Skip to main content

Short-Term Immunosuppression and Dog Cortical Allografts

  • Conference paper
Bone Transplantation
  • 105 Accesses

Abstract

Cortical segmental autografts and allografts have been used in the surgical reconstruction of large musculoskeletal defects. The use of allografts is an attractive alternative to autografts and metal implants because of their ready availability, their capacity to have soft tissues become attached to them, and their relative clinical usefulness in combination with implant devices. However, approximately 15%–25% of large allografts seem to be compromised by an apparent immunogenic disparity between donor tissues and the recipient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bradely JV (1968) Fisher’s method of randomization. In: Distribution-free statistical tests. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prenticehall, pp 68–86

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bright RW, Burchardt H (1983) The biomechanical properties of preserved bone grafts. In: Friedlander GE, Mankin HJ, Sell KW (eds) Osteochondral allografts: biology, banking, clinical applications. Little, Brown, Boston, pp 233–247

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burchardt H, Glowczewskie FP, Enneking WF (1977) Allogeneic segmental fibular transplants in azathioprine immunosuppressed dogs. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 59A: 881

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burchardt H, Jones H, Glowczewskie FP, Rudner C, Enneking WF (1978) Freeze-dried allogeneic segmental cortical bone grafts in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 60A: 1082

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Burchardt H, Glowczewskie FP, Enneking WF (1981) Short-term immunosuppression with fresh segmental fibular allografts in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 63A: 411

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Burchardt H (1983) The biology of bone graft repair. Clin Orthop 174: 28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dausset J et al. (1971) Histocompatibility studies in closely bred colony of dogs: III. Genetic definition of the DL-A system of canine histocompatibility with particular reference to the comparative immunology of the major transplantable organs. J Exp Med 134: 1222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dixon WF (1973) BMD programm II V: Multivariate general linear hypothesis. In: Dixon WF (ed) BMD: biomedical computer programs. University of California Press, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  9. Elves MW, Pratt LM (1975) The pattern of new bone formation in isografts of bone. Acta Orthop Scand 46: 549

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Enneking WF, Burchardt H, Puhl JJ, Piotrowski G (1975) Physical and biological aspects of repair in dog cortical-bone transplants. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 57A: 237

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedlaender GE, Strong DM, Sell KW (1976) Studies on the antigenicity of bone: I. Freeze-dried and deep-frozen bone allografts in rabbits. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 58A: 854

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jowsey J, Kelly PJ, Riggo BL, Bianco AJ Jr, Scholz DA, Gershon-Cohen J (1965) Quantitative microradiographic studies of normal and osteoporotic bone. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 47A: 785

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Morrison DF (1967) Multivariate statistical methods. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 159–206

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pelker RR, Friedlaender GE, Markham TC, Panjabi MM, Moen CJ (1984) Effects of freezing and freeze-drying on the biomechanical properties of rat bone. J Orthop Res 1: 405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Scherr DD, Dodd TA (1973) The effect of brief exposure of pathogenic bacteria to neomycin sulfate, bacitracin, and polymyx b sulfate. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 55A: 660

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vriesendorp HM et al. (1973) Joint report of first international workshop on canine immunogenetics. Tissue Antigens 3: 145

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Weiland AJ, Phillips TW, Randolph BS (1984) Bone grafts: a radiologic histologic and biomechanical model comparing autografts, allografts, and free vascularized bone grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 74 (3): 368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Burchardt, H. (1989). Short-Term Immunosuppression and Dog Cortical Allografts. In: Aebi, M., Regazzoni, P. (eds) Bone Transplantation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83571-1_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83571-1_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-83573-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-83571-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics