayed implantation. J Reprod Fertil 34: 481493
Denker H-W (1990) Trophoblast-endometrial interactions at embryo implantation: a cell biological paradox. In: Denker H-W, Aplin JD (eds) Trophoblast invasion and endometrial receptivity. Plenum, New York, pp 3–29 (Trophoblast research, vol 4 )
Simmen RCM, Simmen FA (1990) Regulation of uterine and conceptus secretory activity in the pig. J Reprod Fertil [Suppl] 40: 279–292
Leroy F, van Heock J, Bogaert C (1976) Hormonal control of pinocytosis in the uterine epithelium of the rat. J Reprod Fertil 47: 59–62
Guillomot M, Flechon J-E, Wintenberger-Torres S (1981) Conceptus attachment in the ewe: an ultrastructural study. Placenta 2: 169–182
Heap RB, Hamen M, Allen WR (1982) Studies on oestrogen synthesis by the preimplanation equine conceptus. J Reprod Fertil [Suppl] 32: 343–352
Geisert RD, Zavy MT, Moffatt RJ, Blair RM, Yellin T (1990) Embryonic steroids and the establishment of pregnancy in pigs. J Reprod Fertil [Suppl] 40: 293–305
Stroband HWJ, van der Lende T (1990) Embryonic and uterine development during early pregnancy in pigs. J Reprod Fertil [Suppl] 40: 261–277
King GJ, Atkinson BA, Robertson HA (1982) Implantation and early placentation in domestic ungulates. J Reprod Fertil [Suppl] 31: 17–30
Wango EO, Wooding FBP, Heap RB (1990) The role of trophoblast binucleate cells in implantation in the goat: a quantitative study. Placenta 11: 381–394
Wooding FBP (1982) The role of the binucleate cell in ruminant placental structure. J Reprod Fertil [Suppl] 31: 31–39
Allen WR (1982) Immunological aspects of the endometrial cup reaction and the effect of xenogeneic pregnancy in horses and donkeys. J Reprod Fertil [Suppl] 31: 57–94
Donaldson WL, Zhang CH, Oriol JG, Antczak DF (1990) Invasive equine trophoblast expresses conventional class 1 major histocompatibility complex antigens. Development 110: 63–71
Schlafke S, Enders AC (1975) Cellular basis of interaction between trophoblast and uterus at implantation. Biol Reprod 12: 41–65
Morris JE, Potter SW (1990) An in vitro model for studying interactions between mouse trophoblast and uterine epithelial cells. In: Denker H-W, Aplin JD (eds) Trophoblast invasion and endometrial receptivity. Plenum, New York, pp 51–69 (Trophoblast research, vol 4 )
Hohn H-P, Denker H-W (1990) A three-dimensional organ culture model for the study of implantation of rabbit blastocyst in vitro. In: Denker H-W, Aplin JD (eds) Trophoblast invasion and endometrial receptivity. Plenum, New York, pp 71–95 (Trophoblast research, vol 4 )
Lindenberg S, Hyttel P, Sjogren A, Greve T (1989) A comparative study of attachment of human, bovine and mouse blastocysts to uterine epithelial monolayer. Hum Reprod 4: 446–456
Samuel CA, Perry JS (1972) The ultrastructure of pig trophoblast transplanted to an ectopic site in the uterine wall. J Anat 113: 139–149
Cowell TP (1969) Implantation and development of mouse eggs transferred to the uteri of non-progestational mice. J Reprod Fertil 19: 239–245
Carson DD, Wilson OF, Dutt A (1990) Glycoconjugate expression and interactions at the cell surface of mouse uterine epithelial cells and preimplantation — stage embryos. In: Denker H-W, Aplin JD (eds) Trophoblast invasion and endometrial receptivity. Plenum, New York, pp 211–241 (Trophoblast research, vol 4)
Kaufman MH (1983) The origin, properties and fate of trophoblast in the mouse. In: Loke YW, Whyte A (eds) Biology of trophoblast. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 23–68
Pijnenborg R, Robertson WB, Brosens I, Dixon G (1981) Trophoblast invasion and the establishment of haemochorial placentation in man and laboratory animals. Placenta 2: 71–92
Enders AC, Welsh AO, Schlafke S (1985) Implantation in the rhesus monkey: endometrial responses. Am J Anat 173: 147–169
Bulmer JN, Ritson A, Pace D (1990) Endometrial leukocytes in human pregnancy. In: Denker H-W, Aplin JD (eds) Trophoblast invasion and endometrial receptivity. Plenum, New York, pp 431–451 (Trophoblast research, vol 4)
Enders AC (1965) A comparative study of the fine structure of the trophoblast in several haemochorial placentas. Am J Anat 116: 29–68
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burton, G.J. (1992). Human and Animal Models: Limitations and Comparisons. In: Barnea, E.R., Hustin, J., Jauniaux, E. (eds) The First Twelve Weeks of Gestation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84385-3_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84385-3_27
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-84387-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-84385-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive