Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Proprioceptive Feedback for Sensory-Motor Control

  • Conference paper
Sensors and Sensory Systems for Advanced Robots

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NATO ASI F,volume 43))

  • 251 Accesses

Abstract

Among the natural sensors, which provide proprioceptive feedback during movement, the muscle spindle has attracted most interest since the sensitivity of spindle afferents to length variations of the host muscle is subjected to efferent control by fusimotor neurones (mostly γ-motoneurones). These are themselves controlled from numerous centres of the nervous system. Functionally, the perhaps most important feature of γ-action is that the fusimotor system, with its static (γS, sensitivity reducing) and dynamic (γD, sensitivity enhancing) components, possesses the potential of providing flexible gain (or sensitivity) control of spindle feedback. One of the most relevant pending issues in the field of peripheral control of movement is whether, and under which circumstances, this potential is used during physiological motor performance.

This paper gives a brief overview of important functional properties of the sensory spindle afferents and of efferent fusimotor action and it addresses the question of fusimotor function during natural movement. It is pointed out, that strategies of fusimotor action, which have been encountered in reduced laboratory preparations, appear not be be adhered to during normal motor performance. An alternative concept of fusimotor function, the notion of fusimotor set, is presented. According to this, key features of fusmotor action are

  • largely tonic γS and γD firing patterns (even during rhythmic movements, featuring rhythmic skeletomotor α-activity), suggesting independent central control of the skeletomotor and fusimotor systems,

  • a dramatic switch from predominant and low-key static action (during routine motor performance) to predominant and powerful dynamic action (during unfamiliar motor tasks),

  • gradual resetting of fusimotor drive of a given type during periods of motor adjustment.

Thus, proprioceptive feedback from spindle afferents is not invariant. It appears to be adapted to specific requirements of motor tasks, conceivably to optimize motor control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Appelberg B (1981) Selective central control of dynamic gamma motoneurones utilised for the functional classification of gamma cells. Ins Taylor A, Prochazka A (eds) Muscle receptors and movement. Macmillan, London, pp 97–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Appenteng K Prochazka A (1984) Tendon organ firing during active muscle lengthening in awake, normally behaving cats. J Physiol(Lond) 353:81–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Appenteng K, Morimoto T, Taylor A (1980) Fusimotor activity in masseter nerve of the cat during reflex jaw movements. J Physiol(Lond) 305:415–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess PR, Clark FJ (1969) Characteristics of knee joint receptors in the cat. J Physiol(Lond) 203:317–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke D (1981) The activity of human muscle spindle endings in normal motor behavior. Int Rev Physiol 20:91–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabelguen JM (1981) Static and dynamic fusimotor controls in various hindlimb muscles during locomotor activity in the decorticate cat. Brain Res 213:83–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carli G, Fontani G, Meucci M (1981) Static characteristics of muscle afferents from gluteus medius muscle: comparison with joint afferents of hip in cats. J Neurophysiol 45: 1085–1095

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark FJ, Burgess PR (1975) Slowly adapting receptors in cat knee joint: can they signal joint angle? J Neurophysiol 36: 1448–1463

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchlow V, von Euler C (1963) Intercostal muscle spindle activity and its gamma motor control. J Physiol(Lond) 168: 820–847

    Google Scholar 

  • Eklund G, von Euler C, Rutkowski S (1964) Spontaneous and reflex activity of intercostal gamma motoneurones. J Physiol (Lond) 171:139–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Evarts EV, Shinoda Y, Wise SP (1984) Neurophysiological approaches to higher brain functions. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin GM, Luschei E (1975) Discharge of spindle afferents from jaw closing muscles during chewing in alert monkeys. J Neurophysiol 38: 560–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin GM, Hulliger M, Matthews PBC (1975) The effects of fusimotor stimulation during small amplitude stretching on the frequency response of the primary ending of the mammalian muscle spindle. J Physiol(Lond) 253:175–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Goslow GE, Reinking RM, Stuart DG (1973) The cat step cycle: hind limb joint angles and muscle lengths during unrestrained locomotion. J Morphol 141:1–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb S, Taylor A (1983) Interpretation of fusimotor activity in cat masseter nerve during reflex jaw movements. J Physiol(Lond) 345:423–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Granit R (1955) Receptors and sensory perception. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagbarth K-E (1981) Fusimotor and stretch reflex functions studied in recordings from muscle spindle afferents in man. In: Taylor A, Prochazka A (eds) Muscle receptors and movement. Macmillan, London, pp 277–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan Z (1983) A model of spindle afferent response to muscle stretch. J Neurophysiol 49:989–1006

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulliger M (1984) The mammalian muscle spindle and its central control. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 101:1–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulliger M (1986) The role of muscle spindle receptors and fusimotor neurones in the control of movement. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulliger M,(1986) An iterative and interactive simulation method for reconstruction of unknown inputs contributing to known outputs of neuronal systems (this volume)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulliger M, Prochazka A (1983) A new simulation method to deduce fusimotor activity from afferent discharge recorded in freely moving cats. J Neurosci Methods 8:197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulliger M, Sonnenberg R (1985) Does the paradoxical γD-mediated reduction of la sensitivity to small stretches persist during larger background movements? Neurosci Letters Suppl 22:S595

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulliger M, Matthews PBC, Noth J, (1977a) Static and dynamic fusimotor action on the response of la fibres to low frequency sinusoidal stretching of widely ranging amplitude. J Physiol(Lond) 267:811–838

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulliger M, Matthews PBC, Noth J (1977b) Effects of combining static and dynamic fusimotor stimulation on the response of the muscle spindle primary ending to sinusoidal stretching. J Physiol(Lond) 267:839–856

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulliger M, Zangger P, Prochazka A, Appenteng K (1985) Fusimotor “Set” vs. α-γ linkage in voluntary movement in cats. In: Struppler A, Weindl A (eds) Electromyography and evoked potentials. Adv Appl Neurol Sci Is 56–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulliger M, Prochazka A, Zangger P (1986) Fusimotor activity in freely moving cats. Tests of concepts derived from reduced preparations. In: Grillner S, Stein PSG, Forssberg H, Herman RM, Stuart DG, Wallén P (eds) Neurobiology of vertebrate locomotion. Macmillan, London (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen JKS, Walloe L (1970) Signal transmission between successive neurons in the dorsal spinocerebellar pathway. In: Schmitt FO (ed) The neurosciences, second study program. Rockefeller University Press, New York, pp 617–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Laporte Y, Emonet-Dénand F, Jami L (1981) The skeletofusimotor or β-innervation of mammalian muscle spindles. TINS 4:97–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson CR, Smith A, Luschei ES (1981) Discharge characteristics and stretch sensitivity of jaw muscle afferents in the monkey during controlled isometric bites. J Neurophysiol 46:130–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb GE (1984) The control and responses of mammalian muscle spindles during normally executed motor tasks. Exercise Sports Sci Rev 12:157–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb GE, Hoffer JA (1985) Activity of spindle afferents from cat anterior thigh muscles. II. Effects of fusimotor blockade. J Neurophysiol 54:565–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb GE, Hoffer JA, Pratt CA (1985) Activity of spindle afferents from cat anterior thigh muscles. I. Identification and patterns during normal locomotion. J Neurophysiol 54:549–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews PBC (1962) The differentiation of two types of fusimotor fibre by their effects on the dynamic response of muscle spindle primary endings. Q J Exp Physiol 47:324–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews PBC (1972) Mammalian muscle receptors and their central action. Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews PBC (1981a) Evolving views on the internal operation and functional role of the muscle spindle. J Physiol(Lond) 320:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews PBC (1981b) Muscle spindles: their messages and their fusimotor supply. In: Brookhart JM, Mountcastle VB, Brooks VB, (eds) Motor control, part 1. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, pp 189-228 (Handbook of physiology, sect 1, vol 2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews PBC, Stein RB (1969a) The sensitivity of muscle spindle afferents to small sinusoidal changes of length. J Physiol (Lond) 200:723–743

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews PBC, Stein RB (1969b) The regularity of primary and secondary muscle spindle afferent discharges. J Physiol (Lond) 202:59–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy PR, Stein RB, Taylor J (1984) Phasic and tonic modulation of impulse rates in γ-motoneurons during locomotion in premammillary cats. J. Neurophysiol 52:228–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Perret C, Berthoz A (1973) Evidence of static and dynamic fusimotor actions on the spindle response to sinusoidal stretch during locomotor activities in the cat. Exp Brain Res 18: 178–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prochazka A (1984) Chronic techniques for studying neurophysiology of movement in cats. In: Lemon R, (ed) Methods of neuronal recording in conscious animals. IBRO handbook series: methods in the neurosciences 4. Wiley, Chichester, pp 113–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Prochazka A, Hulliger M (1983) Muscle afferent function and its significance for motor control mechanisms during voluntary movements in cat, monkey, and man. In: Desmedt JE, (ed) Motor control mechanisms in health and disease. Adv Neurol 39:93-132

    Google Scholar 

  • Prochazka A, Hulliger M, Zangger P, Appenteng K (1985) “Fusimotor set”: new evidence for α-independent control of γ- motoneurones during movement in the awake cat. Brain Res 339:136–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proske U (1981) The Golgi tendon organ. Properties of the receptor and reflex action of impulses arising from tendon organs. Int Rev Physiol 25:127–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi A, Grigg P (1982) Characteristics of hip joint mechanoreceptors in the cat. J Neurophysiol 47:1029–1042

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaible H-G, Schmidt RF (1983) Responses of fine medial articular nerve afferents to passive movement of knee joint. J Neurophysiol 49:1118–1126

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaible H-G, Schmidt RF (1985) Effects of an experimental arthritis on the sensory properties of fine articular afferent units. J Neurophysiol 54:1109–1122

    Google Scholar 

  • Schieber MH, Thach WT (1985) Trained slow tracking. II. Bidirectional discharge patterns of cerebellar nuclear, motor cortex, and spindle afferent neurons. J Neurophysiol 54: 1228–1270

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz M, Sontag K-H, Wand P (1984) Non-dopaminergic neurons of the reticular part of substantia nigra can gate static fusimotor action onto flexors in cat. J Physiol(Lond) 354: 333–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears TA (1964) Efferent discharges in alpha and fusimotor fibres of intercostal nerves of the cat. J Physiol(Lond) 174:295–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Severin FV (1970) The role of the gamma motor system in the activation of the extensor alpha motor neurones during controlled locomotion. Biophysics 15:1138–1145

    Google Scholar 

  • Severin FV, Orlovskii GN, Shik ML (1967) Work of the muscle receptors during controlled locomotion. Biophysics 12:575–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöström A, Zangger P (1976) Muscle spindle control during locomotor movements generated by the deafferented spinal cord. Acta Physiol Scand 97:281–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein RB (1974) Peripheral control of movement. Physiol Rev 54:215–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor A, Appenteng K (1981) Distinctive modes of static and dynamic fusimotor drive in jaw muscles. In: Taylor A, Prochazka A, (eds) Muscle receptors and movement. Macmillan, London, pp 179–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor J, Stein RB, Murphy PR (1985) Impulse rates and sensitivity to stretch of soleus muscle spindle afferent fibers during locomotion in premammillary cats. J Neurophysiol 53: 341–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallbo ÅB, Hulliger M (1981) Independence of skeletomotor and fusimotor activity in man? Brain Res 223:176–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallbo ÅB, Hagbarth K-E, Torebjork HE, Wallin G (1979) Somatosensory, proprioceptive and sympathetic activity in human peripheral nerves. Physiol Rev 59:919–957

    Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley B, Hodgson JA, Burke RE (1978) Forces produced by medial gastrocnemius and soleus muscles during locomotion in freely moving cats. J Neurophysiol 41:1203–1216

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Brain Research Institute, University of Zürich, August-Forel-Strasse 1, CH-8029, Zürich, Switzerland

    Manuel Hulliger

Authors
  1. Manuel Hulliger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Scuola Superiore di Studi Universitari e di Perfezionamento S. Anna, Via Carducci 40, I-56100, Pisa, Italy

    Paolo Dario

  2. Centro “E. Piaggio”, University of Pisa, Via Diotisalvi, 2, I-56100, Pisa, Italy

    Paolo Dario

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hulliger, M. (1988). Proprioceptive Feedback for Sensory-Motor Control. In: Dario, P. (eds) Sensors and Sensory Systems for Advanced Robots. NATO ASI Series, vol 43. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83410-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83410-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-83412-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-83410-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation