Turbomachinery Blade Loading Prediction Using the Panel Method

  • Shih H. Chen
Conference paper


A 2D frequency domain source-doublet based potential paneling formulation is used to predict the steady and unsteady loadings on turbomachinery blades. The method employed blade-to-blade periodic boundary condition and interblade phase angles to simulate the complex blade-viscous wake interaction in a relative motion. For centrifugal turbomachines, a quasi-3D flow is calculated along the stream surfaces, using appropriate coordinate transformation and stream tube thickness variations. Results obtained from this method agreed well with measured data and other predicting methods. This method is accurate and computational efficient compared to finite difference methods. In this paper, the method of frequency domain computation is discussed. Selected results from 2D and quasi 3D flow in steady, and unsteady states are presented.


Unsteady Pressure Turbomachinery Blade Space Shuttle Main Engine Frequency Domain Computation Subsonic Mach Number 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Hess, J. L., “Higher Order Numerical Solution of the Integral Equation for the Two-Dimensional Neumann Problem,” Comp. Methods in Appl. Mech. and Eng., Vol. 2, p.1–15, 1973.CrossRefMATHADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    McFarland, E. R., “A Rapid Blade-to-Blade Solution for use in Turbomachinery Design,” J. of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, Vol. 106, p.376–382, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Fujinami, T., “Computation of Unsteady Separated Compressible Flows Using Free-Vortex Method,” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, U. of Texas, Austin, 1985.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Rai, M. M., “Navier-Stokes Simulations of Rotor-Stator Interaction Using Patched and Overlaid Grids,” AIAA paper no. 85-1519.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Liu, J. and Sockol, P., “Unsteady Euler Cascade Analysis,” AIAA paper no. 89-0322.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Chen, S. H., “Unsteady load prediction in a Turbomachinery Cascade Due to Nonuni-form Upstream Flow Field,” AIAA paper no. 89-0450.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Morino, L., “A General Theory of Unsteady Compressible Potential Aerodynamics,” NASA CR-2464, 1974.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Gostelow, J. P., “Potential Flow through Cascades — A Comparison between exact and Approximate Solutions,” ARC CP-807, 1965.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Eckardt, D., “Detailed Flow Investigations with a High-Speed Centrifugal Compressor Impeller,” J. of Fluids Engineering, p.390-399, 1976.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Prince, T. C., and Bryans, A. C., “Three-Dimensional Inviscid Computation of an Impeller Flow,” J. of Engineering for Gas Turbine and Power, Vol. 106, p.523–528, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shih H. Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.Rocketdyne DivisionRockwell International CorporationCanoga ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations