Advertisement

Physics Models for Reliability Data Processing

  • R. Righini
  • G. Zappellini
Conference paper

Summary

Normally, in examining and processing failure reliability data, people apply the flat part of the “bathtube” curve; experience has verified that for many simple electric and electronic components such a distribution occurs: they are characterized by a long period with few and random failures. But experience has also verified that many types of components have not a constant hazard rate; f. e., normally mechanical components have a wearout characteristic and a continuously increasing hazard rate during all the life. Besides, if only two or three items are tested for a short time, little in the way of accurate quantitative conclusions can be drawn applying the classical statistics laws and assuming a bathtube distribution; bayesian methods may be taken into consideration, but these methods may be applied only when significative data on a set of similar items (components) is available; on the contrary we must remark that the preferred method to compute the reliability of an item is to consider the basic physics of the failure: it is, to predict the component failure rate in terms of a statistical variation of the physics parameters characterizing its operating conditions. On this subject. we must say that if one agrees to characterize a component by a hazard rate function and to evaluate the hazard parameters by testing. the result is a macroscopic model. Such a model is not concerned with what happens inside the black box containing the part but only with the statistics of the part performance. To delve inside the black box. one must postulate various hypotheses about the microscopic behaviour of the device and to prove validity; in this type of reliability model. the causes of the component failure are considered. We have called “physics models” this type of methods to process reliability data; they mainly consist of the following three basic steps:
  1. 1-

    Analysis of the physics laws characterizing the component(part) normal operation.

     
  2. 2-

    Singling out of the parameters of the above laws affected by stocastic variations in order to choose and to define the failure distributions to be applied.

     
  3. 3-

    Evaluation, on the basis of the material data and of the component characteristics. of the limit variation range of the parameters mentioned in point 2 in order to exactly evaluate the foreseen failure rate distribution of the component.

     

ENEA has carried out a data collection on typical components of the French fast reactors Rapsodie and Phenix; these data have been registered on an informatics system. In consideration of the experimental type of these components. of the small number of followed items and of occurred failures. the classical and bayesian methods do not allow the evaluation of too significative reliability data. At this aim ENEA-VEL has set·up some physics models on the ground of the physics laws governing the component operation and of the failure causes. A brief description of these methods, the results obtained by their application on some components and a comparison of these results with the ones obtained applying the classical and bayesian methods will be the subject of the present paper.

Keywords

Failure Probability Bayesian Method Centrifugal Pump Component Failure Hazard Rate Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    ENEA -RT /VEL/87/3-R. Righini, G. Sola - “How-to-use the ENEA data bank for the classification and reliability processing of fast reactor component event data. Data entry and inquiry procedures.”Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ENEA; FT.WLC.OOOO5 - R. Righini, G. Sola, L. Briati - “How-to-use the ENEA data bank for the classification and reliability processing of fast reactor component event data. Structure and codes.”Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pubblicazione ENEA – “The ENEA-CEA data bank: processing of reliability data on FBR components - Proceedings of the Seminar organized by ENEA in collaboration with CEA and NIER on: ENEA-CEA data bank, Methods for system analysis, Updating of processed reliability data on Rapsodie and Phenix components” - Bologna, March 22–23 1988. - Pubblicazione ENEA - Atti del Seminario su “Raccolta ed elaborazione dati di affidabilità di componenti di reattori veloci su un sistema informativo” - Bologna, 17–10–1984Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.R.C. - EURATOM Ispra “Component Event Data Bank: handbook” T.N. 1.05 C1.84.66Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ENEA-FT.WLC.00006 - R. Righini, V. Guerrini, G. Zappellini - “Updating Journal of the processed reliability data on Phenix and Rapsodie reactor components.”Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ENEA-RTNEL/85/8 - G. Cambi, R. Righini, P. G. Sola - “II programma ABC: un codice di calcolo per la stima di parametri statistici secondo l’analisi bayesiana e classica.”Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ENEA - RT report to be issued - R. Righini, G. Zappellini - “New methods to process reliabi1ity data.”Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    PRA - Procedures Guides” - NUREG/CR - 2300 (1982).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Commission of the European Communities - Nuclear Science and Technology - A. G. Colombo, R. J.Jaarsma - “BAESNUM. A conversational computer program for the bayesian extimation of a parameter by a numerical method.” - EUR 7900 EN.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ASME BOILER AND PRESSURE VESSEL CODE - SECTION III - “Rules for the construction of Nuclear Power Plant Components.” - ANSSI/ASME-BPV -III-I-NB.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. G. Ligeron – “La fiabilitè en Mecanique” - Desforges Publisher - Paris.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. F. Coffin - “A study of the effects of cyclic thermal stresses on a ductile metal” - Trans. ASME 76, 923.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. S. Nelson - “Thermal stress in design. Part cyclic life of ductile materials” - Mechanical Design 32 (14) - 7.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S.S. Nelson - “Fatigue: a complex subject, some simple approximations” - Exp. Mach. 5 (7) July 75.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    F. Bastenaire - “Etude de la rupture par fatigue par les methodes statistques. Bulletin de l’Institut International de Statistique” 1961.Google Scholar
  16. -F. Bastenaire - “Aspects probabiliste et statisique sur la rupture par fatigue.” - Revue française de la Mecanique Nº37, 1971Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    -“Mechanical Engineerig Design” Mc Graw Hill Book Co. - N. Y., 72 J.E. Shigley.Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    “Interaction among the various phenomena included in the design of dynamic one rotary machinery” Ad 671780, April 68.Google Scholar
  19. 18.
    -ISO Rule Number 1000.Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    RIV - SKF Catalogo 3200 I - 1982Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    a) “Centro Ricerche FIAT” International Report N. C-304 b) “Corrosion Data Survey” - Metal Section 5a Edizione G. A. Nelson, NACE, Houston, Texas.Google Scholar
  22. 21.
    a) ENI “Enciclopedia del Petrolio” - Milano 1978 b) “Corrosion Guide” Elsevier, London 1978Google Scholar
  23. 22.
    A. D. Swain, H. E. Guttmann - “Handbook of human reliability with emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant application” - NUREG/CR - 1278 (August 1983)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Righini
    • 1
  • G. Zappellini
    • 2
  1. 1.VEL DepartmentENEA (Comitato Nazionale per la Ricerca e per lo Sviluppo dell’Energia Nucleare e delle Energie Alternative)BolognaItaly
  2. 2.NIER (Nuovi Interventi Energetici)BolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations