Abstract
The most common model of human behavior employed in game theory is the normal form, introduced by von NEUMANN and MORGENSTERN (1953). An example of a two player, two strategy game (“2×2 game”) in normal form is illustrated in Table 1. This particular game is called “Prisoners’ Dilemma”. The possible outcomes are the four cells of the matrix. Player 1 must choose between row R1 and row R2, while player 2 must choose between column C1 and column C2. If Player 1 chooses R1 while 2 chooses CI, the resulting outcome is the upper left cell of the matrix, which, in Prisoners’ Dilemma, is marked 3,3. The numbers in each cell (called “payoffs”) denote the relative preference of each player for the outcome; the first number is for Player 1 and the second for Player 2. The higher the number, the more preferred the outcome. Thus, the most preferred outcome for Player 1 is represented by the (R2, C1) cell, which is marked 4,1. This is Player 2’s least preferred outcome.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Axelrod, R. (1984): The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books
Benjamin, C.M. (1981): Developing a Game/Decision Theoretic Approach to Comparative Foreign Policy Analysis: Some Cases in Recent American Foreign Policy. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Southern California
Bennett, P.G. and Dando, M.R. (1977): Fall Gelb and other games: A hyper-game perspective of the fall of France, 1940. Journal of the Conflict Research Society, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 1–32
Bennett, P.G. and Dando, M.R. (1979): Complex strategic analysis: a hyper-game perspective of the fall of France. Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 23–32
Bennett, P.G., Dando, M.R. and Sharp, R.G. (1980): Using hypergames to model difficult social issues: an approach to the case of soccer hooliganism. Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 31, pp. 621–635
Brams, S.J. (1977): Deception in 2x2 games. Journal of Peace Science, Vol. 2, pp. 171–203
Brams, S.J. (1985): Superpower Games: Applying Game Theory to Superpower Conflicts. New Haven CT: Yale University Press, 1985
Brams, S.J. and Davis, M.D. (1983): The verification problem in arms control: a game theoretic analysis, presentation to the Joint National Meeting of the Operations Research Society of America and the Institute of Management Sciences, Orlando, Florida, Nov. 7–9, 1983
Brams, S.J. and Wittman, D. (1981): Nonmyopic equilibria in 2x2 games, Conflict Management and Peace Science, 1981, Vol. 6, pp. 39–62
Fraser, N.M., Benjamin, C.M. and Powell, C.A. (1985): Optimizing the decision process: structure and stability in complex conflict. IS Notes, in press (accepted October, 1985)
Fraser, N.M., Benjamin, C.M. and Powell, C.A. (1985): Optimizing the decision process: structure and stability in complex conflict. Proceedings, Society for General Systems Research International Conference. Los Angeles, May 27–31, 1985, pp. 1061–1070
Fraser, N.M. and Hipel, K.W. (1979): Solving complex conflicts. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1979, Vol. SMC-9, pp. 181–185
Fraser, N.M. and Hipel, K.W. (1984): Conflict Analysis: Models and Resolutions. New York: North-Holland, 1984
Fraser, N.M. and Kilgour, D.M. (1985): Nonstrict ordinal 2x2 games: a comprehensive computer assisted analysis of the 726 possibilities. Theory and Decision, in press (accepted October, 1985)
Guyer, M. and Hamburger, H. (1968): A note on a ‘Taxonomy of 2x2 Games’, General Systems, 1968, Vol. 13, 205–208
Howard, N. (1971): Paradoxes of Rationality. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1971
Kilgour, D.M. (1984): Equilibria for far-sighted players, Theory and Decision. 1984, Vol. 16, pp. 135–157
Kilgour, D.M. and Fraser, N.M. (1985): A taxonomy of all ordinal 2x2 games, Department of Management Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 1985
Kilgour, D.M., Hipel, K.W. and Fraser, N.M. (1984): Solution concepts in 2x2 games, Large Scale Systems, 1984, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 49–72
Knight, K. and Powell, C.A. (1974): Metagame theory and the metagame/options analysis technique: A basic introduction and an application: Bandladesh, World Studies, 1974, Vol. 1, No. 1
Nash, J.F. (1951): Non-cooperative games, Annals of Mathematics, 1951, Vol. 54, pp. 286–295
Radford, K.J. and Fingerhut, B. (1980): Analysis of a complex decision situation - the Simpsons/Simpsons-Sears merger proposal. OMEGA, 1980, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 221–231
Rapoport, A. and Chammah, A.M. (1965): Prisoner’s Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1965
Rapoport, A. and Chammah, A.M. (1966): The game of Chicken. American Behavioral Scientist, 1966, Vol. 10, pp. 23–28
Rapoport, A., Guyer, M.J. and Gordon, D.G. (1976): The 2x2 Game. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1976.
Rapoport, A. and Guyer, M.J. (1966): A taxonomy of 2x2 games. General Systems, 1966, Vol. 11, pp. 203–214
Snyder, G.H. (1971): Prisoner’s Dilemma and Chicken models in international politics. International Studies Quarterly, 1971, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 97
Snyder, G.H. and Diesing, P. (1977): Conflict Among Nations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1977
Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1953): Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. 3rd Edition. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1953
Zagare, F.C. (1981): Non-myopic equilibria and the Middle East crisis of 1967. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 1981, Vol. 5, pp. 139–162
Zagare, F.C. (1984): Limited move equilibria in 2x2 games. Theory and Decision, 1984, Vol. 16, pp. 1–19
Zagare, F.C. (1985): The pathology of unilateral deterrence. Dynamic Models of International Conflict, M.D. Ward and U. Luterbacher, ed. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Reinner Press, 1985
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fraser, N.M. (1986). General Ordinal 2×2 Games in Arms Control Applications. In: Avenhaus, R., Huber, R.K., Kettelle, J.D. (eds) Modelling and Analysis in Arms Control. NATO ASI Series, vol 26. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82943-7_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82943-7_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-82945-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-82943-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive