Skip to main content

Bethe Ansatz, Connection Between One-Dimensional Models and Their Classification

  • Conference paper
Physics in One Dimension

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences ((SSSOL,volume 23))

  • 347 Accesses

Abstract

The relationship between one dimensional (ID) theories in field theory and Solid State Physics as well as one and two dimensional (2D) models in statistical mechanics has proved rather useful for the study of quasi-one dimensional systems. As for the exact diagonalization (of the Hamiltonian or the transfer matrix) of these models the Bethe Ansatz [1](BA) has proved to be a very powerful method. In addition to the well known solutions [2,3] this method was recently used to diagonalize the massive Thirring [4, 5] and the chiral-invariant Gross-Neveu [7, 8] models and the Kondo problem [9].

Supported in part by Brown University’s Material Research Laboratory founded by the National Science Foundation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. H.A. Bethe, Z. Physik 71(1931)205.

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. E.H. Lieb and W. Liniger, Phys.Rev.130 (1963) 1605

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. E.H. Lieb. ibid 130, (1963)1616.

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Brezin and J. Sinn-Justin, CR. Acad. Sci. (Paris) B263, (1966) 670.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C.N. Yang and C.P. Yang, Phys.Rev. 150 (1966) 321

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. C.N. Yang and C.P. Yang, Phys.Rev. 150 (1966) 327.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. F.A. Berezin and V.N. Sushko,Sov. Phys. JETP 21 (1965) 865.

    MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Bergnoff and H.B. Thacker, Phys.Rev.Lett. 42 (1979) 135

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Bergnoff and H.B. Thacker, Phys.Rev. D19 (1979) 3666.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. V.E. Korepin, KFKI preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. Andrei and J.H. Lowenstein, Phys.Rev.Lett. 43 (1979) 1698.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. A.A. Belavin, Phys.Lett. 87B (1979) 117.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. N. Andrei, Phys.Rev.Lett. 45 (1980) 379.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. E. Berkcan, U. Mohanty and L. N Cooper, to be published.

    Google Scholar 

  15. F.A. Berezin and V. N. Sushko, Ref. 4 C.N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 168(1968) 1920. E. Berkcan, unpublished. V.E. Korepin, Ref.6. N.Andrei and J.H. Lowenstein, NYU preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See, for example,M. Karowski, Phys.Rep. C49 (1979) 222 and the references therein.

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. Berkcan, L.N Cooper, to be published.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Since we have local relativistic theories in mind, we restrict ourselves to δ-function potentials.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C.N. Yang, Phys.Rev.Lett. 19 (1967) 1312.

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. For Jx ≠ Jy (≠Jz) this problem is solved by an Ansatz [21] which will hence-forth be referred to as the generalized Bethe Ansatz. This is justified by the fact that in a particular continuum limit the former reduces to the Bethe Ansatz that solves the massive Thirring model [4,5].

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Lakshmanan, Phys. Lett. 61A (1977) 53.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. V.E. Zakharov and L.A. Takhtadzhyan, Teor.Mat.Fiz 38 (1979) 26.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. P.P. Kulish and E.K. Sklyanin, Phys.Lett. 70A (1979) 461. After this work has been completed it has been brought to our attention that J.H.H.Perk, Scriptie, Univ. of Amsterdam 1974 (unpublished) has also obtained the same result.

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. A Luther, Phys. Rev. B14 (1979) 2153.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. R.J. Baxter, Phys.Rev.Lett. 26 (1971) 832

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. R.J. Baxter, 26(1971) 834.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. J.D. Johnson, S. Krinsky and B.M. McCoy, Phys.Rev. A8 (1973) 2526.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. R.J. Baxter, Ann.Israel Phys. Soc. 2(1) (1978) 37.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Berkcan, E., Cooper, L.N. (1981). Bethe Ansatz, Connection Between One-Dimensional Models and Their Classification. In: Bernasconi, J., Schneider, T. (eds) Physics in One Dimension. Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, vol 23. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81592-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81592-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-81594-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-81592-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics