Skip to main content

The Use of Regression Techniques for Matching Reliability Models to the Real World

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NATO ASI F,volume 22))

Abstract

Similar models are often used in various disciplines. For example, models for time to an event or for times between successive events are needed in biometry and sociology applications, as well as in reliability. The specific circumstances of a particular discipline may suggest a particular family of distribution functions, e.g., the Weibull distribution, when modeling time to an event. Alternatively, a specific point process, e.g. the power law process (a nonhomogeneous Poisson process of specific functional form, see Ascher and Feingold (1984)) may be appropriate in a particular reliability application dealing with times between successive failures of a repairable system. In a biometry application, in which times between successive nonfatal illnesses of a patient are studied, another point process might be suggested. In practice, however, instead of considering that models are suggested by circumstances, there is far too much reliance on a priori specification of models. For example, in hardware reliability applications it is usually assumed that the exponential distribution is the appropriate model to use, regardless of the application. If this model is generalized at all, the “generalization” usually is restricted to using a Weibull distribution. In fact, one or the other of these distributions is usually invoked even when no distribution whatsoever is the appropriate model! That is, when dealing with a repairable system—and most systems are designed to be repaired rather than replaced after failure—the correct model is a sequence of distribution functions, i.e., a point process. Distribution functions and point processes are not equivalent models, even in the most special cases. A homogeneous Poisson process (HPP) can be defined as a nonterminating sequence of independent and identically exponentially distributed times between events. Ascher and Feingold (1979, 1984) show that there are important distinctions between the exponential distribution and HPP models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • O. Aalen (1978), “Nonparametric Inference for a Family of Counting Processes,” Annals of Statistics, 6, 701–726.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • P.D. Allison (1984), Event History Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Event Data, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Anderson, A.K. Jardine, and R.T. Higgins (1982), “The Use of Concomitant Variables in Reliability Estimation,” Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Pittsburgh Modeling and Simulation Conference, Instrument Society of America, pp. 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.E. Angus (1984), “The Application of Software Reliability Models to a Major C3I System,” Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, IEEE Cat. No. 84CH1992-7, pp. 268–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • H.E. Ascher (1983), “Regression Analysis of Repairable Systems Reliability,” in Electronic Systems Effectiveness and Life Cycle Costing, J.K. Skwirzynski, ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 119–133.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • H.E. Ascher and H. Feingold (1979), “The Aircraft Air Conditioner Data Revisited,” Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, IEEE Cat. No. 79CH1429-OR, pp. 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • H.E. Ascher and H. Feingold (1984), Repairable Systems Reliability: Modeling, Inference, Misconceptions and Their Causes, Marcel Dekker, New York and Basel.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • A. Bendell (1984), “Proportional Hazards Modelling in Reliability Assessment,” to appear in Reliability Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. W. Brown, Jr., M. Hollander, and R.M. Korwar (1974), “Nonparameteric Test of Independence for Censored Data, with Application to Heart Transplant Studies,” in Reliability and Biometry, F. Proschan and R.F. Serfling, eds., Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, pp. 327–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.R. Cox (1972a), “Regression Models and Life Tables (with Discussion),” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 34, 187–220.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • D.R. Cox (1972b), “The Statistical Analysis of Dependencies in Point Processes” in Stochastic Point Processes, P.A. Lewis, ed., Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp. 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.R. Cox (1975), “Partial Likelihood,” Biometrika, 62, 269–276.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • C. J. Dale (1983), “Application of the Proportional Hazards Model in the Reliability Field,” Proceedings of the Fourth National Reliability Conference—Reliability ′83, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Fisher and P. Kanarek (1974), “Presenting Censored Survival Data when Censoring and Survival Times may not be Independent,” in Reliability and Biometry, F. Proschan and R.J. Serfling, eds., Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, pp. 303–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.K. Jardine and P.M. Anderson (1984), “Use of Concomitant Variables for Reliability Estimation,” Proceedings of the 8th Symposium on Advances in Reliability Technology, Bradford University, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.K. Jardine and J.A. Buzacott (1985), “Equipment Reliability and Maintenance,” European Journal of Operational Research, 19, 285–296.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • G.J. Kujawski and E.A. Rypka (1978), “Effects of ’On-Off’ Cycling on Equipment Reliability,” Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, IEEE Cat. No. 77CH1308-6R, pp. 225–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.F. Lawless (1982), Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data, Wiley-Interscience, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • J.F. Lawless (1983), “Statistical Methods in Reliability (with Discussion),” Technometrics, 25, 305–335.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • B. Littlewood (1981), “Stochastic Reliability Growth: A Model for Fault Removal in Computer- Programs and Hardware-Designs,” IEEE Reliability Transactions, R-30, 313–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • W.Q. Meeker, Jr. (1983), Discussion of Lawless (1983), pp. 316–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.L. Prentice, B.J. Williams, and A.V. Peterson (1981), “On the Regression Analysis of Multivariate Failure Time Data,” Biometrika, 68, 373–379.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • F. Proschan and R.J. Serfling, eds. (1974), Reliability and Biometry: Statistical Analysis of Life length, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.A. Rosanoff (1969), “A Survey of Modern Nonsense as Applied to Matrix Computation,” Technical Papers for Meeting, AIAA/ASME 10th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.L. Shooman (1984), “Software Reliability: A Historical Perspective,” IEEE Reliability Transactions, R-33, 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Spragins (1984), “Limitations of Current Telecommunication Network Reliability Models,” Proceedings IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, IEEE Product No. CH 2064- 4/84/0000, pp. 836–840.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ascher, H. (1986). The Use of Regression Techniques for Matching Reliability Models to the Real World. In: Skwirzynski, J.K. (eds) Software System Design Methods. NATO ASI Series, vol 22. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82846-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82846-1_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-82848-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-82846-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics