Advertisement

Population and Energetic Aspects of the Relationship Between Blackbrowed and Greyheaded Albatrosses and the Southern Ocean Marine Environment

  • P. A. Prince

Summary

The methods and results of the study of the tropho-dynamic relationships between 2 Diomedea albatrosses and the marine environment at South Georgia are described. They illustrate the technical and theoretical developments necessary to obtain certain empirical data essential for accurate assessments of the role of seabirds in marine ecosystems. Differences in breeding success during eight yr (consistent in D. chrysostoma, more variable in D. melanophris) are linked with important differences in breeding frequencies which affect the size and activities of populations at the breeding sites. Extensive dietary studies, based on sampling adults about to feed chicks, showed major inter-specific differences, resulting in chicks receiving meals of similar size and frequency but of different energy content. The frequency of chick feeding was determined initially by daily and 3-h weighing. Recently automatic equipment has recorded weights every 10 min, giving the frequency and size of meals and resulting digestive performances of the chicks. Experiments involving exchanging chicks between the two species were combined with new methods for analyzing growth curves. They showed that, while there was a species-specific genetic component to growth, the overall rate could be significantly modified by the nature of the diet. The slower growth rate of D. chrysostoma chicks, and the species’ diet, are probably important factors affecting breeding frequency. Adult feeding performance is being studied by devices recording simple activity budgets at sea. Preliminary results are described and projected work linking this with the automatic weighing equipment and with assessment of foraging energy costs is outlined.

Keywords

Energy Content Breeding Population Breeding Success Meal Size King Penguin 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clarke A; Prince PA (1980) Chemical composition and calorific value of food fed to mollymauk chicks Diomedea melanophris and D. chrysostoma at Bird Island, South Georgia. Ibis 122: 488–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clarke MR; Prince PA (1981) Cephalopod remains in regurgitations of black-browed and grey-headed albatrosses at South Georgia. Bull Br Antarct Sury 54: 1–8Google Scholar
  3. Croxall JP; Prince PA (1979) Antarctic seabird and seal monitoring studies. Polar Rec 19: 573–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Croxall JP; Prince PA (1982) Calorific content of squid ( Mollusca: Cephalopoda). Bull Br Antarct Sury 55: 27–31Google Scholar
  5. Croxall JP; Prince PA; Ricketts C (1985) Relationships between prey life-cycles and the extent, nature and timing of seal and seabird predation in the Scotia Sea. In: Siegfried WR, Condy PR, Laws RM (eds) Antarctic nutrient cycles and food webs (Proceedings of the 4th SCAR symposium on Antarctic biology). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis RW; Kooyman GL; Croxall JP (1983) Water flux and estimated metabolism of free-ranging gentoo and macaroni penguins at South Georgia. Polar Biol 2: 41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kooyman GL; Davis RW; Croxall JP; Costa DP (1982) Diving depths and energy requirements of king penguins. Science 217: 726–727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nagy KA (1980) CO2 production in animals: analysis of potential errors in the doubly labelled water method. Am J Physiol 238: 454–465Google Scholar
  9. Potter IC; Prince PA; Croxall JP (1979) Data on the adult marine and migratory phases in the life cycle of the southern hemisphere lamprey Geotria australis Gray. Environ Biol Fishes 41: 65–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Prince PA (1980) The food and feeding ecology of grey-headed albatross Diomedea chrysostoma and black-browed albatross D. melanophris. Ibis 122: 746–488Google Scholar
  11. Prince PA; Francis MD (1984) Activity budgets of foraging grey-headed albatrosses. Condor 96: 297–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Prince PA; Payne MR (1979) Current status of birds at South Georgia. Bull Br Antarct Sury 48: 103–118Google Scholar
  13. Prince PA; Ricketts C (1981) Relationships between food supply and growth in albatrosses: an interspecies chick fostering experiment. Ornis Scand 12: 207–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Prince PA; Ricketts C; Thomas G (1981) Weight loss in incubating albatrosses and its implications for their energy and food requirements. Condor 83: 238–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Prince PA; Walton DWH (1984) Automated measurements of feed size and feeding frequency in albatrosses. J Appl Ecol 21: 790–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ricketts C; Prince PA (1981) Comparison of growth of albatrosses. Ornis Scand 12: 120–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ricketts C; Prince PA (1984) Estimates of metabolic costs and food conversion efficiency in albatross chicks using field weighings. Auk 101: 790–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ricklefs RE; Matthew KK (1983) Rates of oxygen consumption in four species of seabird at Palmer Station, Antarctic Peninsula. Comp Biochem Physiol 74A: 885–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tickell WLN; Pinder R (1975) Breeding biology of the black-browed albatross Diomedea melanophris and grey-headed albatross D. chrysostoma at Bird Island, South Georgia. Ibis 117: 433–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. A. Prince
    • 1
  1. 1.British Antarctic SurveyNERCCambridgeGreat Britain

Personalised recommendations