Skip to main content

Changing Aspects of Biopsy of the Breast: Is Breast Biopsy a Prognostic Hazard?

  • Chapter
Breast Cancer

Part of the book series: Recent Results in Cancer Research ((RECENTCANCER,volume 105))

  • 83 Accesses

Abstract

The attitude concerning breast biopsy in patients with malignant or suspected malignant mammary lesions has varied since biopsy was first carried out in the middle of the nineteenth century (McGraw and Hartman 1933). Initially, the main disagreement was about the overall necessity for breast biopsy. Later, the issues were when and how to do the biopsy. Today, most surgeons probably agree that ablative mammary procedures should not be undertaken unless malignancy has been verified by microscopic examinations of the suspected lesions. This almost universal agreement concerning the necessity for microscopic examination may in part be due to the recognition of the inaccuracy of the clinical examination in early malignancies of the breast. With the introduction of subclinical cancer, the microscopic examination has become indispensable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abramson DJ (1976) Delayed mastectomy after outpatient breast biopsy. Long-term survival study. Am J Surg 132: 596–598

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adair FE (1933) Clinical manifestations of early cancer of the breast. N Engl J Med 208:1250–1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen J A, Blichert-Toft M, Kjaergard J et al. (1984) Prognostic significance of residual cancer tissue after diagnostic biopsy in breast carcinoma. Three year short-term results. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 20: 765–770

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bertario L, Reduzzi D, Piromalli D et al. (1985) Outpatient biopsy of breast cancer. Ann Surg 201: 64–67

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon JM, Anderson TJ, Lamb J et al. (1984) Fine needle aspiration cytology, in relationships to clinical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of a solid breast mass. Br J Surg 71: 593–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher ER (1984) The impact of pathology on the biologic, diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic considerations in breast cancer. Surg Clin North Am 64:1073–1093

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haagensen CD, Stout AP (1951) Carcinoma of the breast. Ann Surg 134:151–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haagensen CD (1971) Diseases of the breast, 2nd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 143–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington SW (1933) Carcinoma of the breast: surgical treatment and results five, ten and fifteen years after radical amputation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 56:438–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington SW (1935) Unilateral cancer of the breast treated by surgical operation and radiation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 60:499–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattori T, Niimoto M, Nakano A et al. (1980) Biopsy of the breast. Jpn J Surg 10: 270–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hermansen C, Poulsen HS, Jensen J et al. (1984) Palpable breast tumors: “triple diagnosis” and operative strategy. Acta Chir Scand 150: 625–628

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGraw AB, Hartman FW (1933) Present status of the biopsy. JAMA 101:1205–1209

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore CH (1867) On the influence of inadequate operations on the theory of breast cancer. R Chir Soc 1:244–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen HO, Blichert-Toft M, Hariri J (1983) The pistomat needle biopsy for preoperative diagnosis of breast tumors. Ugeskr Laeger 145: 234–236

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen TS, Egedorf J, Ibsen J et al. (1978) Employment of fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis and therapy of tumors of the breast. Ugeskr Laeger 140: 2973–2975

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce EH, Clagett OT, McDonald JR et al. (1956) Biopsy of the breast followed by delayed radical mastectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 103: 559–564

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shabot MM, Goldberg IM, Schick P et al. (1982) Aspiration cytology is superior to Tru-cut needle biopsy in establishing the diagnosis of clinically suspicious breast masses. Ann Surg 196:122–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shallow TA, Wagner FB, Colcher RE (1953) Adequate breast biopsy. Arch Surg 67: 526–536

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Storrs HG (1952) The role of excision biopsy in lesions of the breast. Am Surg 18:1199–1206

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tyzzer EE (1913) Factors in the production and growth of tumor metastasis. J Med Res 28: 309–333

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Urban JA (1978) Management of operable breast cancer: the surgeons view. Cancer 42:2066–2077

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Watt-Boolsen, S., Blichert-Toft, M., Andersen, J.A., Andersen, K.W. (1987). Changing Aspects of Biopsy of the Breast: Is Breast Biopsy a Prognostic Hazard?. In: Brünner, S., Langfeldt, B. (eds) Breast Cancer. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 105. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82964-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82964-2_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-82966-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-82964-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics