Symbols and Units: Toward Standardization
- 217 Downloads
In attempting to combine the expertise of specialists in various disciplines under the title of polarographic oxygen measurement, it became necessary to reach conformity as to the usage of different terms, units, and symbols. Despite the recommendations periodically published by international committees as to what constitutes a standardized scientific terminology [3,5, 6], agreement is rather poor. Interdisciplinary communication and clarity in the documentation of scientific literature can be improved by a stricter adherance to the fundamental guidelines at present available. Some conflicting terms and some apparently problematic units are discussed briefly in the following.
KeywordsOxygen Consumption Rate Basic Quantity Scientific Terminology Quantity Quantity Physiological Literature
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Fatt I (1976) Polarographic oxygen sensors. CR C Press, Cleveland, p 2Google Scholar
- 3.Weast RC (ed) (1974–75) Handbook of chemistry and physics, 55th edn. CR C Press, ClevelandGoogle Scholar
- 4.International Union of Physiological Sciences (1973) Glossary on respiration and gas exchange. Prepared for publication by Bartels H, Dejours P, Kellogg RH, Mead J. J Appl Physiol 34:549– 558Google Scholar
- 5.Interunion Commission on Biothermodynamics (IUPAC, IUB, IUPAB) (1982) Calorimetric measurements on cellular systems. Recommendations for measurements and presentation of results. Prepared by Belaich JP, Beezer AE, Prosen E, Wadsö I. Pure Appl Chem (in press)Google Scholar
- 6.IUPAC (1979) Manual of symbols and terminology for physicochemical quantities and units. Prepared for publication by Whiffen DH. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 41 ppGoogle Scholar
- 7.Lehninger AL (1975) Biochemistry. Woerth Publ, New YorkGoogle Scholar