Temperature Effect in Surface Reconstruction of Clean and Hydrogen-Adsorbed W(001) Surface

  • T. Matsubara
Part of the Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences book series (SSSOL, volume 59)


It is now well-known that the clean W(001) surface undergoes a reconstructive phase-transition at certain temperature Tc and exhibits a c(2×2) structure at low temperatures. From various experimental and theoretical sources, it is concluded that this surface reconstruction is a second order transition caused by spontaneous displacements of surface atoms along a direction parallel to the surface as depicted in Fig.1 [1]. The reconstructed structure of W(001)is somehow stabilized when hydrogen atoms are adsorbed, so long as the coverage of hydrogen is small [2], As to the mechanism of the phase-transition, several models have been proposed [3], but at present it seems that an accepted view point is to attribute the origin of driving transition to the competition between stabilizing band electronic force and opposing ion-core repulsive force. Among others, TERAKURA et al. gave an electronic theory of the surface reconstruction on W(001) [4] which could explain even quantitatively the relevant experimental facts for absolute zero T=0. As to temperature-variation of this transition, however, there are a few theories in which the temperature-effect is seriously considered. Probably this is due to the fact that the main source of information on the temperature-dependence of the “order parameter” is LEED experiments, which are much influenced by large surface vibration as far as the temperature-effect is concerned. Indeed, for instance, we can observe in Fig.2, with increasing temperature, strong exponential decay of the scattering intensity of the LEED patterns characteristic to the low-temperature phase [5]. If we look at Fig.2 as a temperature-dependence curve for the “order parameter” of the phase-transition, it would be quite unusual in contrast to the standard behaviour of the order parameter in the second order phase-transition: The transition-temperature is obscured by the exponential tail.


Compressibility Suffix Alse 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    D. A. King : Physica Scripta T4, 34(1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. K. Debe and D. A. King : J. Phys. C10, L1303 (1977).Google Scholar
  3. T. E. Felter, R. A. Barker and P. J. Estrup : Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1138 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    J. E. Inglesfields : Vacuum 31, 663 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 4.
    K. Terakura, I. Terakura and Y. Teraoka : Surface Sci. 80, 535 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. I. Terakura, K. Terakura and N. Hamada : Surface Sci. 103, 103 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. K. Masuda-Jindo, N. Hamada and K. Terakuka : J. Phys. C17, L271 (1984)Google Scholar
  8. 5.
    D. A. King and G. Thomas : Surface Sci. 72, 201 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 6.
    R. A. Barker and P. J. Estrup : J. Chem. Phys. 74, 1442 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 7.
    M. K. Debe and D. A. King : Surface Sci. 81, 193 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 8.
    T. Matsubara and K. Kamiya : Prog. Theor. Phys. 58, 767 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. T. Matsubara, Y. Iwase and A. Momokita : Prog. Theor. Phys. 59, 1102 (1978).Google Scholar
  13. T. Hama and T. Matsubara : Prog. Theor. Phys. 59, 1407 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 9.
    K. H. Lau and S-C. Ying : Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 222 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 10.
    T. Inaoka and A. Yoshimori : Surface Sci. 115, 301 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 11.
    T. Matsubara and T. Odagaki : in preparation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Matsubara
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsKyoto UniversityKyoto 606Japan

Personalised recommendations