Nuclear Acoustic Resonance Measurements of the Electron-Phonon Interaction in bcc Transition Metals

  • V. Müller
  • E.-J. Unterhorst
  • W. Neumann
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences book series (SSSOL, volume 51)


From pair-potential-model based analyses it has been deduced /1/ that in metals a substantial fraction of the outer electrons of atoms are highly incompressible but shape deformable. It is therefore expected that phononinduced changes in the shape of the electron spatial charge distribution will play the dominant role in the volume conserving part of the electron-phonon interaction. Confining ourselves to cubic metals, it is easy to realize that changes in the shape of the electron cloud may only be accomplished by the shear part \( \widehat \in \) (i.e. the volume conserving part) of the strain field e, whereas changes in volume will originate from the isotropic so-called hydrostatic part 1 · Tr є. If, on the other hand, the Wigner-Seitz cells of a cubic metal are (homogenously) strained by a long-wavelength (λ ≫ λDebye) ultrasonic shear mode, then the lowest electric multi-pole field of each Wigner-Seitz cell is no longer the 16-pole field — as in the undistorted (or “hydrostatically”strained) cubic crystal — but the strain-induced dynamic electric field gradient (DEFG) tensor \( \widehat V \) whose components can be determined in a nuclear acoustic resonance (NAR) experiment. NAP measurements of the DEFG in transition metals should therefore provide detailed informations about the electron-phonon interaction — in particular that of d electrons — which otherwise are hard to obtain.


Shape Deformable Shear Part Transition Metal Series Hydrostatic Part Nuclear Acoustic Resonance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. /1/.
    E.S. Machlin and S.H. Whang: Phys.Rev.Lett. 41, 1421 (1978)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. /2/.
    V. Müller, E.J. Unterhorst, W. Neumann, G. Schanz and C. Schubert: Phys.Lett.A, accepted for publication (1983)Google Scholar
  3. /3/.
    J. Pellison and J. Buttet: Phys.Rev.B 11, 48 (1975)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. /4/.
    E. Fischer, V. Müller, D. Ploumbidisawn G. Schanz: Phys.Rev.Lett. 40, 796 (1978)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. /5/.
    B. Strobel and V. Müller: Phys.Rev. B 24, 6292 (1982)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. /6/.
    / E.-J. Unterhorst, V. Müller, G. Schanz and D. Maurer: in Superconductivity in d-and f-Band Metals, ed. by W. Buckel and W. Weber, 389 (1982)Google Scholar
  7. /7/.
    K.H. Bennemann: Phys.Rev.Lett. 42, 676 (1979)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. /8/.
    / M. Peter, W. Klose, G. Adam, P.Entel and E. Kudla: Helv.Phys.Acta 47, 807 (1974)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Müller
    • 1
  • E.-J. Unterhorst
    • 1
  • W. Neumann
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Atom- und Festkörperphysik (B)Freie Universität BerlinBerlin 33Germany

Personalised recommendations