Advertisement

Molecular Genetics of Pathogenicity of Xanthomonas Campestris

  • M. J. Daniels
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 1)

Abstract

Although genetical methods have been used to analyze microbial physiology with great success for several decades, complex phenomena such as pathogenicity present technical difficulties which have acted as a deterrent until recently, when the development of recombinant DNA procedures advanced to the point where novel approaches were feasible. An important milestone was the development of some broad host range gene cloning vectors [e.g. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,] which are either known or presumed to be suitable for use with members of the several genera of Gram-negative bacterial plant pathogens (Erwinia, Pseudomonas and Xanthomonas). The choice of vector for a particular organism is usually empirical. Factors such as the stability of Plasmids in vivo are of some importance, and variations may be apparent even between different isolates of the same bacterial species.

Keywords

Broad Host Range Pathogenicity Gene Xanthomonas Campestris Avirulence Gene Cosmid Vector 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ditta, G., Stanfield, S., Corbin, D. and Helinski, D.R., 1980, Broad host range DNA cloning system for Gram-negative bacteria: Construction of a gene bank of Rhizobium meliloti, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 77: 7347–7351.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Friedman, A.M., Long, S.R., Brown, S.E., Buikema, W.J. and Ausubel, F.M., 1982, Construction of a broad host range cosmid cloning vector and its use in the genetic analysis of Rhizobium mutants, Gene, 18: 289–296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Knauf, V.C. and Nester, E.W., 1982, Wide host range cloning vectors: a cosmid clone bank of an Agrobacterium Ti plasmid, Plasmid, 8: 45–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bagdasarian, M., Lurz, R., Rückert, B., Franklin, F.C.H., Bagdasarian M.M., Frey, J. and Timmis, K.N., 1981, Specific-purpose plasmid cloning vectors. II. Broad host range, high copy number RSF1010-derived vectors, and a host-vector system for gene cloning in Pseudomonas, Gene, 16: 237–247.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frey, J., Bagdasarian, M., Feiss, D., Franklin, F.C.H. and Deshusses, J., 1983, Stable cosmid vectors that enable the introduction of cloned fragments into a wide range of Gram-negative bacteria, Gene, 24: 299–308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sharpe, G.S., 1984, Broad-host-range cloning vectors for Gram-negative bacteria, Gene, 29: 93–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tait, R.C., Close, T.J., Lundquist, R.C., Hagiya, M., Rodriguez, R.I. and Kado, C.I., 1983, Construction and characterization of a versatile broad host range DNA cloning system for Gram-negative bacteria, Bio Technology, 1: 269–275.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Williams, P.H., 1980, Black rot: A continuing threat to world crucifers, Plant Disease, 64: 736–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Daniels, M.J., Barber, C.E., Turner, P.C., Cleary, W.G. and Sawczyc, M.K., 1984, Isolation of mutants of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris showing altered pathogenicity, J. Gen. Microbiol., 130: 2447–2455.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daniels, M.J. Barber C.E., Turner, P.C., Sawczyc, M.K., Byrde, R.J.W. and Fielding, A.H., 1984, Cloning of genes involved in pathogenicity of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris using the broad host range cosmid pLAFRI, EMBO J., 3: 3323–3328.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Turner, P., Barber, C. and Daniels, M., 1985, Evidence for clustered pathogenicity genes in Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris, Molec. Gen. Genet., 199: 338–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cook, A.A., Walker, J.C. and Larson, R.H., 1952, Studies on the disease cycle of black rot of crucifers, Phytopathology, 42: 162–167.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bain, D.C., 1952, Reaction of Brassica seedlings to blackrot, Phytopathology, 42: 497–500.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boucher, C., Barberis, P., Demery, D. and Trigalet, A., 1985, in: “Advances in Molecular Genetics of the Bacteria — Plant Interaction”, A.A. Szalay, and R.P. Legocki, eds., pp. 165–168, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anderson, D.M. and Mills, D., 1985, The use of transposon mutagenesis in the isolation of nutritional and virulence mutants in two pathovars of Pseudomonas syringae, Phytopathology, 75: 104–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ruvkun, G.B. and Ausubel, F.M., 1981, A general method for site-directed mutagenesis in prokaryotes, Nature, 289: 85–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Staskawicz, B.J., Dahlbeck, D. and Keen, N.T., 1984, Cloned avirulence gene of Pseudomonas syringae pv. glycinea determines race-specific incompatibility on Glycine max (L.) Merr., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 81: 6024–6028.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gabriel, D.W., 1985, in: “Advances in Molecular Genetics of the Bacteria — Plant Interaction”, A.A. Szalay and R.P. Logocki, eds., pp. 202–203, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brinkerhoff, L.A., 1970, Variation of Xanthomonas malvacearum and its relation to control, Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 8: 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. J. Daniels
    • 1
  1. 1.John Innes InstituteNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations