Performance Monitoring Through In-Process Product Quality Measurement

  • E. E. Pickett
  • R. G. Whiting
Conference paper


A production process that appears to be in statistical control can exhibit significant change in its actual performance. This is particularly true when performance must be inferred through attribute sampling, i.e. binary measurement of in-process product quality. This paper addresses the problem of inference of process performance based on such regular quality inspections. The partially observed Markov Chain model, proposed in [7], and elsewhere in connection with a closely related problem (continuous inspection sampling), is suggested as an appropriate framework. Conditions for successful quality monitoring using this model are investigated, such as choice of model order end parameter estimation. These issues are studied via simulation, incorporating maximum likelihood estimation techniques developed in [4]. A numerical procedure that accelerates the convergence of this algorithm is introduced. Application of the methodology to production date is briefly discussed.


Model Order Defect Rate Performance Inference Receiver Order Performance Level Estimate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    Akaike, H. (1974) “A new look at the statistical identification model”, IEEE Trans. Auto. Control, 19, 716–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. (2).
    Burr, I.W. (1976) “Statistical Quality ControlMethods”, Marcel Dekker, N.Y.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    Baum, L.E. and Petrie, T. (1966) “Statistical inference for probabilistic functions of Markov chains”, Ann. Math. Statist. 37, 1559–63.Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    Baum, L.E., Petrie, T., Saules, O., and Weiss, N. (1970) “A maximization technique occurring in the statistical analysis of probabilistic functions of Markov chains”, Ann. Math. Statist, 41, 164–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Baum, L.E. and Sell, O.R. (1968) “Growth transformations for functions on manifolds”, Pacific J. Math., 27, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. (6).
    Chiu, W.K. and Wetherill, O.B. (1973) “The economic design of continuous inspection procedures A review paper”, Inter. Statist. Rev.; 41, 367–373.Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    Elfving, O. (1962) “Quality control for expensive items” Tech. Report No. 57, Appl. Math. Statist Lab, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  8. (8).
    Oirshick, M.A. and Rubin, H. (1952) “ A Bayes approach to a quality control maki”, Ann. Math. Statist, 23, 114–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Ortega, J.M. and Rheinboldt, W.C. (1970), “Iterative Solution of Nonlinear Equations in Several Variables” Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    Whiting, R.O., Pickett, E.E. (1984), “Linear convergence of a maximization technique occuring in the MLE of partially observed Markov chains”, Working Paper 84–03, Dept. of Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    Van Trees, H.L. (1968) “Detection, Estimation end Modulation Theory ( Pert I)”, Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. E. Pickett
    • 1
  • R. G. Whiting
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations