Skip to main content

Overcoming Conceptual Difficulties in Physical Science Through Computer-Based Socratic Dialogs

  • Conference paper
Designing Computer-Based Learning Materials

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NATO ASI F,volume 23))

  • 55 Accesses

Abstract

Research in physics education continues to develop compelling evidence that many students emerge from introductory physics courses with inadequate mastery of some of the most basic concepts and fundamental modes of reasoning. [McDermott (1984); Trowbridge and McDermott (1980), (1981); Axons (1983), (1984a), (1984b); Clement (1982); Fredette and Clement (1981); Minstrell (1982); Viennot (1979)]. Explanation, exposition, presentation, however lucid, are not sufficient to generate grasp and understanding (except, perhaps, in the upper few percent of the students), and conventional end-of-chapter problems and laboratory exercises do not provide adequate help. They leave too many students in a passive intellectual mode, expecting to learn through inculcation, and they fail to generate the kind of active mental engagement essential for learning. Many students, in fact, fail to break through to mastery of certain concepts and reasoning processes unless they are led to articulate the ideas in their own words in a sequence of Socratic dialog.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arons, A. B. (1965). Development of Concepts of Physics. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arons, A. B. (1982). Phenomenology and Logical Reasoning in Introductory Physics Courses. Am. J. Phys. 50, 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arons, A. B. (1983). Student Patterns of Thinking and Reasoning, Part One. The Physics Teacher. 21, 576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayons, A. B. (1984). Student Patterns of Thinking and Reasoning, Part Two. The Physics Teacher. 22, 21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arons, A. B. (1984). Student Patterns of Thinking and Reasoning, Part Three. The Physics Teacher. 22, 88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayons, A. B. (1984c). Education Through Science. Jour. Coll. Sci. Teaching. 13, 210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayons, A., Bork, A., Franklin, S., Kurtz, B., and Collea, F. (1981) Science Literacy in the Public Library - Batteries and Bulbs. in Proceedings of the National Educational computing Conference, June 17–19, 1981 in Denton, TX, USA. Published by University of Iowa Weeg Computing Center. Iowa City, IO, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bork, A. (1980). in Computers and Education, Vol. 4. Pergamon Press Ltd. Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bork, A. (1981). Learning with Computers. Digital Press. Bedford, MA. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bork, A., Trowbridge, D., and Ayons, A. (1983). Observation and Inference A Computer-Based Learning Module. in Proceedings of the National Educational Computing Conference at Baltimore, MD, USA, June 8, 1983. Published by IEEE Computer Society Press, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappetta, E. L. (1976). A Review of Piagetian Studies Relevant to Science Instruction at Secondary and College Level. Sci. Ed. 60, 253. 66

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J. (1982). Students’ Preconceptions in Introductory Mechanics. Am. J. Phys. 50, 66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duda, R. O. and Shortliffe, E. H. (1983). Expert Systems Research. Science. 220, 261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredette, N. H. and Clement, J. (1981). Student Misconceptions of an Electric Circuit: What Do They Mean? J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 10, 280.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, L. C. (1984). Research on Conceptual Understanding in Mechanics. Physics Today. 37, 24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A. E. (1980). Relationships Among Level of Intellectual Development, Cognitive Style, and Grades in a College Biology Course. Sci. Ed. 64, 95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minstrell, J. (1982). Explaining the “At Rest” Condition of an Object. The Physics Teacher. 20, 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B. Growth of Logical Thinking. Basic Books. New York. USA. 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B. (1983). Mathematics and Science Learning: A New Conception. Science 220, 477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowbridge, D. E. and McDermott, L. C. (1980). Investigation of Student Understanding of the Concept of Velocity in One Dimension. Am. J. Phys. 48, 1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trowbridge, D. E. and McDermott, L. C. (1981). Investigation of Student Understanding of the Concept of Acceleration in One Dimension. Am. J. Phys. 49, 242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viennot, L. (1979). Spontaneous Reasoning in Elementary Dynamics. Euro. J. of Sci. Ed. 1, 205.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Arons, A.B. (1986). Overcoming Conceptual Difficulties in Physical Science Through Computer-Based Socratic Dialogs. In: Weinstock, H., Bork, A. (eds) Designing Computer-Based Learning Materials. NATO ASI Series, vol 23. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82654-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82654-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-82656-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-82654-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics