Abstract
The log-rank test (Peto and Peto 1972) is now widely used for comparing survival data from randomised clinical trials of cancer treatment that require prolonged follow-up. The test is optimal when the death rate in one group consistently exceeds that in the other group by a given proportion, the so-called proportional hazards situation. Alternative tests that are sometimes used are Gehan’s generalisation of the Wilcoxon rank sum test (Gehan 1965) and its subsequent modifications by Peto and Peto (1972) and by Prentice (1978). Of these, the latter is to be preferred with censored data (Prentice and Marek 1979), and, as shown by Lee et al. (1975) in a simulation experiment comparing survival curves modelled on Wei- bull distributions, it may perform better in a nonproportional hazards situation. Similarly, Fleming et al. (1980) have demonstrated the loss of power of the log- rank compared with that of the Wilcoxon test in comparing survival curves where the greatest differences occur at early follow-up times, and Harrington and Fleming (1982) have shown a similar loss when the hazard ratio is a maximum at time zero and decreases smoothly towards unity as follow-up increases. The reason for the difference between the performance of the two tests is that the calculation of the Wilcoxon statistic weights the differences between observed and expected events according to the estimated survival at the time of the event, whereas the log-rank calculation gives equal weights at all event times (Tarone and Ware 1977). Thus, the Wilcoxon test gives more weight to differences which appear early in follow-up.
This article is reprinted with permission from Pergamon Journals Ltd., from Haybittle JL (1986) Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 22: 1279-1283.
I am indebted to Mr. Laurence Freedman for his helpful discussions during the course of this work, and to Professor N. M. Bleehen for allowing me to use the facilities of the MRC Cancer Trials Office, Cambridge.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Canellos GP, Hellman S, Veronesi U (1982) The management of early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 306: 1430–1432
Fleming TR, O’Fallon JR, O’Brien PC, Harrington DP (1980) Modified Kolmogorov-Smir-nov test procedures with application to arbitrarily right-censored data. Biometrics 36: 607–625
Gehan EA (1965) A generalized Wilcoxon test for comparing arbitrarily singly censored samples. Biometrika 52: 203–217
Harrington DP, Fleming TR (1982) A class of rank test procedures for censored survival data. Biometrika 69: 553–566
Lacour J, Lacour F, Spira A, Michelson M, Petit J-Y, Delage G, Sarrazin D, Contesso G, Vi-guier J (1980) Adjuvant treatment with polyadenylic-polyuridylic acid (PolyA.PolyU) in operable breast cancer. Lancet ii: 161–164
Lacour J, Lacour F, Spira A, Michelson M, Petit J-Y, Delage G, Sarrazin D, Contesso G, Vi-guier J (1984) Adjuvant treatment with polyadenylic-polyuridylic acid in operable breast cancer: updated results of a randomized trial. Br Med J 288: 589–592
Lee ET, Desu MM, Gehan EA (1975) A Monte Carlo study of the power of some two-sample tests. Biometrika 62: 425–432
Nissen-Meyer R (1979) Adjuvant cytostatic and endocrine therapy: increased cure rate or delayed manifest disease. Comm Res Breast Dis 1: 95–109
Peto R, Peto J (1972) Asymptotically efficient rank invariant test procedures. J R Stat Soc A 135: 185–198
Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P, Breslow NE, Cox DR, Howard SV, Mantel N, McPherson K, Peto J, Smith PG (1977) Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. Analysis and examples. Br J Cancer 35:1–39
Prentice RL (1978) Linear rank tests with right-censored data. Biometrika 65: 167–179
Prentice RL, Marek P (1979) A qualitative discrepancy between censored-data rank tests. Biometrics 35: 861–867
Tarone RE, Ware J (1977) On distribution-free tests for equality of survival distributions. Biometrika 64: 156–160
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Haybittle, J.L. (1988). Significance Testing in the Comparison of Survival Curves from Clinical Trials of Cancer Treatment. In: Scheurlen, H., Kay, R., Baum, M. (eds) Cancer Clinical Trials. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 111. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83419-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83419-6_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-83421-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-83419-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive