Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Recent Results in Cancer Research ((RECENTCANCER,volume 91))

Abstract

Work on the receptor status of human malignant breast tumours has passed from an initial qualitative stage to the realization that quantitative aspects may be of clinical importance [12, 15]. Estimates of receptor site concentrations depend not only on the chemical analytical technique used but also on the method of calculation [4, 5, 13, 17]. Several approaches to the mathematical analysis of receptor data can be considered and recent work has shown that accuracy may be improved by the use of techniques not previously applied to receptor assays [4, 5,13].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baulieu EE, Raynaud JP (1970) A “proportion graph” method for measuring binding systems. Eur J Biochem 13: 293–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Braunsberg H (1975) The determination of high-affinity oestrogen receptors in human breast tumours. Eur J Cancer 11: 101–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Braunsberg H, Hammond KD (1979) Methods of steroid receptor calculation: an interlaboratory study. J Steroid Biochem 11: 1561–1565

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Braunsberg H, Hammond KD (1980) Practical and theoretical aspects in the analysis of steroid receptors. J Steroid Biochem 13: 1133–1145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Braunsberg H, Hammond KD (1981) The calculation of receptor parameters. In: Safarty GA, Nash AR, Keightley DD (eds) Quality assurance in estrogen receptor assays. Masson, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clark JH, Peck EJ (1979) Female sex steroids. Receptors and function. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cressie NAC, Keightley DD (1979) The underlying structure of the direct linear plot with application to the analysis of hormone-receptor interactions. J Steroid Biochem 11: 1173–1180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eisenthal R, Cornish-Bowden A (1974) The direct linear plot: a new graphical procedure for estimating enzyme kinetic parameters. Biochem J 139: 715–720

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Feherty P, Farrer-Brown G, Kellie AE (1971) Oestradiol receptors in carcinoma and benign disease of the breast: an in vitro assay. Br J Cancer 25: 697–710

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Haldane JB (1957) Graphical methods in enzyme chemistry. Nature 179: 832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hammond KD, Braunsberg H (1979) Assay of human endometrial progesterone receptors using the natural hormone and a polyethylene glycol precipitation technique. J Steroid Biochem 13: 1147–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heuson JC, Longeval E, Mattheiem WH, Deboel MC, Sylvester RJ, Leclercq G (1977) Significance of quantitative assessment of estrogen receptors for endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer. Cancer 39: 1971–1977

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Keightley DD, Cressie NAC (1980) The Woolf plot is more reliable than the Scatchard plot in analysing data from hormone receptor assays. J Steroid Biochem 13: 1317–1323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lineweaver H, Burk D (1934) The determination of enzyme dissociation constants. J Am Chem Soc 56: 658–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McGuire WL, Zava DT, Horwitz KB, Garola RE, Chamness GC (1978) Receptors and breast cancer: do we know it all? J Steroid Biochem 9: 461–466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ojasoo T, Raynaud JP (1978) Unique steroid cogeners for receptor studies. Cancer Res 38: 4186–4198

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rodbard D, Munson PJ, Thakur AK (1980) Quantitative characterization of hormone receptors. Cancer 46: 2907–2918

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenthal HE (1967) A graphic method for the determination and presentation of binding parameters in a complex system. Anal Biochem 20: 525–532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Scatchard G (1949) The attractions of proteins for small molecules and ions. Ann NY Acad Sci 51: 660–672

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wagner RK (1972) Characterization and assay of steroid hormone receptors and steroid binding serum proteins by agargel electrophoresis at low temperature. Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem 353: 1235–1245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Braunsberg, H. (1984). Mathematical Analysis of Data from Receptor Assays. In: Leclercq, G., Toma, S., Paridaens, R., Heuson, J.C. (eds) Clinical Interest of Steroid Hormone Receptors in Breast Cancer. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 91. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82188-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82188-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-82190-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-82188-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics