Pulse Shaping and Extraction of Information from Ultrasonic Reflections in Composite Materials

  • Doron Kishoni
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 44)


Most ultrasonic inspections of materials involve sending elastic waves generated by a transducer through the investigated material, and monitoring either the transmitted waves as appear on the other side of the material, or the reflected waves which return back to the first side. Information about the state of the material is obtained by analyzing the received waves for global acoustic properties as well as local properties that may result from acoustic discontinuities such as defects in the material. Such analysis becomes more difficult when investigating composite materials. These materials have a complex structure, a complex acoustic wave propagation, and are limited to inspection by waves with relatively low frequencies due to high attenuation at high frequencies. All these contribute to more complex waveforms where overlapping of different signals make identification and investigation of discrete events very difficult. Digital signal processing can be used to help in this matter, increase the resolution, and facilitate analysis, as demonstrated here through description of three cases.


Pulse Shaping Digital Signal Processing Front Surface Back Surface Acoustic Velocity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    D. Kishoni: Application of Digital Pulse Shaping by Least Squares Method to Ultrasonic Signals in Composites. In: Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE (June 23–28, 1985), (D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, ed.), Vol. 5A, pp. 781–787, New York: Plenum Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Kishoni, W. P. Winfree, and F. R. Parker: Design of FIR Filter for Velocity Measurement in Curing Epoxy Resins. IEEE 1986 Ultrasonics Symposium, Nov. 17–19, 1986. Williamsburg, VA.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. V. Oppenheim and R. W. Schafer: Digital Signal Processing. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1975.MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. A. Robinson and S. Treitel: Geophysical Signal Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1980.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. A. Robinson and M. T. Silvia: Digital Foundations of Time Series Analysis. CA: Holden-Day, 1981.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. M. Gammel: Improved Ultrasonic Detection Using The Analytic Signal Magnitude. Ultrasonics, March 1981, 19(), pp 73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. M. Gammel: Analogue Implementation of Analytic Signal Processing for Pulse-Echo Systems. Ultrasonics, Nov. 1981, 19 (6), pp 279–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. H. Johnston and D. Kishoni: Practical Application of State-of-the-Art NDE Techniques: Evaluation of Graphite-Epoxy Composite Wing Covers. In: Review of Progress in Quantitative NDE (June 21–26, 1987), (D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, ed.), ( to appear ), New York: Plenum Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Doron Kishoni
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsThe College of William and MaryWilliamsburgUSA

Personalised recommendations