Abstract
We must now try to draw conclusions on the papers which were presented. I invite the participants to make their remarks, criticisms and suggestions. I first propose to review and classify the topics, to examine the experimental methods, to make a survey of the main results which were obtained, and finally to compare prediction with experiment. Hence, we can expect to become aware of specific difficulties in computing flows, and have a glimpse on the orientations which would be of interest in the researches.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Hanjalic, K. et Launder, B. E. “A Reynolds stress model of turbulence and its application to thin shear flows” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 52, part 4, pp. 609–638 (1972).
Launder, B.E. “An improved algebraic stress model in turbulence” Imperial College, Mech. Engng. Dept., Report No. TM/TN/A/9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dumas, R., Fulachier, L. (1983). General Discussion: Supersonic Flows. In: Dumas, R., Fulachier, L. (eds) Structure of Complex Turbulent Shear Flow. International Union of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81991-9_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81991-9_34
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-81993-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-81991-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive