Skip to main content

Abstract

A real structural system is so complex that direct exact calculation of the probability of failure is completely impossible. The number of possible different failure modes is so large that they cannot all be taken into account, and even if they could all be included in the analysis exact probabilities of failure cannot be calculated. It is therefore necessary to idealize the structure so that the estimate of the reliability becomes manageable. Not only the structure itself but also the loading must be idealized. Because of these idealizations it is important to bear in mind that the estimates of e.g. probabilities of failure are related to the idealized system (the model) and not directly to the structural system. The main objective of a structural reliability analysis is to be able to design a structure so that the probability of failure is minimized in some sense. Therefore, the model must be chosen carefully so that the most important failure modes for the real structures are reflected in the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Thoft-Christensen, P. & Baker, M. J.: Structural Reliability Theory and Its Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1982.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Sorensen, J. D. & Thoft-Christensen, P.: Model Uncertainty for Bilinear Hysteretic Systems. System Modelling and Optimization (ed. P. Thoft-Christensen).Proc. 11th IFIP Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1983. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 1984, pp. 585–594.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grigoriu, M., Veneziano, D. & Cornell, C. A.: Probabilistic Modelling as Decision Making. A.CE, J. Eng. Mech. Div., Vol. 105, No. EM4, Aug. 1979, pp. 585–597.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ditlevsen, O.: Model Uncertainty in Structural Reliability. Structural Safety, Vol. 1, No. 1, Sept. 1982, pp. 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ang, A. H.-S.: Structural Risk Analysis and Reliability-Based Design. ASCE, J. Struct. Div., Vol. 39, No. ST9, Sept. 1973, pp. 1891–1910.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Milford, R. V.: Structural Reliability and Crosswind Response of Tall Chimneys. Eng. Struct., Vol. 14, Oct. 1982, pp. 263–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. The Nordic Committee on Building Regulations (NKB), The Loading and Safety Group: Recommendations for Loading and Safety Regulations for Structural Design. NKB-Report No. 36, Nov. 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Melchers, R. E. & Tang, L. K.: Reliability of Structural Systems with Stochastically Dominant Modes. Monash University, Australia, Civil Engineering Research Report No. 2/1983.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Daniels, M. E.: The Statistical Theory of the Strength of Bundles of Threads. Proc. Royal Soc., Ser. A, Vol. 183, 1945, pp. 405–435.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Lind, N. C., Krenk, S. & Madsen, H. O.: Safety of Structures. To be published by Prentice Hall Inc., 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hohenbichler, M.: Resistance of Large Brittle Parallel Systems. Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Appl. Stat. and Prob. in Soil and Struc. Eng., University of Firenze, Italy, June 1983, pp. 1301–1312.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hohenbichler, M. & Rackwitz, R.: Reliability of Parallel Systems under Imposed Uni- form Strain. J. Eng. Mech., ASCE, Vol. 109, No. 3, June 1983, pp. 896–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaufmann, A., Grouchko, D. & Cruon, R.: Mathematical Models for the Study of the Reliability of Systems. Academic Press. New York, San Francisco, London, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dunnett, C. W. L. & Sobel, A.: Approximations to the Probability of Integral and Certain Percentage Points of a Multivariate Analogue of Students’ t-Distribution. Biometrika, Vol. 42, pp. 258–260.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Hohenbichler, M.: An Approximation to the Multivariate Normal Distribution Function. Reliability of Structural Systems, SFB 96, Technische Universität, München. Also in Proc. 155th Euromech on Reliability of Structural Eng. Systems, Lyngby, Denmark, June 1982, pp. 79–110.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Murotsu, Y., Yonezawa, M., Oba, F. & Niwa, K.: Method for Reliability Analysis of Structures. Advances in Reliability and Stress Analysis (ed. Burns, J. J., Jr.), ASME Publication No. H00119, 1979, pp. 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thoft-Christensen, P., Murotsu, Y. (1986). Modelling of Structural Systems. In: Application of Structural Systems Reliability Theory. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82764-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82764-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-82766-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-82764-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics